Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out: A comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla

Sarah A. Peel, Tarique Hussain, Tobias Schaeffter, Gerald F. Greil, Miriam W. Lagemaat, Rene M. Botnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T). Materials and Methods: Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil. Results: Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03). Conclusion: Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)969-975
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Coronary Vessels
Artifacts
Healthy Volunteers
Respiration

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • coronary vessel wall
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • spiral readout

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out : A comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla. / Peel, Sarah A.; Hussain, Tarique; Schaeffter, Tobias; Greil, Gerald F.; Lagemaat, Miriam W.; Botnar, Rene M.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.04.2012, p. 969-975.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac0204e3567044f29ef6847f967cf12c,
title = "Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out: A comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T). Materials and Methods: Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil. Results: Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03). Conclusion: Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T.",
keywords = "coronary artery disease, coronary vessel wall, magnetic resonance imaging, spiral readout",
author = "Peel, {Sarah A.} and Tarique Hussain and Tobias Schaeffter and Greil, {Gerald F.} and Lagemaat, {Miriam W.} and Botnar, {Rene M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.23528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "969--975",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out

T2 - A comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla

AU - Peel, Sarah A.

AU - Hussain, Tarique

AU - Schaeffter, Tobias

AU - Greil, Gerald F.

AU - Lagemaat, Miriam W.

AU - Botnar, Rene M.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T). Materials and Methods: Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil. Results: Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03). Conclusion: Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T.

AB - Purpose: To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T). Materials and Methods: Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil. Results: Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03). Conclusion: Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T.

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - coronary vessel wall

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - spiral readout

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858709998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858709998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.23528

DO - 10.1002/jmri.23528

M3 - Article

C2 - 22170809

AN - SCOPUS:84858709998

VL - 35

SP - 969

EP - 975

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 4

ER -