Current Concepts on the Distal Margin of Resection of Rectal Cancer Tumors after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Jonathan Imran, Jie J. Yao, Tarik Madni, Sergio Huerta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The following review addresses concepts regarding the appropriate distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum in the era of preoperative chemoradiation. Recent Findings: The management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum continues to improve in all aspects of its tri-modality treatment (preoperative chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant therapy). The multidisciplinary approach to the management of this disease continues to evolve with a goal to provide better oncologic outcomes with less morbidity in patients affected by this disease. For locoregionally advanced disease, total mesorectal excision continues to be the standard of care for an intended cure for this cohort of patients. As we understand more regarding the oncologic benefits of preoperative chemoradiation, the appropriate distal margin of resection has also evolved to decrease morbidity and maximize postoperative quality of life. Currently, a 1.0-cm distal margin of resection is the most accepted margin after resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum; however, several recent studies have indicated that margins of 5.0 mm or smaller are safe. A study from 2014 showed similar disease-free and overall survival rates, as well as pelvic recurrence rates, between patients with >3.0 or ≤3.0-mm distal margin of resection. Summary and Conclusion: A 1.0-cm margin is the most accepted distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Subcentimeter margins as small as 2.0–5.0 mm may be safe, as recent reports show similar rates of recurrence and survival when compared to larger margins. At this time, we require more evidence to conclude that a distal margin of resection smaller than 1.0 cm is appropriate in the surgical management of rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Colorectal Cancer Reports
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 23 2017

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Rectum
Adenocarcinoma
Survival Rate
Morbidity
Recurrence
Standard of Care
Disease Management
Margins of Excision
Disease-Free Survival
Quality of Life
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • APR
  • Chemoradiation
  • Induction chemotherapy
  • LAR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Current Concepts on the Distal Margin of Resection of Rectal Cancer Tumors after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. / Imran, Jonathan; Yao, Jie J.; Madni, Tarik; Huerta, Sergio.

In: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, 23.01.2017, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f45f81d67ec432da5d2f06e2ec78fe4,
title = "Current Concepts on the Distal Margin of Resection of Rectal Cancer Tumors after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: The following review addresses concepts regarding the appropriate distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum in the era of preoperative chemoradiation. Recent Findings: The management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum continues to improve in all aspects of its tri-modality treatment (preoperative chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant therapy). The multidisciplinary approach to the management of this disease continues to evolve with a goal to provide better oncologic outcomes with less morbidity in patients affected by this disease. For locoregionally advanced disease, total mesorectal excision continues to be the standard of care for an intended cure for this cohort of patients. As we understand more regarding the oncologic benefits of preoperative chemoradiation, the appropriate distal margin of resection has also evolved to decrease morbidity and maximize postoperative quality of life. Currently, a 1.0-cm distal margin of resection is the most accepted margin after resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum; however, several recent studies have indicated that margins of 5.0 mm or smaller are safe. A study from 2014 showed similar disease-free and overall survival rates, as well as pelvic recurrence rates, between patients with >3.0 or ≤3.0-mm distal margin of resection. Summary and Conclusion: A 1.0-cm margin is the most accepted distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Subcentimeter margins as small as 2.0–5.0 mm may be safe, as recent reports show similar rates of recurrence and survival when compared to larger margins. At this time, we require more evidence to conclude that a distal margin of resection smaller than 1.0 cm is appropriate in the surgical management of rectal cancer.",
keywords = "APR, Chemoradiation, Induction chemotherapy, LAR",
author = "Jonathan Imran and Yao, {Jie J.} and Tarik Madni and Sergio Huerta",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s11888-017-0343-z",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Current Colorectal Cancer Reports",
issn = "1556-3790",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current Concepts on the Distal Margin of Resection of Rectal Cancer Tumors after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

AU - Imran, Jonathan

AU - Yao, Jie J.

AU - Madni, Tarik

AU - Huerta, Sergio

PY - 2017/1/23

Y1 - 2017/1/23

N2 - Purpose of Review: The following review addresses concepts regarding the appropriate distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum in the era of preoperative chemoradiation. Recent Findings: The management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum continues to improve in all aspects of its tri-modality treatment (preoperative chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant therapy). The multidisciplinary approach to the management of this disease continues to evolve with a goal to provide better oncologic outcomes with less morbidity in patients affected by this disease. For locoregionally advanced disease, total mesorectal excision continues to be the standard of care for an intended cure for this cohort of patients. As we understand more regarding the oncologic benefits of preoperative chemoradiation, the appropriate distal margin of resection has also evolved to decrease morbidity and maximize postoperative quality of life. Currently, a 1.0-cm distal margin of resection is the most accepted margin after resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum; however, several recent studies have indicated that margins of 5.0 mm or smaller are safe. A study from 2014 showed similar disease-free and overall survival rates, as well as pelvic recurrence rates, between patients with >3.0 or ≤3.0-mm distal margin of resection. Summary and Conclusion: A 1.0-cm margin is the most accepted distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Subcentimeter margins as small as 2.0–5.0 mm may be safe, as recent reports show similar rates of recurrence and survival when compared to larger margins. At this time, we require more evidence to conclude that a distal margin of resection smaller than 1.0 cm is appropriate in the surgical management of rectal cancer.

AB - Purpose of Review: The following review addresses concepts regarding the appropriate distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum in the era of preoperative chemoradiation. Recent Findings: The management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum continues to improve in all aspects of its tri-modality treatment (preoperative chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant therapy). The multidisciplinary approach to the management of this disease continues to evolve with a goal to provide better oncologic outcomes with less morbidity in patients affected by this disease. For locoregionally advanced disease, total mesorectal excision continues to be the standard of care for an intended cure for this cohort of patients. As we understand more regarding the oncologic benefits of preoperative chemoradiation, the appropriate distal margin of resection has also evolved to decrease morbidity and maximize postoperative quality of life. Currently, a 1.0-cm distal margin of resection is the most accepted margin after resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum; however, several recent studies have indicated that margins of 5.0 mm or smaller are safe. A study from 2014 showed similar disease-free and overall survival rates, as well as pelvic recurrence rates, between patients with >3.0 or ≤3.0-mm distal margin of resection. Summary and Conclusion: A 1.0-cm margin is the most accepted distal margin of resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Subcentimeter margins as small as 2.0–5.0 mm may be safe, as recent reports show similar rates of recurrence and survival when compared to larger margins. At this time, we require more evidence to conclude that a distal margin of resection smaller than 1.0 cm is appropriate in the surgical management of rectal cancer.

KW - APR

KW - Chemoradiation

KW - Induction chemotherapy

KW - LAR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010749166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010749166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11888-017-0343-z

DO - 10.1007/s11888-017-0343-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010749166

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

JF - Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

SN - 1556-3790

ER -