Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Michael R. Sayre, Robert Swor, Paul E. Pepe, Jerry Overton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines and emergency medical services (EMS) clinical protocols usually recommend immediate defibrillation for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who have ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, animal studies and results from a small number of clinical investigations now suggest that a short period of chest compressions or ACLS procedures delivered before defibrillation may improve the outcome of patients with prolonged VF. Although the basic science and clinical data supporting a chest-compression-first procedure are compelling, large, multicenter randomized trials are still necessary to determine whether such protocols do indeed improve outcome. In current EMS dispatch practice, traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions are given when needed to bystanders who report a possible cardiac arrest. Recent literature has shown that in certain circumstances, CPR instructions involving chest compressions alone may be given more quickly and can yield an equivalent, if not better, chance of survival. Although this practice is controversial, the general consensus is that any CPR is better than none at all. Therefore, telephone CPR protocols that recommend the immediate initiation of chest compressions may be preferred, particularly for callers who have no previous training in CPR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume7
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Thorax
Advanced Cardiac Life Support
Emergency Medical Services
Ventricular Fibrillation
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Clinical Protocols
Heart Arrest
Telephone
Multicenter Studies
Guidelines
Survival

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Chest compressions
  • Defibrillation
  • Prehospital care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Sayre, M. R., Swor, R., Pepe, P. E., & Overton, J. (2003). Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care, 7(1), 24-30.

Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. / Sayre, Michael R.; Swor, Robert; Pepe, Paul E.; Overton, Jerry.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 24-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sayre, MR, Swor, R, Pepe, PE & Overton, J 2003, 'Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24-30.
Sayre, Michael R. ; Swor, Robert ; Pepe, Paul E. ; Overton, Jerry. / Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2003 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 24-30.
@article{ea7497d6dfc043e3baaeacd8f1faaf8e,
title = "Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation",
abstract = "Current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines and emergency medical services (EMS) clinical protocols usually recommend immediate defibrillation for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who have ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, animal studies and results from a small number of clinical investigations now suggest that a short period of chest compressions or ACLS procedures delivered before defibrillation may improve the outcome of patients with prolonged VF. Although the basic science and clinical data supporting a chest-compression-first procedure are compelling, large, multicenter randomized trials are still necessary to determine whether such protocols do indeed improve outcome. In current EMS dispatch practice, traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions are given when needed to bystanders who report a possible cardiac arrest. Recent literature has shown that in certain circumstances, CPR instructions involving chest compressions alone may be given more quickly and can yield an equivalent, if not better, chance of survival. Although this practice is controversial, the general consensus is that any CPR is better than none at all. Therefore, telephone CPR protocols that recommend the immediate initiation of chest compressions may be preferred, particularly for callers who have no previous training in CPR.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Chest compressions, Defibrillation, Prehospital care",
author = "Sayre, {Michael R.} and Robert Swor and Pepe, {Paul E.} and Jerry Overton",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "24--30",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AU - Sayre, Michael R.

AU - Swor, Robert

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

AU - Overton, Jerry

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - Current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines and emergency medical services (EMS) clinical protocols usually recommend immediate defibrillation for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who have ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, animal studies and results from a small number of clinical investigations now suggest that a short period of chest compressions or ACLS procedures delivered before defibrillation may improve the outcome of patients with prolonged VF. Although the basic science and clinical data supporting a chest-compression-first procedure are compelling, large, multicenter randomized trials are still necessary to determine whether such protocols do indeed improve outcome. In current EMS dispatch practice, traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions are given when needed to bystanders who report a possible cardiac arrest. Recent literature has shown that in certain circumstances, CPR instructions involving chest compressions alone may be given more quickly and can yield an equivalent, if not better, chance of survival. Although this practice is controversial, the general consensus is that any CPR is better than none at all. Therefore, telephone CPR protocols that recommend the immediate initiation of chest compressions may be preferred, particularly for callers who have no previous training in CPR.

AB - Current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines and emergency medical services (EMS) clinical protocols usually recommend immediate defibrillation for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who have ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, animal studies and results from a small number of clinical investigations now suggest that a short period of chest compressions or ACLS procedures delivered before defibrillation may improve the outcome of patients with prolonged VF. Although the basic science and clinical data supporting a chest-compression-first procedure are compelling, large, multicenter randomized trials are still necessary to determine whether such protocols do indeed improve outcome. In current EMS dispatch practice, traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions are given when needed to bystanders who report a possible cardiac arrest. Recent literature has shown that in certain circumstances, CPR instructions involving chest compressions alone may be given more quickly and can yield an equivalent, if not better, chance of survival. Although this practice is controversial, the general consensus is that any CPR is better than none at all. Therefore, telephone CPR protocols that recommend the immediate initiation of chest compressions may be preferred, particularly for callers who have no previous training in CPR.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Chest compressions

KW - Defibrillation

KW - Prehospital care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037234151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037234151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 24

EP - 30

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -