Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference

Victoria H. Coleman-Cowger, Kristine Erickson, Catherine Y. Spong, Barry Portnoy, Jennifer Croswell, Jay Schulkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine obstetrician-gynecologists' practice patterns of cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) following the 2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science conference on this topic, and compare them with those in their practice prior to the conference. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to 612 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists fellows who participated in a 2006 preconference survey, with 59% responding. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, practice, attitudes, knowledge regarding potential risks and benefits, counseling practices, and department policies with regards to CDMR. RESULTS: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists in our sample continues to believe that a woman has the right to CDMR, but fewer than in 2006 would agree to perform this procedure. In general, obstetriciangynecologists associate more risks and fewer benefits with CDMR than in 2006. CONCLUSION: Some physicians have shifted their perception of CDMR risks and benefits since the NIH State-of-the-Science conference; however, practice patterns have not changed significantly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-30
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume55
Issue number1-2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mothers
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Women's Rights
Counseling
Demography
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cesarean section
  • Maternal request
  • State-of-the-science conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference. / Coleman-Cowger, Victoria H.; Erickson, Kristine; Spong, Catherine Y.; Portnoy, Barry; Croswell, Jennifer; Schulkin, Jay.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 55, No. 1-2, 01.01.2010, p. 25-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman-Cowger, Victoria H. ; Erickson, Kristine ; Spong, Catherine Y. ; Portnoy, Barry ; Croswell, Jennifer ; Schulkin, Jay. / Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference. In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 2010 ; Vol. 55, No. 1-2. pp. 25-30.
@article{57266f14682348debec6c7ee9ec4090e,
title = "Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine obstetrician-gynecologists' practice patterns of cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) following the 2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science conference on this topic, and compare them with those in their practice prior to the conference. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to 612 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists fellows who participated in a 2006 preconference survey, with 59{\%} responding. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, practice, attitudes, knowledge regarding potential risks and benefits, counseling practices, and department policies with regards to CDMR. RESULTS: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists in our sample continues to believe that a woman has the right to CDMR, but fewer than in 2006 would agree to perform this procedure. In general, obstetriciangynecologists associate more risks and fewer benefits with CDMR than in 2006. CONCLUSION: Some physicians have shifted their perception of CDMR risks and benefits since the NIH State-of-the-Science conference; however, practice patterns have not changed significantly.",
keywords = "Cesarean section, Maternal request, State-of-the-science conference",
author = "Coleman-Cowger, {Victoria H.} and Kristine Erickson and Spong, {Catherine Y.} and Barry Portnoy and Jennifer Croswell and Jay Schulkin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "25--30",
journal = "The Journal of reproductive medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference

AU - Coleman-Cowger, Victoria H.

AU - Erickson, Kristine

AU - Spong, Catherine Y.

AU - Portnoy, Barry

AU - Croswell, Jennifer

AU - Schulkin, Jay

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine obstetrician-gynecologists' practice patterns of cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) following the 2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science conference on this topic, and compare them with those in their practice prior to the conference. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to 612 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists fellows who participated in a 2006 preconference survey, with 59% responding. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, practice, attitudes, knowledge regarding potential risks and benefits, counseling practices, and department policies with regards to CDMR. RESULTS: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists in our sample continues to believe that a woman has the right to CDMR, but fewer than in 2006 would agree to perform this procedure. In general, obstetriciangynecologists associate more risks and fewer benefits with CDMR than in 2006. CONCLUSION: Some physicians have shifted their perception of CDMR risks and benefits since the NIH State-of-the-Science conference; however, practice patterns have not changed significantly.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine obstetrician-gynecologists' practice patterns of cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) following the 2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science conference on this topic, and compare them with those in their practice prior to the conference. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to 612 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists fellows who participated in a 2006 preconference survey, with 59% responding. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, practice, attitudes, knowledge regarding potential risks and benefits, counseling practices, and department policies with regards to CDMR. RESULTS: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists in our sample continues to believe that a woman has the right to CDMR, but fewer than in 2006 would agree to perform this procedure. In general, obstetriciangynecologists associate more risks and fewer benefits with CDMR than in 2006. CONCLUSION: Some physicians have shifted their perception of CDMR risks and benefits since the NIH State-of-the-Science conference; however, practice patterns have not changed significantly.

KW - Cesarean section

KW - Maternal request

KW - State-of-the-science conference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952778490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952778490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20337204

AN - SCOPUS:77952778490

VL - 55

SP - 25

EP - 30

JO - The Journal of reproductive medicine

JF - The Journal of reproductive medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 1-2

ER -