Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: A survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002

Rod J. Rohrich, Amanda A. Gosman, Spencer A. Brown, Prasanthi Tonadapu, Barbara Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1724-1733
Number of pages10
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume114
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Breast
Lipectomy
Plastic Surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Chi-Square Distribution
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Current preferences for breast reduction techniques : A survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002. / Rohrich, Rod J.; Gosman, Amanda A.; Brown, Spencer A.; Tonadapu, Prasanthi; Foster, Barbara.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 114, No. 7, 12.2004, p. 1724-1733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rohrich, Rod J. ; Gosman, Amanda A. ; Brown, Spencer A. ; Tonadapu, Prasanthi ; Foster, Barbara. / Current preferences for breast reduction techniques : A survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 114, No. 7. pp. 1724-1733.
@article{c444ac73d72441a49c51c1056fe1199e,
title = "Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: A survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002",
abstract = "The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.",
author = "Rohrich, {Rod J.} and Gosman, {Amanda A.} and Brown, {Spencer A.} and Prasanthi Tonadapu and Barbara Foster",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.PRS.0000142480.27748.9E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "1724--1733",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current preferences for breast reduction techniques

T2 - A survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002

AU - Rohrich, Rod J.

AU - Gosman, Amanda A.

AU - Brown, Spencer A.

AU - Tonadapu, Prasanthi

AU - Foster, Barbara

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.

AB - The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944367987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944367987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000142480.27748.9E

DO - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000142480.27748.9E

M3 - Article

C2 - 15577341

AN - SCOPUS:14944367987

VL - 114

SP - 1724

EP - 1733

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 7

ER -