Current status of surgical intervention for the management of rectal cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgery for rectal cancer has advanced greatly over the past decade. Our knowledge of total mesorectal excision has led to improved oncologic outcomes. The concept of extralevator abdomino-perineal resection shows promise for reducing recurrence rates in tumors of the low rectum and anal canal. Once popular, local excision of rectal tumors has now been shown to have largely unacceptable recurrence rates. Minimally invasive techniques of laparoscopic and robotic surgery are technically feasible, and promise decreased complications in the future. Finally, new colonoscopic and endoscopic techniques offer alternatives for those unfit for surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-382
Number of pages10
JournalCritical Reviews in Oncogenesis
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Recurrence
Anal Canal
Robotics
Rectum
Laparoscopy
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Abdomino-perineal resection
  • Laparoscopy
  • Proctectomy
  • Rectal cancer
  • Robotics
  • Total mesorectal excision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Current status of surgical intervention for the management of rectal cancer. / Olson, Craig Howard.

In: Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012, p. 373-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a50152617194ea9b0fb720c112fc519,
title = "Current status of surgical intervention for the management of rectal cancer",
abstract = "Surgery for rectal cancer has advanced greatly over the past decade. Our knowledge of total mesorectal excision has led to improved oncologic outcomes. The concept of extralevator abdomino-perineal resection shows promise for reducing recurrence rates in tumors of the low rectum and anal canal. Once popular, local excision of rectal tumors has now been shown to have largely unacceptable recurrence rates. Minimally invasive techniques of laparoscopic and robotic surgery are technically feasible, and promise decreased complications in the future. Finally, new colonoscopic and endoscopic techniques offer alternatives for those unfit for surgery.",
keywords = "Abdomino-perineal resection, Laparoscopy, Proctectomy, Rectal cancer, Robotics, Total mesorectal excision",
author = "Olson, {Craig Howard}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1615/CritRevOncog.v17.i4.60",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "373--382",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis",
issn = "0893-9675",
publisher = "Begell House Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of surgical intervention for the management of rectal cancer

AU - Olson, Craig Howard

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Surgery for rectal cancer has advanced greatly over the past decade. Our knowledge of total mesorectal excision has led to improved oncologic outcomes. The concept of extralevator abdomino-perineal resection shows promise for reducing recurrence rates in tumors of the low rectum and anal canal. Once popular, local excision of rectal tumors has now been shown to have largely unacceptable recurrence rates. Minimally invasive techniques of laparoscopic and robotic surgery are technically feasible, and promise decreased complications in the future. Finally, new colonoscopic and endoscopic techniques offer alternatives for those unfit for surgery.

AB - Surgery for rectal cancer has advanced greatly over the past decade. Our knowledge of total mesorectal excision has led to improved oncologic outcomes. The concept of extralevator abdomino-perineal resection shows promise for reducing recurrence rates in tumors of the low rectum and anal canal. Once popular, local excision of rectal tumors has now been shown to have largely unacceptable recurrence rates. Minimally invasive techniques of laparoscopic and robotic surgery are technically feasible, and promise decreased complications in the future. Finally, new colonoscopic and endoscopic techniques offer alternatives for those unfit for surgery.

KW - Abdomino-perineal resection

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Proctectomy

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Robotics

KW - Total mesorectal excision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870318136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870318136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v17.i4.60

DO - 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v17.i4.60

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 373

EP - 382

JO - Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis

JF - Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis

SN - 0893-9675

IS - 4

ER -