Cystic pancreatic masses: Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up

A. J. Megibow, F. P. Lombardo, A. Guarise, G. Carbognin, J. Scholes, N. M. Rofsky, M. Macari, E. J. Balthazar, C. Procacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging features of a series of patients with cystic pancreatic masses, the majority of whom underwent imaging surveillance. Methods: Imaging data from 30 patients with known cystic pancreatic masses were reviewed. Nine patients had surgical and/or cytologic classification. Of the 21 who were not operated on, all underwent serial imaging surveillance. Of these, five had corroborative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 16 were followed by only computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: In the nonoperated group, mean follow-up time was 30 months (3-144 months). Two patients demonstrated growth, and the remainder remain stable. In the patients who underwent surgery, invasive carcinoma was found in those with lesions larger than 4 cm, involvement of the main pancreatic duct, or visible solid components on the imaging study. Smaller lesions were benign. Conclusion: In patients with suspected cystic pancreatic neoplasms, surveillance might be possible if lesions are smaller than 2.5 cm, spare the main pancreatic duct, and demonstrate no solid components.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)640-647
Number of pages8
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Ducts
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Carcinoma
Growth

Keywords

  • Cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma
  • Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
  • Pancreas cystic neoplasms
  • Pancreatic imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Megibow, A. J., Lombardo, F. P., Guarise, A., Carbognin, G., Scholes, J., Rofsky, N. M., ... Procacci, C. (2001). Cystic pancreatic masses: Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. Abdominal Imaging, 26(6), 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-001-0024-9

Cystic pancreatic masses : Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. / Megibow, A. J.; Lombardo, F. P.; Guarise, A.; Carbognin, G.; Scholes, J.; Rofsky, N. M.; Macari, M.; Balthazar, E. J.; Procacci, C.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2001, p. 640-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Megibow, AJ, Lombardo, FP, Guarise, A, Carbognin, G, Scholes, J, Rofsky, NM, Macari, M, Balthazar, EJ & Procacci, C 2001, 'Cystic pancreatic masses: Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up', Abdominal Imaging, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-001-0024-9
Megibow, A. J. ; Lombardo, F. P. ; Guarise, A. ; Carbognin, G. ; Scholes, J. ; Rofsky, N. M. ; Macari, M. ; Balthazar, E. J. ; Procacci, C. / Cystic pancreatic masses : Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2001 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 640-647.
@article{d9864e8e42a04e85883c5f692248fa23,
title = "Cystic pancreatic masses: Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up",
abstract = "Background: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging features of a series of patients with cystic pancreatic masses, the majority of whom underwent imaging surveillance. Methods: Imaging data from 30 patients with known cystic pancreatic masses were reviewed. Nine patients had surgical and/or cytologic classification. Of the 21 who were not operated on, all underwent serial imaging surveillance. Of these, five had corroborative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 16 were followed by only computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: In the nonoperated group, mean follow-up time was 30 months (3-144 months). Two patients demonstrated growth, and the remainder remain stable. In the patients who underwent surgery, invasive carcinoma was found in those with lesions larger than 4 cm, involvement of the main pancreatic duct, or visible solid components on the imaging study. Smaller lesions were benign. Conclusion: In patients with suspected cystic pancreatic neoplasms, surveillance might be possible if lesions are smaller than 2.5 cm, spare the main pancreatic duct, and demonstrate no solid components.",
keywords = "Cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma, Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, Pancreas cystic neoplasms, Pancreatic imaging",
author = "Megibow, {A. J.} and Lombardo, {F. P.} and A. Guarise and G. Carbognin and J. Scholes and Rofsky, {N. M.} and M. Macari and Balthazar, {E. J.} and C. Procacci",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-001-0024-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "640--647",
journal = "Abdominal Imaging",
issn = "0942-8925",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cystic pancreatic masses

T2 - Cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up

AU - Megibow, A. J.

AU - Lombardo, F. P.

AU - Guarise, A.

AU - Carbognin, G.

AU - Scholes, J.

AU - Rofsky, N. M.

AU - Macari, M.

AU - Balthazar, E. J.

AU - Procacci, C.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging features of a series of patients with cystic pancreatic masses, the majority of whom underwent imaging surveillance. Methods: Imaging data from 30 patients with known cystic pancreatic masses were reviewed. Nine patients had surgical and/or cytologic classification. Of the 21 who were not operated on, all underwent serial imaging surveillance. Of these, five had corroborative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 16 were followed by only computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: In the nonoperated group, mean follow-up time was 30 months (3-144 months). Two patients demonstrated growth, and the remainder remain stable. In the patients who underwent surgery, invasive carcinoma was found in those with lesions larger than 4 cm, involvement of the main pancreatic duct, or visible solid components on the imaging study. Smaller lesions were benign. Conclusion: In patients with suspected cystic pancreatic neoplasms, surveillance might be possible if lesions are smaller than 2.5 cm, spare the main pancreatic duct, and demonstrate no solid components.

AB - Background: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging features of a series of patients with cystic pancreatic masses, the majority of whom underwent imaging surveillance. Methods: Imaging data from 30 patients with known cystic pancreatic masses were reviewed. Nine patients had surgical and/or cytologic classification. Of the 21 who were not operated on, all underwent serial imaging surveillance. Of these, five had corroborative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 16 were followed by only computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: In the nonoperated group, mean follow-up time was 30 months (3-144 months). Two patients demonstrated growth, and the remainder remain stable. In the patients who underwent surgery, invasive carcinoma was found in those with lesions larger than 4 cm, involvement of the main pancreatic duct, or visible solid components on the imaging study. Smaller lesions were benign. Conclusion: In patients with suspected cystic pancreatic neoplasms, surveillance might be possible if lesions are smaller than 2.5 cm, spare the main pancreatic duct, and demonstrate no solid components.

KW - Cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma

KW - Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

KW - Pancreas cystic neoplasms

KW - Pancreatic imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035203596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035203596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-001-0024-9

DO - 10.1007/s00261-001-0024-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 11907731

AN - SCOPUS:0035203596

VL - 26

SP - 640

EP - 647

JO - Abdominal Imaging

JF - Abdominal Imaging

SN - 0942-8925

IS - 6

ER -