Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis for comparative effectiveness research-a primer

David J. Sher, Rinaa S. Punglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the analysis of real-world data is the foundation of comparative effectiveness analysis, not all clinical questions are easily approached with patient-derived information. Decision analysis is a set of modeling and analytic tools that simulate treatment and disease processes, including the incorporation of patient preferences, thus generating optimal treatment strategies for varying patient, disease, and treatment conditions. Although decision analysis is informed by evidence-derived outcomes, its ability to test treatment strategies under different conditions that are realistic but not necessarily reported in the literature makes it a useful and complementary technique to more standard data analysis. Similarly, cost-effectiveness analysis is a discipline in which the relative costs and benefits of treatment alternatives are rigorously compared. With the well-recognized increase in highly technical, costly radiation therapy technologies, the cost-effectiveness of these different treatments would come under progressively more scrutiny. In this review, we discuss the theoretical and practical aspects of decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, providing examples that highlight their methodology and utility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-24
Number of pages11
JournalSeminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Comparative Effectiveness Research
Decision Support Techniques
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Therapeutics
Patient Preference
Radiotherapy
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis for comparative effectiveness research-a primer. / Sher, David J.; Punglia, Rinaa S.

In: Seminars in Radiation Oncology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 14-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61f41aaa0cb34ee28ab23f4c591c93f8,
title = "Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis for comparative effectiveness research-a primer",
abstract = "Although the analysis of real-world data is the foundation of comparative effectiveness analysis, not all clinical questions are easily approached with patient-derived information. Decision analysis is a set of modeling and analytic tools that simulate treatment and disease processes, including the incorporation of patient preferences, thus generating optimal treatment strategies for varying patient, disease, and treatment conditions. Although decision analysis is informed by evidence-derived outcomes, its ability to test treatment strategies under different conditions that are realistic but not necessarily reported in the literature makes it a useful and complementary technique to more standard data analysis. Similarly, cost-effectiveness analysis is a discipline in which the relative costs and benefits of treatment alternatives are rigorously compared. With the well-recognized increase in highly technical, costly radiation therapy technologies, the cost-effectiveness of these different treatments would come under progressively more scrutiny. In this review, we discuss the theoretical and practical aspects of decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, providing examples that highlight their methodology and utility.",
author = "Sher, {David J.} and Punglia, {Rinaa S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "14--24",
journal = "Seminars in Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1053-4296",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis for comparative effectiveness research-a primer

AU - Sher, David J.

AU - Punglia, Rinaa S.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Although the analysis of real-world data is the foundation of comparative effectiveness analysis, not all clinical questions are easily approached with patient-derived information. Decision analysis is a set of modeling and analytic tools that simulate treatment and disease processes, including the incorporation of patient preferences, thus generating optimal treatment strategies for varying patient, disease, and treatment conditions. Although decision analysis is informed by evidence-derived outcomes, its ability to test treatment strategies under different conditions that are realistic but not necessarily reported in the literature makes it a useful and complementary technique to more standard data analysis. Similarly, cost-effectiveness analysis is a discipline in which the relative costs and benefits of treatment alternatives are rigorously compared. With the well-recognized increase in highly technical, costly radiation therapy technologies, the cost-effectiveness of these different treatments would come under progressively more scrutiny. In this review, we discuss the theoretical and practical aspects of decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, providing examples that highlight their methodology and utility.

AB - Although the analysis of real-world data is the foundation of comparative effectiveness analysis, not all clinical questions are easily approached with patient-derived information. Decision analysis is a set of modeling and analytic tools that simulate treatment and disease processes, including the incorporation of patient preferences, thus generating optimal treatment strategies for varying patient, disease, and treatment conditions. Although decision analysis is informed by evidence-derived outcomes, its ability to test treatment strategies under different conditions that are realistic but not necessarily reported in the literature makes it a useful and complementary technique to more standard data analysis. Similarly, cost-effectiveness analysis is a discipline in which the relative costs and benefits of treatment alternatives are rigorously compared. With the well-recognized increase in highly technical, costly radiation therapy technologies, the cost-effectiveness of these different treatments would come under progressively more scrutiny. In this review, we discuss the theoretical and practical aspects of decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, providing examples that highlight their methodology and utility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888858548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888858548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 24314338

AN - SCOPUS:84888858548

VL - 24

SP - 14

EP - 24

JO - Seminars in Radiation Oncology

JF - Seminars in Radiation Oncology

SN - 1053-4296

IS - 1

ER -