Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Mitchell MacHtay, Rebecca Paulus, Jennifer Moughan, Ritsuko Komaki, Jeffrey Bradley, Hak Choy, Kathy Albain, Benjamin Movsas, William T. Sause, Walter J. Curran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Local-regional control (LRC) rates for non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied (using two different definitions of LRC) for the association between LRC and survival. METHODS:: Seven legacy Radiation Therapy Ooncology Group trials of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. Two different definitions of LRC were studied: (1) freedom from local progression (FFLP-LRC), the traditional Radiation Therapy Oncology Group methodology, in which a failure is intrathoracic tumor progression by World Health Oorganization criteria; and (2) response-mandatory (strict-LRC), in which any patient not achieving at least partial response was considered to have failure at day 0. Testing for associations between LRC and survival was performed using a Cox multivariate model that included other potential predictive factors. RESULTS:: A total of 1390 patients were analyzed. The LRC rate at 3 years was 38% based on the FFLP-LRC definition and 14% based on the strict-LRC definition. Performance status, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy dose intensity (biologically equivalent dose) were associated with better LRC (using either definition). With the strict-LRC definition (but not FFLP-LRC), age was also important. There was a powerful association between LRC and overall survival (p, 0.0001) on univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, performance status, chemotherapy sequencing, and biologically equivalent dose were also significantly associated with survival. Histology and gender were also significant if the strict-LRC model was used. CONCLUSIONS:: LRC is associated with survival. The definition of LRC affects the results of these analyses. A consensus definition of LRC, incorporating functional imaging and/or central review, is needed, with the possibility of using LRC as a surrogate end point in future trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-722
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Survival
Radiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Drug Therapy
Radiation Oncology
Proportional Hazards Models
Histology
Multivariate Analysis
Biomarkers
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Local control
  • Non-small cell lung cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. / MacHtay, Mitchell; Paulus, Rebecca; Moughan, Jennifer; Komaki, Ritsuko; Bradley, Jeffrey; Choy, Hak; Albain, Kathy; Movsas, Benjamin; Sause, William T.; Curran, Walter J.

In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Vol. 7, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 716-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacHtay, M, Paulus, R, Moughan, J, Komaki, R, Bradley, J, Choy, H, Albain, K, Movsas, B, Sause, WT & Curran, WJ 2012, 'Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma', Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 716-722. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182429682
MacHtay, Mitchell ; Paulus, Rebecca ; Moughan, Jennifer ; Komaki, Ritsuko ; Bradley, Jeffrey ; Choy, Hak ; Albain, Kathy ; Movsas, Benjamin ; Sause, William T. ; Curran, Walter J. / Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 716-722.
@article{c0a2dcd44c284197bcf057ac24d4e593,
title = "Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Local-regional control (LRC) rates for non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied (using two different definitions of LRC) for the association between LRC and survival. METHODS:: Seven legacy Radiation Therapy Ooncology Group trials of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. Two different definitions of LRC were studied: (1) freedom from local progression (FFLP-LRC), the traditional Radiation Therapy Oncology Group methodology, in which a failure is intrathoracic tumor progression by World Health Oorganization criteria; and (2) response-mandatory (strict-LRC), in which any patient not achieving at least partial response was considered to have failure at day 0. Testing for associations between LRC and survival was performed using a Cox multivariate model that included other potential predictive factors. RESULTS:: A total of 1390 patients were analyzed. The LRC rate at 3 years was 38{\%} based on the FFLP-LRC definition and 14{\%} based on the strict-LRC definition. Performance status, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy dose intensity (biologically equivalent dose) were associated with better LRC (using either definition). With the strict-LRC definition (but not FFLP-LRC), age was also important. There was a powerful association between LRC and overall survival (p, 0.0001) on univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, performance status, chemotherapy sequencing, and biologically equivalent dose were also significantly associated with survival. Histology and gender were also significant if the strict-LRC model was used. CONCLUSIONS:: LRC is associated with survival. The definition of LRC affects the results of these analyses. A consensus definition of LRC, incorporating functional imaging and/or central review, is needed, with the possibility of using LRC as a surrogate end point in future trials.",
keywords = "Chemoradiotherapy, Local control, Non-small cell lung cancer",
author = "Mitchell MacHtay and Rebecca Paulus and Jennifer Moughan and Ritsuko Komaki and Jeffrey Bradley and Hak Choy and Kathy Albain and Benjamin Movsas and Sause, {William T.} and Curran, {Walter J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182429682",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "716--722",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Oncology",
issn = "1556-0864",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

AU - MacHtay, Mitchell

AU - Paulus, Rebecca

AU - Moughan, Jennifer

AU - Komaki, Ritsuko

AU - Bradley, Jeffrey

AU - Choy, Hak

AU - Albain, Kathy

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

AU - Sause, William T.

AU - Curran, Walter J.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Local-regional control (LRC) rates for non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied (using two different definitions of LRC) for the association between LRC and survival. METHODS:: Seven legacy Radiation Therapy Ooncology Group trials of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. Two different definitions of LRC were studied: (1) freedom from local progression (FFLP-LRC), the traditional Radiation Therapy Oncology Group methodology, in which a failure is intrathoracic tumor progression by World Health Oorganization criteria; and (2) response-mandatory (strict-LRC), in which any patient not achieving at least partial response was considered to have failure at day 0. Testing for associations between LRC and survival was performed using a Cox multivariate model that included other potential predictive factors. RESULTS:: A total of 1390 patients were analyzed. The LRC rate at 3 years was 38% based on the FFLP-LRC definition and 14% based on the strict-LRC definition. Performance status, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy dose intensity (biologically equivalent dose) were associated with better LRC (using either definition). With the strict-LRC definition (but not FFLP-LRC), age was also important. There was a powerful association between LRC and overall survival (p, 0.0001) on univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, performance status, chemotherapy sequencing, and biologically equivalent dose were also significantly associated with survival. Histology and gender were also significant if the strict-LRC model was used. CONCLUSIONS:: LRC is associated with survival. The definition of LRC affects the results of these analyses. A consensus definition of LRC, incorporating functional imaging and/or central review, is needed, with the possibility of using LRC as a surrogate end point in future trials.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Local-regional control (LRC) rates for non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied (using two different definitions of LRC) for the association between LRC and survival. METHODS:: Seven legacy Radiation Therapy Ooncology Group trials of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. Two different definitions of LRC were studied: (1) freedom from local progression (FFLP-LRC), the traditional Radiation Therapy Oncology Group methodology, in which a failure is intrathoracic tumor progression by World Health Oorganization criteria; and (2) response-mandatory (strict-LRC), in which any patient not achieving at least partial response was considered to have failure at day 0. Testing for associations between LRC and survival was performed using a Cox multivariate model that included other potential predictive factors. RESULTS:: A total of 1390 patients were analyzed. The LRC rate at 3 years was 38% based on the FFLP-LRC definition and 14% based on the strict-LRC definition. Performance status, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy dose intensity (biologically equivalent dose) were associated with better LRC (using either definition). With the strict-LRC definition (but not FFLP-LRC), age was also important. There was a powerful association between LRC and overall survival (p, 0.0001) on univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, performance status, chemotherapy sequencing, and biologically equivalent dose were also significantly associated with survival. Histology and gender were also significant if the strict-LRC model was used. CONCLUSIONS:: LRC is associated with survival. The definition of LRC affects the results of these analyses. A consensus definition of LRC, incorporating functional imaging and/or central review, is needed, with the possibility of using LRC as a surrogate end point in future trials.

KW - Chemoradiotherapy

KW - Local control

KW - Non-small cell lung cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858792325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858792325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182429682

DO - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182429682

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 716

EP - 722

JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

SN - 1556-0864

IS - 4

ER -