Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results

Richard Ginther, Roy Fillingham, Bruce Searles, Edward Darling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Serious complications during the performance of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) are an infrequent event. However, when potentially fatal technical complications, such as oxygenator or pump failure, do occur, it necessitates a swift and well-co-ordinated response. Periodic performances of drills that simulate various CPB crises are a way to improve individual perfusionist proficiency during disaster situations. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization of crisis management drills in perfusion departments. Every open-heart program listed by the American Hospital Association in the New England states (Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut) and New York were contacted by telephone. Of the 61 contacted, 59 participated for a response rate of 97%. Demographically, the survey represents 312 perfusionists and 47 227 cases annually. While 97% of the perfusion departments believed that regular practice and performance of crisis management drills would improve individual proficiency, only 17% of the programs mandated that their perfusionists perform crisis management drills as a matter of departmental policy. Reasons expressed for not having a formal written policy regarding performance crisis management drills were as follows: left up to the individuals to maintain proficiency 19 (39%), not motivated 11 (22%), confident of proficiency 9 (19%), no time 8 (17%), dubious value 1 (2%), and cost prohibitive 1 (2%). While it is nearly universally accepted that periodically practicing perfusion crisis management drills in a 'wet lab' environment would improve proficiency, only a minority of perfusion teams deem this a high enough priority to make it a matter of formal departmental policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-302
Number of pages4
JournalPerfusion
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Mandrillus
Perfusion
management
performance
American Hospital Association
Oxygenators
Lung
New England
Disasters
Telephone
telephone
Surveys and Questionnaires
disaster
utilization
minority
Pumps
Costs and Cost Analysis
event
costs
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Ginther, R., Fillingham, R., Searles, B., & Darling, E. (2003). Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results. Perfusion, 18(5), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267659103pf680oa

Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills : 2002 survey results. / Ginther, Richard; Fillingham, Roy; Searles, Bruce; Darling, Edward.

In: Perfusion, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2003, p. 299-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ginther, R, Fillingham, R, Searles, B & Darling, E 2003, 'Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results', Perfusion, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267659103pf680oa
Ginther, Richard ; Fillingham, Roy ; Searles, Bruce ; Darling, Edward. / Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills : 2002 survey results. In: Perfusion. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 299-302.
@article{a4b6ff8e0988402599cc81850fe36cba,
title = "Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results",
abstract = "Serious complications during the performance of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) are an infrequent event. However, when potentially fatal technical complications, such as oxygenator or pump failure, do occur, it necessitates a swift and well-co-ordinated response. Periodic performances of drills that simulate various CPB crises are a way to improve individual perfusionist proficiency during disaster situations. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization of crisis management drills in perfusion departments. Every open-heart program listed by the American Hospital Association in the New England states (Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut) and New York were contacted by telephone. Of the 61 contacted, 59 participated for a response rate of 97{\%}. Demographically, the survey represents 312 perfusionists and 47 227 cases annually. While 97{\%} of the perfusion departments believed that regular practice and performance of crisis management drills would improve individual proficiency, only 17{\%} of the programs mandated that their perfusionists perform crisis management drills as a matter of departmental policy. Reasons expressed for not having a formal written policy regarding performance crisis management drills were as follows: left up to the individuals to maintain proficiency 19 (39{\%}), not motivated 11 (22{\%}), confident of proficiency 9 (19{\%}), no time 8 (17{\%}), dubious value 1 (2{\%}), and cost prohibitive 1 (2{\%}). While it is nearly universally accepted that periodically practicing perfusion crisis management drills in a 'wet lab' environment would improve proficiency, only a minority of perfusion teams deem this a high enough priority to make it a matter of formal departmental policy.",
author = "Richard Ginther and Roy Fillingham and Bruce Searles and Edward Darling",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1191/0267659103pf680oa",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "299--302",
journal = "Perfusion (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0267-6591",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills

T2 - 2002 survey results

AU - Ginther, Richard

AU - Fillingham, Roy

AU - Searles, Bruce

AU - Darling, Edward

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Serious complications during the performance of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) are an infrequent event. However, when potentially fatal technical complications, such as oxygenator or pump failure, do occur, it necessitates a swift and well-co-ordinated response. Periodic performances of drills that simulate various CPB crises are a way to improve individual perfusionist proficiency during disaster situations. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization of crisis management drills in perfusion departments. Every open-heart program listed by the American Hospital Association in the New England states (Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut) and New York were contacted by telephone. Of the 61 contacted, 59 participated for a response rate of 97%. Demographically, the survey represents 312 perfusionists and 47 227 cases annually. While 97% of the perfusion departments believed that regular practice and performance of crisis management drills would improve individual proficiency, only 17% of the programs mandated that their perfusionists perform crisis management drills as a matter of departmental policy. Reasons expressed for not having a formal written policy regarding performance crisis management drills were as follows: left up to the individuals to maintain proficiency 19 (39%), not motivated 11 (22%), confident of proficiency 9 (19%), no time 8 (17%), dubious value 1 (2%), and cost prohibitive 1 (2%). While it is nearly universally accepted that periodically practicing perfusion crisis management drills in a 'wet lab' environment would improve proficiency, only a minority of perfusion teams deem this a high enough priority to make it a matter of formal departmental policy.

AB - Serious complications during the performance of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) are an infrequent event. However, when potentially fatal technical complications, such as oxygenator or pump failure, do occur, it necessitates a swift and well-co-ordinated response. Periodic performances of drills that simulate various CPB crises are a way to improve individual perfusionist proficiency during disaster situations. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization of crisis management drills in perfusion departments. Every open-heart program listed by the American Hospital Association in the New England states (Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut) and New York were contacted by telephone. Of the 61 contacted, 59 participated for a response rate of 97%. Demographically, the survey represents 312 perfusionists and 47 227 cases annually. While 97% of the perfusion departments believed that regular practice and performance of crisis management drills would improve individual proficiency, only 17% of the programs mandated that their perfusionists perform crisis management drills as a matter of departmental policy. Reasons expressed for not having a formal written policy regarding performance crisis management drills were as follows: left up to the individuals to maintain proficiency 19 (39%), not motivated 11 (22%), confident of proficiency 9 (19%), no time 8 (17%), dubious value 1 (2%), and cost prohibitive 1 (2%). While it is nearly universally accepted that periodically practicing perfusion crisis management drills in a 'wet lab' environment would improve proficiency, only a minority of perfusion teams deem this a high enough priority to make it a matter of formal departmental policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242720730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242720730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0267659103pf680oa

DO - 10.1191/0267659103pf680oa

M3 - Article

C2 - 14604247

AN - SCOPUS:0242720730

VL - 18

SP - 299

EP - 302

JO - Perfusion (United Kingdom)

JF - Perfusion (United Kingdom)

SN - 0267-6591

IS - 5

ER -