Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: Implications for medical informatics

Jen Hsiang Chuang, George Hripcsak, Daniel F. Heitjan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In medical informatics research, study questions frequently involve individuals who are grouped into clusters. For example, an intervention may be aimed at a clinician (who treats a cluster of patients) with the intention of improving the health of individual patients. Correlation among individuals within a cluster can lead to incorrect estimates of the sample size required to detect an effect and inappropriate estimates of the confidence intervals and the statistical significance of the intervention effects. Contamination, which is the spread of the effect of an intervention or control treatment to the opposite group, often occurs between individuals within clusters. It leads to an attenuation of the effect of the intervention and reduced power to detect a difference. If individuals are randomized in a clinical trial (individual-randomized trial), then correlation must be taken into account in the analysis, and the sample size may need to be increased to compensate for contamination. Randomizing clusters rather than individuals (cluster-randomized trials) can eliminate contamination and may be preferred for logistical reasons. Cluster-randomized trials are generally less efficient than individual-randomized trials, so the tradeoffs must be assessed. Correlation must be taken into account in the analysis and in the sample-size calculations for cluster-randomized trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-238
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2002

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Sample Size
Biomedical Research
Clinical Trials
Confidence Intervals
Health
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments : Implications for medical informatics. / Chuang, Jen Hsiang; Hripcsak, George; Heitjan, Daniel F.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.05.2002, p. 230-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2834cd7a5a55428584f065ade5be1831,
title = "Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: Implications for medical informatics",
abstract = "In medical informatics research, study questions frequently involve individuals who are grouped into clusters. For example, an intervention may be aimed at a clinician (who treats a cluster of patients) with the intention of improving the health of individual patients. Correlation among individuals within a cluster can lead to incorrect estimates of the sample size required to detect an effect and inappropriate estimates of the confidence intervals and the statistical significance of the intervention effects. Contamination, which is the spread of the effect of an intervention or control treatment to the opposite group, often occurs between individuals within clusters. It leads to an attenuation of the effect of the intervention and reduced power to detect a difference. If individuals are randomized in a clinical trial (individual-randomized trial), then correlation must be taken into account in the analysis, and the sample size may need to be increased to compensate for contamination. Randomizing clusters rather than individuals (cluster-randomized trials) can eliminate contamination and may be preferred for logistical reasons. Cluster-randomized trials are generally less efficient than individual-randomized trials, so the tradeoffs must be assessed. Correlation must be taken into account in the analysis and in the sample-size calculations for cluster-randomized trials.",
author = "Chuang, {Jen Hsiang} and George Hripcsak and Heitjan, {Daniel F.}",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M0997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "230--238",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments

T2 - Implications for medical informatics

AU - Chuang, Jen Hsiang

AU - Hripcsak, George

AU - Heitjan, Daniel F.

PY - 2002/5/1

Y1 - 2002/5/1

N2 - In medical informatics research, study questions frequently involve individuals who are grouped into clusters. For example, an intervention may be aimed at a clinician (who treats a cluster of patients) with the intention of improving the health of individual patients. Correlation among individuals within a cluster can lead to incorrect estimates of the sample size required to detect an effect and inappropriate estimates of the confidence intervals and the statistical significance of the intervention effects. Contamination, which is the spread of the effect of an intervention or control treatment to the opposite group, often occurs between individuals within clusters. It leads to an attenuation of the effect of the intervention and reduced power to detect a difference. If individuals are randomized in a clinical trial (individual-randomized trial), then correlation must be taken into account in the analysis, and the sample size may need to be increased to compensate for contamination. Randomizing clusters rather than individuals (cluster-randomized trials) can eliminate contamination and may be preferred for logistical reasons. Cluster-randomized trials are generally less efficient than individual-randomized trials, so the tradeoffs must be assessed. Correlation must be taken into account in the analysis and in the sample-size calculations for cluster-randomized trials.

AB - In medical informatics research, study questions frequently involve individuals who are grouped into clusters. For example, an intervention may be aimed at a clinician (who treats a cluster of patients) with the intention of improving the health of individual patients. Correlation among individuals within a cluster can lead to incorrect estimates of the sample size required to detect an effect and inappropriate estimates of the confidence intervals and the statistical significance of the intervention effects. Contamination, which is the spread of the effect of an intervention or control treatment to the opposite group, often occurs between individuals within clusters. It leads to an attenuation of the effect of the intervention and reduced power to detect a difference. If individuals are randomized in a clinical trial (individual-randomized trial), then correlation must be taken into account in the analysis, and the sample size may need to be increased to compensate for contamination. Randomizing clusters rather than individuals (cluster-randomized trials) can eliminate contamination and may be preferred for logistical reasons. Cluster-randomized trials are generally less efficient than individual-randomized trials, so the tradeoffs must be assessed. Correlation must be taken into account in the analysis and in the sample-size calculations for cluster-randomized trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036581738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036581738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M0997

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M0997

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11971884

AN - SCOPUS:0036581738

VL - 9

SP - 230

EP - 238

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -