Design, Implementation, and Assessment of a Public Comprehensive Specialty Care Program for Early Psychosis

Carol S North, Zorica Simic, John Burruss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Promising outcomes from early psychosis intervention programs have prompted implementation of early psychosis initiatives nationwide through federal and state funding. The Enhanced Program for Early Psychosis (ePEP) model in north Texas is among the first, if not the first, of these state-funded initiatives to provide detailed reporting of its development and implementation. METHODS: Restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria with a 1% eligibility rate resulted in a highly disadvantaged, predominantly minority sample with low educational attainment, prevalent mood disorders and substance misuse, and criminal justice involvement. Program progress was assessed over 1 year through structured diagnostic assessments and measures of psychotic symptoms, depression and anxiety symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and service utilization and costs. RESULTS: Implementation challenges included strict income/insurance inclusion and disqualification criteria for program participation, hiring and staff turnover problems, client transportation, and lack of available family to participate in family interventions. Despite these challenges, patients showed reduction in negative psychotic symptoms, hospitalization rates decreased from 29% to 5%, full-time employment improved from 6% to 24%, and probation/parole decreased from 24% to 5%. The mean 1-year per-patient cost was $10,639. Reduced negative symptoms and hospitalizations were associated with service use. DISCUSSION: The development and implementation of this pioneering state-funded early psychosis program, based on the National Institute of Mental Health's Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) initiative, provide experience and results to inform the implementation of future programs. Its demonstrated success, in spite of many implementation challenges, suggests the potential for future research, including randomized controlled trials to demonstrate substantial benefit and cost-effectiveness of early psychosis programs in real-world settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-102
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of psychiatric practice
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Hospitalization
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Costs and Cost Analysis
Criminal Law
Vulnerable Populations
Insurance
Mood Disorders
Schizophrenia
Anxiety
Randomized Controlled Trials
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Design, Implementation, and Assessment of a Public Comprehensive Specialty Care Program for Early Psychosis. / North, Carol S; Simic, Zorica; Burruss, John.

In: Journal of psychiatric practice, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 91-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e8e430034f04ba5ac4d46284d6b0544,
title = "Design, Implementation, and Assessment of a Public Comprehensive Specialty Care Program for Early Psychosis",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Promising outcomes from early psychosis intervention programs have prompted implementation of early psychosis initiatives nationwide through federal and state funding. The Enhanced Program for Early Psychosis (ePEP) model in north Texas is among the first, if not the first, of these state-funded initiatives to provide detailed reporting of its development and implementation. METHODS: Restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria with a 1{\%} eligibility rate resulted in a highly disadvantaged, predominantly minority sample with low educational attainment, prevalent mood disorders and substance misuse, and criminal justice involvement. Program progress was assessed over 1 year through structured diagnostic assessments and measures of psychotic symptoms, depression and anxiety symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and service utilization and costs. RESULTS: Implementation challenges included strict income/insurance inclusion and disqualification criteria for program participation, hiring and staff turnover problems, client transportation, and lack of available family to participate in family interventions. Despite these challenges, patients showed reduction in negative psychotic symptoms, hospitalization rates decreased from 29{\%} to 5{\%}, full-time employment improved from 6{\%} to 24{\%}, and probation/parole decreased from 24{\%} to 5{\%}. The mean 1-year per-patient cost was $10,639. Reduced negative symptoms and hospitalizations were associated with service use. DISCUSSION: The development and implementation of this pioneering state-funded early psychosis program, based on the National Institute of Mental Health's Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) initiative, provide experience and results to inform the implementation of future programs. Its demonstrated success, in spite of many implementation challenges, suggests the potential for future research, including randomized controlled trials to demonstrate substantial benefit and cost-effectiveness of early psychosis programs in real-world settings.",
author = "North, {Carol S} and Zorica Simic and John Burruss",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRA.0000000000000364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "91--102",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Practice",
issn = "1527-4160",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design, Implementation, and Assessment of a Public Comprehensive Specialty Care Program for Early Psychosis

AU - North, Carol S

AU - Simic, Zorica

AU - Burruss, John

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Promising outcomes from early psychosis intervention programs have prompted implementation of early psychosis initiatives nationwide through federal and state funding. The Enhanced Program for Early Psychosis (ePEP) model in north Texas is among the first, if not the first, of these state-funded initiatives to provide detailed reporting of its development and implementation. METHODS: Restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria with a 1% eligibility rate resulted in a highly disadvantaged, predominantly minority sample with low educational attainment, prevalent mood disorders and substance misuse, and criminal justice involvement. Program progress was assessed over 1 year through structured diagnostic assessments and measures of psychotic symptoms, depression and anxiety symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and service utilization and costs. RESULTS: Implementation challenges included strict income/insurance inclusion and disqualification criteria for program participation, hiring and staff turnover problems, client transportation, and lack of available family to participate in family interventions. Despite these challenges, patients showed reduction in negative psychotic symptoms, hospitalization rates decreased from 29% to 5%, full-time employment improved from 6% to 24%, and probation/parole decreased from 24% to 5%. The mean 1-year per-patient cost was $10,639. Reduced negative symptoms and hospitalizations were associated with service use. DISCUSSION: The development and implementation of this pioneering state-funded early psychosis program, based on the National Institute of Mental Health's Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) initiative, provide experience and results to inform the implementation of future programs. Its demonstrated success, in spite of many implementation challenges, suggests the potential for future research, including randomized controlled trials to demonstrate substantial benefit and cost-effectiveness of early psychosis programs in real-world settings.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Promising outcomes from early psychosis intervention programs have prompted implementation of early psychosis initiatives nationwide through federal and state funding. The Enhanced Program for Early Psychosis (ePEP) model in north Texas is among the first, if not the first, of these state-funded initiatives to provide detailed reporting of its development and implementation. METHODS: Restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria with a 1% eligibility rate resulted in a highly disadvantaged, predominantly minority sample with low educational attainment, prevalent mood disorders and substance misuse, and criminal justice involvement. Program progress was assessed over 1 year through structured diagnostic assessments and measures of psychotic symptoms, depression and anxiety symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and service utilization and costs. RESULTS: Implementation challenges included strict income/insurance inclusion and disqualification criteria for program participation, hiring and staff turnover problems, client transportation, and lack of available family to participate in family interventions. Despite these challenges, patients showed reduction in negative psychotic symptoms, hospitalization rates decreased from 29% to 5%, full-time employment improved from 6% to 24%, and probation/parole decreased from 24% to 5%. The mean 1-year per-patient cost was $10,639. Reduced negative symptoms and hospitalizations were associated with service use. DISCUSSION: The development and implementation of this pioneering state-funded early psychosis program, based on the National Institute of Mental Health's Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) initiative, provide experience and results to inform the implementation of future programs. Its demonstrated success, in spite of many implementation challenges, suggests the potential for future research, including randomized controlled trials to demonstrate substantial benefit and cost-effectiveness of early psychosis programs in real-world settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062624626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062624626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000364

DO - 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000364

M3 - Article

C2 - 30849057

AN - SCOPUS:85062624626

VL - 25

SP - 91

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

SN - 1527-4160

IS - 2

ER -