Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery

B. Stephens Richards, James O. Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. Review article regarding the development of outcome measures for pediatric spinal deformity. OBJECTIVE. To discuss the role of patient-based outcomes and process measures in pediatric spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. A number of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires assess, from patients' perspectives, the effectiveness of spinal deformity correction. The SRS instrument is the most prominent HRQOL tool used in North American adolescent scoliosis studies today. However, these patient-based outcomes and perceptions do not necessarily correlate with process measurements, particularly in the area of increase spinal deformity correction being achieved with newer, more powerful, pedicle screw instrumentation. Furthermore, spinal deformity presenting during infancy or early childhood poses a particular challenge for developing useful evidence-based outcomes tools. METHODS. The rationale for patient-based outcome development in pediatric spinal deformity is discussed, along with its important association with process measures. RESULTS. Newer HRQOL tools are under development that may better recognize and differentiate changes in adolescent patients' appearances before and after surgery. For early-onset spinal deformity patients, newer process measures for periodic outcome assessment, such as volume measurement of lung parenchyma and spine/chest cage measurement, are being developed. CONCLUSION. Ultimately, both patient and process measures are necessary to fully evaluate the results of pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSpine
Volume32
Issue number19 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Quality of Life
Lung Volume Measurements
Scoliosis
Spine
Thorax

Keywords

  • Patient-based outcomes
  • Pediatric spinal deformity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery. / Richards, B. Stephens; Sanders, James O.

In: Spine, Vol. 32, No. 19 SUPPL., 09.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richards, B. Stephens ; Sanders, James O. / Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery. In: Spine. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 19 SUPPL.
@article{ba0393cf9e324fdaa639a8a408b30e2d,
title = "Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN. Review article regarding the development of outcome measures for pediatric spinal deformity. OBJECTIVE. To discuss the role of patient-based outcomes and process measures in pediatric spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. A number of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires assess, from patients' perspectives, the effectiveness of spinal deformity correction. The SRS instrument is the most prominent HRQOL tool used in North American adolescent scoliosis studies today. However, these patient-based outcomes and perceptions do not necessarily correlate with process measurements, particularly in the area of increase spinal deformity correction being achieved with newer, more powerful, pedicle screw instrumentation. Furthermore, spinal deformity presenting during infancy or early childhood poses a particular challenge for developing useful evidence-based outcomes tools. METHODS. The rationale for patient-based outcome development in pediatric spinal deformity is discussed, along with its important association with process measures. RESULTS. Newer HRQOL tools are under development that may better recognize and differentiate changes in adolescent patients' appearances before and after surgery. For early-onset spinal deformity patients, newer process measures for periodic outcome assessment, such as volume measurement of lung parenchyma and spine/chest cage measurement, are being developed. CONCLUSION. Ultimately, both patient and process measures are necessary to fully evaluate the results of pediatric spinal deformity surgery.",
keywords = "Patient-based outcomes, Pediatric spinal deformity",
author = "Richards, {B. Stephens} and Sanders, {James O.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea57",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "19 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery

AU - Richards, B. Stephens

AU - Sanders, James O.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - STUDY DESIGN. Review article regarding the development of outcome measures for pediatric spinal deformity. OBJECTIVE. To discuss the role of patient-based outcomes and process measures in pediatric spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. A number of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires assess, from patients' perspectives, the effectiveness of spinal deformity correction. The SRS instrument is the most prominent HRQOL tool used in North American adolescent scoliosis studies today. However, these patient-based outcomes and perceptions do not necessarily correlate with process measurements, particularly in the area of increase spinal deformity correction being achieved with newer, more powerful, pedicle screw instrumentation. Furthermore, spinal deformity presenting during infancy or early childhood poses a particular challenge for developing useful evidence-based outcomes tools. METHODS. The rationale for patient-based outcome development in pediatric spinal deformity is discussed, along with its important association with process measures. RESULTS. Newer HRQOL tools are under development that may better recognize and differentiate changes in adolescent patients' appearances before and after surgery. For early-onset spinal deformity patients, newer process measures for periodic outcome assessment, such as volume measurement of lung parenchyma and spine/chest cage measurement, are being developed. CONCLUSION. Ultimately, both patient and process measures are necessary to fully evaluate the results of pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

AB - STUDY DESIGN. Review article regarding the development of outcome measures for pediatric spinal deformity. OBJECTIVE. To discuss the role of patient-based outcomes and process measures in pediatric spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. A number of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires assess, from patients' perspectives, the effectiveness of spinal deformity correction. The SRS instrument is the most prominent HRQOL tool used in North American adolescent scoliosis studies today. However, these patient-based outcomes and perceptions do not necessarily correlate with process measurements, particularly in the area of increase spinal deformity correction being achieved with newer, more powerful, pedicle screw instrumentation. Furthermore, spinal deformity presenting during infancy or early childhood poses a particular challenge for developing useful evidence-based outcomes tools. METHODS. The rationale for patient-based outcome development in pediatric spinal deformity is discussed, along with its important association with process measures. RESULTS. Newer HRQOL tools are under development that may better recognize and differentiate changes in adolescent patients' appearances before and after surgery. For early-onset spinal deformity patients, newer process measures for periodic outcome assessment, such as volume measurement of lung parenchyma and spine/chest cage measurement, are being developed. CONCLUSION. Ultimately, both patient and process measures are necessary to fully evaluate the results of pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

KW - Patient-based outcomes

KW - Pediatric spinal deformity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548309190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548309190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea57

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea57

M3 - Article

C2 - 17728685

AN - SCOPUS:34548309190

VL - 32

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 19 SUPPL.

ER -