Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation

Dimitris Bertsimas, Jerry Kung, Nikolaos Trichakis, Yuchen Wang, Ryutaro Hirose, Parsia A. Vagefi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used to rank liver transplant candidates. However, despite numerous revisions, MELD allocation still does not allow for equitable access to all waitlisted candidates. An optimized prediction of mortality (OPOM) was developed (http://www.opom.online) utilizing machine-learning optimal classification tree models trained to predict a candidate's 3-month waitlist mortality or removal utilizing the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) dataset. The Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM) was then used to compare OPOM to MELD-based allocation. Out-of-sample area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated for candidate groups of increasing disease severity. OPOM allocation, when compared to MELD, reduced mortality on average by 417.96 (406.8-428.4) deaths every year in LSAM analysis. Improved survival was noted across all candidate demographics, diagnoses, and geographic regions. OPOM delivered a substantially higher AUC across all disease severity groups. OPOM more accurately and objectively prioritizes candidates for liver transplantation based on disease severity, allowing for more equitable allocation of livers with a resultant significant number of additional lives saved every year. These data demonstrate the potential of machine learning technology to help guide clinical practice, and potentially guide national policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1109-1118
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Liver Transplantation
End Stage Liver Disease
Mortality
Liver
Area Under Curve
Transplants
Demography
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • ethics and public policy
  • liver transplantation/hepatology
  • liver transplantation: auxiliary
  • simulation
  • statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Transplantation
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation. / Bertsimas, Dimitris; Kung, Jerry; Trichakis, Nikolaos; Wang, Yuchen; Hirose, Ryutaro; Vagefi, Parsia A.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2019, p. 1109-1118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bertsimas, Dimitris ; Kung, Jerry ; Trichakis, Nikolaos ; Wang, Yuchen ; Hirose, Ryutaro ; Vagefi, Parsia A. / Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation. In: American Journal of Transplantation. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 1109-1118.
@article{18c29344270b4039a928632f515f9468,
title = "Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation",
abstract = "Since 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used to rank liver transplant candidates. However, despite numerous revisions, MELD allocation still does not allow for equitable access to all waitlisted candidates. An optimized prediction of mortality (OPOM) was developed (http://www.opom.online) utilizing machine-learning optimal classification tree models trained to predict a candidate's 3-month waitlist mortality or removal utilizing the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) dataset. The Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM) was then used to compare OPOM to MELD-based allocation. Out-of-sample area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated for candidate groups of increasing disease severity. OPOM allocation, when compared to MELD, reduced mortality on average by 417.96 (406.8-428.4) deaths every year in LSAM analysis. Improved survival was noted across all candidate demographics, diagnoses, and geographic regions. OPOM delivered a substantially higher AUC across all disease severity groups. OPOM more accurately and objectively prioritizes candidates for liver transplantation based on disease severity, allowing for more equitable allocation of livers with a resultant significant number of additional lives saved every year. These data demonstrate the potential of machine learning technology to help guide clinical practice, and potentially guide national policy.",
keywords = "ethics and public policy, liver transplantation/hepatology, liver transplantation: auxiliary, simulation, statistics",
author = "Dimitris Bertsimas and Jerry Kung and Nikolaos Trichakis and Yuchen Wang and Ryutaro Hirose and Vagefi, {Parsia A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/ajt.15172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1109--1118",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation

AU - Bertsimas, Dimitris

AU - Kung, Jerry

AU - Trichakis, Nikolaos

AU - Wang, Yuchen

AU - Hirose, Ryutaro

AU - Vagefi, Parsia A.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Since 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used to rank liver transplant candidates. However, despite numerous revisions, MELD allocation still does not allow for equitable access to all waitlisted candidates. An optimized prediction of mortality (OPOM) was developed (http://www.opom.online) utilizing machine-learning optimal classification tree models trained to predict a candidate's 3-month waitlist mortality or removal utilizing the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) dataset. The Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM) was then used to compare OPOM to MELD-based allocation. Out-of-sample area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated for candidate groups of increasing disease severity. OPOM allocation, when compared to MELD, reduced mortality on average by 417.96 (406.8-428.4) deaths every year in LSAM analysis. Improved survival was noted across all candidate demographics, diagnoses, and geographic regions. OPOM delivered a substantially higher AUC across all disease severity groups. OPOM more accurately and objectively prioritizes candidates for liver transplantation based on disease severity, allowing for more equitable allocation of livers with a resultant significant number of additional lives saved every year. These data demonstrate the potential of machine learning technology to help guide clinical practice, and potentially guide national policy.

AB - Since 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used to rank liver transplant candidates. However, despite numerous revisions, MELD allocation still does not allow for equitable access to all waitlisted candidates. An optimized prediction of mortality (OPOM) was developed (http://www.opom.online) utilizing machine-learning optimal classification tree models trained to predict a candidate's 3-month waitlist mortality or removal utilizing the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) dataset. The Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM) was then used to compare OPOM to MELD-based allocation. Out-of-sample area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated for candidate groups of increasing disease severity. OPOM allocation, when compared to MELD, reduced mortality on average by 417.96 (406.8-428.4) deaths every year in LSAM analysis. Improved survival was noted across all candidate demographics, diagnoses, and geographic regions. OPOM delivered a substantially higher AUC across all disease severity groups. OPOM more accurately and objectively prioritizes candidates for liver transplantation based on disease severity, allowing for more equitable allocation of livers with a resultant significant number of additional lives saved every year. These data demonstrate the potential of machine learning technology to help guide clinical practice, and potentially guide national policy.

KW - ethics and public policy

KW - liver transplantation/hepatology

KW - liver transplantation: auxiliary

KW - simulation

KW - statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057967735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057967735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajt.15172

DO - 10.1111/ajt.15172

M3 - Article

C2 - 30411495

AN - SCOPUS:85057967735

VL - 19

SP - 1109

EP - 1118

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 4

ER -