Development of ASMBS research agenda for bariatric surgery using the Delphi methodology

Dimitrios Stefanidis, Wendy C. King, Nancy Puzziferri, Annabelle R. Butler, Matthew Hutter, Ranjan Sudan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While the number of research publications related to bariatric surgery have increased remarkably in the past decade, research efforts remain uncoordinated and have limited focus, and numerous important questions remain unanswered. Objective: To generate a research agenda in bariatric surgery. Setting: National survey. Methods: The membership of the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) was asked to submit research questions needed to advance the field of bariatric surgery. An expert panel grouped and collated submitted questions and redistributed them back to the membership to rate their importance on a 5-point Likert scale using a 3-round modified Delphi methodology. The top research questions were determined based on provided rankings. Results: Two hundred ninety-two research questions were initially submitted that were collapsed to 59 unique questions. The ratings for the top 40 questions ranged from 2.67–4.33 (overall mean, 3.46). The highest-ranked questions centered on the mechanisms of effectiveness of bariatric surgery for weight loss and diabetes resolution, the underlying etiology of weight recidivism, and predictors of success. Conclusions: A research agenda for bariatric surgery was developed using the Delphi methodology. This research agenda may enhance the ability of investigators and funding organizations, including the ASMBS, to focus attention to areas most likely to advance the field, and by editors and reviewers to assess the merit and relevance of scientific contributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bariatric Surgery
Research
Publications
Weight Loss
Research Personnel
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Delphi process
  • Research agenda
  • Research priorities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Development of ASMBS research agenda for bariatric surgery using the Delphi methodology. / Stefanidis, Dimitrios; King, Wendy C.; Puzziferri, Nancy; Butler, Annabelle R.; Hutter, Matthew; Sudan, Ranjan.

In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stefanidis, Dimitrios ; King, Wendy C. ; Puzziferri, Nancy ; Butler, Annabelle R. ; Hutter, Matthew ; Sudan, Ranjan. / Development of ASMBS research agenda for bariatric surgery using the Delphi methodology. In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2019.
@article{9b896ce9c7f04ef9a48374bc9cba5c6d,
title = "Development of ASMBS research agenda for bariatric surgery using the Delphi methodology",
abstract = "Background: While the number of research publications related to bariatric surgery have increased remarkably in the past decade, research efforts remain uncoordinated and have limited focus, and numerous important questions remain unanswered. Objective: To generate a research agenda in bariatric surgery. Setting: National survey. Methods: The membership of the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) was asked to submit research questions needed to advance the field of bariatric surgery. An expert panel grouped and collated submitted questions and redistributed them back to the membership to rate their importance on a 5-point Likert scale using a 3-round modified Delphi methodology. The top research questions were determined based on provided rankings. Results: Two hundred ninety-two research questions were initially submitted that were collapsed to 59 unique questions. The ratings for the top 40 questions ranged from 2.67–4.33 (overall mean, 3.46). The highest-ranked questions centered on the mechanisms of effectiveness of bariatric surgery for weight loss and diabetes resolution, the underlying etiology of weight recidivism, and predictors of success. Conclusions: A research agenda for bariatric surgery was developed using the Delphi methodology. This research agenda may enhance the ability of investigators and funding organizations, including the ASMBS, to focus attention to areas most likely to advance the field, and by editors and reviewers to assess the merit and relevance of scientific contributions.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Delphi process, Research agenda, Research priorities",
author = "Dimitrios Stefanidis and King, {Wendy C.} and Nancy Puzziferri and Butler, {Annabelle R.} and Matthew Hutter and Ranjan Sudan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.043",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases",
issn = "1550-7289",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of ASMBS research agenda for bariatric surgery using the Delphi methodology

AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios

AU - King, Wendy C.

AU - Puzziferri, Nancy

AU - Butler, Annabelle R.

AU - Hutter, Matthew

AU - Sudan, Ranjan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: While the number of research publications related to bariatric surgery have increased remarkably in the past decade, research efforts remain uncoordinated and have limited focus, and numerous important questions remain unanswered. Objective: To generate a research agenda in bariatric surgery. Setting: National survey. Methods: The membership of the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) was asked to submit research questions needed to advance the field of bariatric surgery. An expert panel grouped and collated submitted questions and redistributed them back to the membership to rate their importance on a 5-point Likert scale using a 3-round modified Delphi methodology. The top research questions were determined based on provided rankings. Results: Two hundred ninety-two research questions were initially submitted that were collapsed to 59 unique questions. The ratings for the top 40 questions ranged from 2.67–4.33 (overall mean, 3.46). The highest-ranked questions centered on the mechanisms of effectiveness of bariatric surgery for weight loss and diabetes resolution, the underlying etiology of weight recidivism, and predictors of success. Conclusions: A research agenda for bariatric surgery was developed using the Delphi methodology. This research agenda may enhance the ability of investigators and funding organizations, including the ASMBS, to focus attention to areas most likely to advance the field, and by editors and reviewers to assess the merit and relevance of scientific contributions.

AB - Background: While the number of research publications related to bariatric surgery have increased remarkably in the past decade, research efforts remain uncoordinated and have limited focus, and numerous important questions remain unanswered. Objective: To generate a research agenda in bariatric surgery. Setting: National survey. Methods: The membership of the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) was asked to submit research questions needed to advance the field of bariatric surgery. An expert panel grouped and collated submitted questions and redistributed them back to the membership to rate their importance on a 5-point Likert scale using a 3-round modified Delphi methodology. The top research questions were determined based on provided rankings. Results: Two hundred ninety-two research questions were initially submitted that were collapsed to 59 unique questions. The ratings for the top 40 questions ranged from 2.67–4.33 (overall mean, 3.46). The highest-ranked questions centered on the mechanisms of effectiveness of bariatric surgery for weight loss and diabetes resolution, the underlying etiology of weight recidivism, and predictors of success. Conclusions: A research agenda for bariatric surgery was developed using the Delphi methodology. This research agenda may enhance the ability of investigators and funding organizations, including the ASMBS, to focus attention to areas most likely to advance the field, and by editors and reviewers to assess the merit and relevance of scientific contributions.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Delphi process

KW - Research agenda

KW - Research priorities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071072363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071072363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.043

DO - 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 31466874

AN - SCOPUS:85071072363

JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

SN - 1550-7289

ER -