Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine

Amer Shakil, Jacqueline Bardwell, Kevin Sherin, James M. Sinacore, Robert Zitter, Tiffany B. Kindratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Researchers in intimate partner violence (IPV) screening have developed a short written tool called HITS. The acronym corresponds to questions that elicit information about how often a woman's male partner physically Hurts, Insults, Threatens harm, and Screams at her. The purpose of this study was to develop a verbal form of the HITS and to compare it to the published written version. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from prior HITS research was conducted. From this, the screening questions were modified for oral presentation so that patients could respond with a yes or no answer. To test the comparability of the two screening formats, 103 adult female patients completed both forms of the HITS during routine office visits. Phase one of this study used Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) on 210 cases from prior HITS research to create a cut score that differentiates clinic patients from self-identified victims of abuse. From this, written HITS questions were modi-fied for verbal administration. Phase two of this study used t test, ANOVA, and classification of two screening formats to compare the written and verbal HITS administered to 103 adult female family medicine patients. RESULTS: Responses to both types of screening were related. The mean score on the written HITS was statistically higher for respondents who reported "yes" to a Verbal HITS question. This was consistent across all four questions. Also, the mean written HITS score increased linearly as a function of the number of yes answers on the Verbal HITS. The screening classification (positive, negative) from both forms of the HITS was the same for 83% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The verbal and written HITS comprise two ways that clinicians can screen for domestic violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume46
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Medicine
Office Visits
Domestic Violence
Research
Analysis of Variance
Research Personnel
Intimate Partner Violence
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Shakil, A., Bardwell, J., Sherin, K., Sinacore, J. M., Zitter, R., & Kindratt, T. B. (2014). Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine. Family Medicine, 46(3), 180-185.

Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine. / Shakil, Amer; Bardwell, Jacqueline; Sherin, Kevin; Sinacore, James M.; Zitter, Robert; Kindratt, Tiffany B.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2014, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shakil, A, Bardwell, J, Sherin, K, Sinacore, JM, Zitter, R & Kindratt, TB 2014, 'Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine', Family Medicine, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 180-185.
Shakil A, Bardwell J, Sherin K, Sinacore JM, Zitter R, Kindratt TB. Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine. Family Medicine. 2014;46(3):180-185.
Shakil, Amer ; Bardwell, Jacqueline ; Sherin, Kevin ; Sinacore, James M. ; Zitter, Robert ; Kindratt, Tiffany B. / Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine. In: Family Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 180-185.
@article{743190b31c044a9cae63fb1798fb93b1,
title = "Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Researchers in intimate partner violence (IPV) screening have developed a short written tool called HITS. The acronym corresponds to questions that elicit information about how often a woman's male partner physically Hurts, Insults, Threatens harm, and Screams at her. The purpose of this study was to develop a verbal form of the HITS and to compare it to the published written version. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from prior HITS research was conducted. From this, the screening questions were modified for oral presentation so that patients could respond with a yes or no answer. To test the comparability of the two screening formats, 103 adult female patients completed both forms of the HITS during routine office visits. Phase one of this study used Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) on 210 cases from prior HITS research to create a cut score that differentiates clinic patients from self-identified victims of abuse. From this, written HITS questions were modi-fied for verbal administration. Phase two of this study used t test, ANOVA, and classification of two screening formats to compare the written and verbal HITS administered to 103 adult female family medicine patients. RESULTS: Responses to both types of screening were related. The mean score on the written HITS was statistically higher for respondents who reported {"}yes{"} to a Verbal HITS question. This was consistent across all four questions. Also, the mean written HITS score increased linearly as a function of the number of yes answers on the Verbal HITS. The screening classification (positive, negative) from both forms of the HITS was the same for 83{\%} of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The verbal and written HITS comprise two ways that clinicians can screen for domestic violence.",
author = "Amer Shakil and Jacqueline Bardwell and Kevin Sherin and Sinacore, {James M.} and Robert Zitter and Kindratt, {Tiffany B.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of verbal hits for intimate partner violence screening in family medicine

AU - Shakil, Amer

AU - Bardwell, Jacqueline

AU - Sherin, Kevin

AU - Sinacore, James M.

AU - Zitter, Robert

AU - Kindratt, Tiffany B.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Researchers in intimate partner violence (IPV) screening have developed a short written tool called HITS. The acronym corresponds to questions that elicit information about how often a woman's male partner physically Hurts, Insults, Threatens harm, and Screams at her. The purpose of this study was to develop a verbal form of the HITS and to compare it to the published written version. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from prior HITS research was conducted. From this, the screening questions were modified for oral presentation so that patients could respond with a yes or no answer. To test the comparability of the two screening formats, 103 adult female patients completed both forms of the HITS during routine office visits. Phase one of this study used Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) on 210 cases from prior HITS research to create a cut score that differentiates clinic patients from self-identified victims of abuse. From this, written HITS questions were modi-fied for verbal administration. Phase two of this study used t test, ANOVA, and classification of two screening formats to compare the written and verbal HITS administered to 103 adult female family medicine patients. RESULTS: Responses to both types of screening were related. The mean score on the written HITS was statistically higher for respondents who reported "yes" to a Verbal HITS question. This was consistent across all four questions. Also, the mean written HITS score increased linearly as a function of the number of yes answers on the Verbal HITS. The screening classification (positive, negative) from both forms of the HITS was the same for 83% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The verbal and written HITS comprise two ways that clinicians can screen for domestic violence.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Researchers in intimate partner violence (IPV) screening have developed a short written tool called HITS. The acronym corresponds to questions that elicit information about how often a woman's male partner physically Hurts, Insults, Threatens harm, and Screams at her. The purpose of this study was to develop a verbal form of the HITS and to compare it to the published written version. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from prior HITS research was conducted. From this, the screening questions were modified for oral presentation so that patients could respond with a yes or no answer. To test the comparability of the two screening formats, 103 adult female patients completed both forms of the HITS during routine office visits. Phase one of this study used Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) on 210 cases from prior HITS research to create a cut score that differentiates clinic patients from self-identified victims of abuse. From this, written HITS questions were modi-fied for verbal administration. Phase two of this study used t test, ANOVA, and classification of two screening formats to compare the written and verbal HITS administered to 103 adult female family medicine patients. RESULTS: Responses to both types of screening were related. The mean score on the written HITS was statistically higher for respondents who reported "yes" to a Verbal HITS question. This was consistent across all four questions. Also, the mean written HITS score increased linearly as a function of the number of yes answers on the Verbal HITS. The screening classification (positive, negative) from both forms of the HITS was the same for 83% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The verbal and written HITS comprise two ways that clinicians can screen for domestic violence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896343562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896343562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24652635

AN - SCOPUS:84896343562

VL - 46

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 3

ER -