Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in differentiating gallbladder cancer from acute and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis

Ashish P. Wasnik, Mathew S. Davenport, Ravi K. Kaza, William J. Weadock, Aaron Udager, Nahid Keshavarzi, Bin Nan, Katherine E. Maturen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector CT (MDCT) for differentiating gallbladder cancer from acute and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis using previously described imaging features. Methods: In this IRB approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective cohort study, contrast-enhanced MDCT of histologically confirmed acute cholecystitis (n = 17), xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (n = 25), and gallbladder cancer (n = 18) were reviewed independently by three abdominal radiologists blinded to outcome. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for the differentiation of gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis (acute and xanthogranulomatous) using various imaging parameters. Kappa (κ) statistics and two-way mixed-model single-measure intra-class correlation statistics (ICC) were calculated for each imaging feature and the final radiologic diagnosis. Results: Inter-rater agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.43–0.70), sensitivity 0.67–0.78, specificity 0.22–0.33 and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.28–8.56 for the differentiation of gallbladder cancer from benign gallbladder pathology. Only three imaging findings: disrupted gallbladder mucosa (κ = 0.68), intraluminal gallstones (κ = 0.66), and gallbladder wall thickness (ICC = 0.63) had substantial inter-rater agreement. The following had slight or no agreement: intramural hypoattenuating nodules (κ = 0.17), transient hepatic attenuation differences (κ = 0.14), gallbladder wall calcification (κ = −0.01), gallbladder wall enhancement (κ = 0.18), and omental or mesenteric invasion (κ = 0.08). In the final multivariate model, the following were significant predictors useful in making or excluding diagnosis of gallbladder cancer: focal gallbladder wall thickening (p = 0.003, OR: 13.09 [95% CI: 2.40–71.48]), pericholecystic “fat stranding” (p = 0.018, OR: 0.10 [95% CI: 0.01–0.66]), and maximum short axis lymph node diameter (p = 0.043, OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.00–1.38]). Conclusion: MDCT has moderate sensitivity, poor specificity, and moderate-to-substantial inter-rater repeatability for the differentiation of gallbladder cancer from acute and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-228
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume50
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cholecystitis
  • Gallbladder cancer
  • MDCT
  • Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in differentiating gallbladder cancer from acute and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this