Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Javed, M. Jumean, M. H. Murad, D. Okorodudu, S. Kumar, V. K. Somers, O. Sochor, F. Lopez-Jimenez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The ideal means of identifying obesity in children and adolescents has not been determined although body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used screening tool. Objective We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of BMI to detect adiposity in children up to 18 years. Methods Data sources were EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and SCOPUS up to March 2013. Studies providing measures of diagnostic performance of BMI and using body composition technique for body fat percentage measurement were included. Results Thirty-seven eligible studies that evaluated 53 521 patients, with mean age ranging from 4 to 18 years were included in the meta-analysis. Commonly used BMI cut-offs for obesity showed pooled sensitivity to detect high adiposity of 0.73 (confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.79), specificity of 0.93 (CI 0.88-0.96) and diagnostic odds ratio of 36.93 (CI 20.75-65.71). Males had lower sensitivity. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 48%) explained in meta-regression by differences across studies in race, BMI cut-off, BMI reference criteria (Center for Disease Control vs. International Obesity Task Force) and reference standard method assessing adiposity. Conclusion BMI has high specificity but low sensitivity to detect excess adiposity and fails to identify over a quarter of children with excess body fat percentage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-244
Number of pages11
JournalPediatric obesity
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Adiposity
Meta-Analysis
Body Mass Index
Obesity
Pediatric Obesity
Confidence Intervals
Adipose Tissue
Information Storage and Retrieval
Advisory Committees
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Body Composition
MEDLINE
Odds Ratio
Databases
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • meta-analysis
  • paediatric obesity
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Health Policy
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Javed, A.; Jumean, M.; Murad, M. H.; Okorodudu, D.; Kumar, S.; Somers, V. K.; Sochor, O.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.

In: Pediatric obesity, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 234-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Javed, A. ; Jumean, M. ; Murad, M. H. ; Okorodudu, D. ; Kumar, S. ; Somers, V. K. ; Sochor, O. ; Lopez-Jimenez, F. / Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Pediatric obesity. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 234-244.
@article{ecffbf4ae72b4be9a7c3bd17944801e0,
title = "Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background The ideal means of identifying obesity in children and adolescents has not been determined although body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used screening tool. Objective We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of BMI to detect adiposity in children up to 18 years. Methods Data sources were EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and SCOPUS up to March 2013. Studies providing measures of diagnostic performance of BMI and using body composition technique for body fat percentage measurement were included. Results Thirty-seven eligible studies that evaluated 53 521 patients, with mean age ranging from 4 to 18 years were included in the meta-analysis. Commonly used BMI cut-offs for obesity showed pooled sensitivity to detect high adiposity of 0.73 (confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.79), specificity of 0.93 (CI 0.88-0.96) and diagnostic odds ratio of 36.93 (CI 20.75-65.71). Males had lower sensitivity. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 48{\%}) explained in meta-regression by differences across studies in race, BMI cut-off, BMI reference criteria (Center for Disease Control vs. International Obesity Task Force) and reference standard method assessing adiposity. Conclusion BMI has high specificity but low sensitivity to detect excess adiposity and fails to identify over a quarter of children with excess body fat percentage.",
keywords = "Body mass index, meta-analysis, paediatric obesity, systematic review",
author = "A. Javed and M. Jumean and Murad, {M. H.} and D. Okorodudu and S. Kumar and Somers, {V. K.} and O. Sochor and F. Lopez-Jimenez",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijpo.242",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "234--244",
journal = "Pediatric obesity",
issn = "2047-6310",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell for the International Association for the Study of Obesity",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Javed, A.

AU - Jumean, M.

AU - Murad, M. H.

AU - Okorodudu, D.

AU - Kumar, S.

AU - Somers, V. K.

AU - Sochor, O.

AU - Lopez-Jimenez, F.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background The ideal means of identifying obesity in children and adolescents has not been determined although body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used screening tool. Objective We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of BMI to detect adiposity in children up to 18 years. Methods Data sources were EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and SCOPUS up to March 2013. Studies providing measures of diagnostic performance of BMI and using body composition technique for body fat percentage measurement were included. Results Thirty-seven eligible studies that evaluated 53 521 patients, with mean age ranging from 4 to 18 years were included in the meta-analysis. Commonly used BMI cut-offs for obesity showed pooled sensitivity to detect high adiposity of 0.73 (confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.79), specificity of 0.93 (CI 0.88-0.96) and diagnostic odds ratio of 36.93 (CI 20.75-65.71). Males had lower sensitivity. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 48%) explained in meta-regression by differences across studies in race, BMI cut-off, BMI reference criteria (Center for Disease Control vs. International Obesity Task Force) and reference standard method assessing adiposity. Conclusion BMI has high specificity but low sensitivity to detect excess adiposity and fails to identify over a quarter of children with excess body fat percentage.

AB - Background The ideal means of identifying obesity in children and adolescents has not been determined although body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used screening tool. Objective We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of BMI to detect adiposity in children up to 18 years. Methods Data sources were EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and SCOPUS up to March 2013. Studies providing measures of diagnostic performance of BMI and using body composition technique for body fat percentage measurement were included. Results Thirty-seven eligible studies that evaluated 53 521 patients, with mean age ranging from 4 to 18 years were included in the meta-analysis. Commonly used BMI cut-offs for obesity showed pooled sensitivity to detect high adiposity of 0.73 (confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.79), specificity of 0.93 (CI 0.88-0.96) and diagnostic odds ratio of 36.93 (CI 20.75-65.71). Males had lower sensitivity. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 48%) explained in meta-regression by differences across studies in race, BMI cut-off, BMI reference criteria (Center for Disease Control vs. International Obesity Task Force) and reference standard method assessing adiposity. Conclusion BMI has high specificity but low sensitivity to detect excess adiposity and fails to identify over a quarter of children with excess body fat percentage.

KW - Body mass index

KW - meta-analysis

KW - paediatric obesity

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928929466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928929466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijpo.242

DO - 10.1111/ijpo.242

M3 - Article

C2 - 24961794

AN - SCOPUS:84928929466

VL - 10

SP - 234

EP - 244

JO - Pediatric obesity

JF - Pediatric obesity

SN - 2047-6310

IS - 3

ER -