Differences between estimates and measured Pa(CO2) during rest and exercise in older subjects

J. S. Williams, T. G. Babb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Arterial P(CO2) (Pa(CO2)) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (P(J)(CO2)) (J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954-960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating Pa(CO2) from end-tidal P(CO2) (PET(CO2)) or P(JCO2) at rest, ventilatory threshold (V̇Th), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects. PET(CO2) was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated Pa(CO2) values and the actual values of Pa(CO2) were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects, PET(CO2) was not significantly different from Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.2 + 4.3 Torr), v̇Th (0.4 ± 2.5), or Max (-0.8 ± 2.7), and the two were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated at V̇Th (r = 0.84) and Max (r = 0.87) but not at rest (r = 0.47). P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.0 ± 3.9) and V̇th (-1.3 ± 2.3) but significantly lower at Max.(-3.0 ± 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at V̇th (r = 0.86) and Max (r = 0.80) but not at rest (r = 0.54). PET(CO2) was significantly higher than Pa(CO2) during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to Pa(CO2) at rest. P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest and V̇th but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that Pa(CO2) during exercise is better estimated by PET(CO2) than by P(J)(CO2) in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that PET(CO2) does not exceed Pa(CO2) during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However, Pa(CO2) at rest is best estimated by P(J)(CO2) in both younger and older subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-316
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume83
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Gases
Catheters

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Arterial end-tidal carbon dioxide difference
  • Arterial partial carbon dioxide pressure
  • Blood gases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Differences between estimates and measured Pa(CO2) during rest and exercise in older subjects. / Williams, J. S.; Babb, T. G.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 83, No. 1, 07.1997, p. 312-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f14d58ccc534fbbbeae0a43b99083df,
title = "Differences between estimates and measured Pa(CO2) during rest and exercise in older subjects",
abstract = "Arterial P(CO2) (Pa(CO2)) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (P(J)(CO2)) (J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954-960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating Pa(CO2) from end-tidal P(CO2) (PET(CO2)) or P(JCO2) at rest, ventilatory threshold (V̇Th), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects. PET(CO2) was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated Pa(CO2) values and the actual values of Pa(CO2) were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects, PET(CO2) was not significantly different from Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.2 + 4.3 Torr), v̇Th (0.4 ± 2.5), or Max (-0.8 ± 2.7), and the two were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated at V̇Th (r = 0.84) and Max (r = 0.87) but not at rest (r = 0.47). P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.0 ± 3.9) and V̇th (-1.3 ± 2.3) but significantly lower at Max.(-3.0 ± 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at V̇th (r = 0.86) and Max (r = 0.80) but not at rest (r = 0.54). PET(CO2) was significantly higher than Pa(CO2) during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to Pa(CO2) at rest. P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest and V̇th but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that Pa(CO2) during exercise is better estimated by PET(CO2) than by P(J)(CO2) in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that PET(CO2) does not exceed Pa(CO2) during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However, Pa(CO2) at rest is best estimated by P(J)(CO2) in both younger and older subjects.",
keywords = "Aging, Arterial end-tidal carbon dioxide difference, Arterial partial carbon dioxide pressure, Blood gases",
author = "Williams, {J. S.} and Babb, {T. G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "312--316",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "0161-7567",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences between estimates and measured Pa(CO2) during rest and exercise in older subjects

AU - Williams, J. S.

AU - Babb, T. G.

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - Arterial P(CO2) (Pa(CO2)) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (P(J)(CO2)) (J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954-960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating Pa(CO2) from end-tidal P(CO2) (PET(CO2)) or P(JCO2) at rest, ventilatory threshold (V̇Th), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects. PET(CO2) was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated Pa(CO2) values and the actual values of Pa(CO2) were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects, PET(CO2) was not significantly different from Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.2 + 4.3 Torr), v̇Th (0.4 ± 2.5), or Max (-0.8 ± 2.7), and the two were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated at V̇Th (r = 0.84) and Max (r = 0.87) but not at rest (r = 0.47). P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.0 ± 3.9) and V̇th (-1.3 ± 2.3) but significantly lower at Max.(-3.0 ± 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at V̇th (r = 0.86) and Max (r = 0.80) but not at rest (r = 0.54). PET(CO2) was significantly higher than Pa(CO2) during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to Pa(CO2) at rest. P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest and V̇th but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that Pa(CO2) during exercise is better estimated by PET(CO2) than by P(J)(CO2) in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that PET(CO2) does not exceed Pa(CO2) during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However, Pa(CO2) at rest is best estimated by P(J)(CO2) in both younger and older subjects.

AB - Arterial P(CO2) (Pa(CO2)) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (P(J)(CO2)) (J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954-960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating Pa(CO2) from end-tidal P(CO2) (PET(CO2)) or P(JCO2) at rest, ventilatory threshold (V̇Th), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects. PET(CO2) was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated Pa(CO2) values and the actual values of Pa(CO2) were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects, PET(CO2) was not significantly different from Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.2 + 4.3 Torr), v̇Th (0.4 ± 2.5), or Max (-0.8 ± 2.7), and the two were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated at V̇Th (r = 0.84) and Max (r = 0.87) but not at rest (r = 0.47). P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest (- 1.0 ± 3.9) and V̇th (-1.3 ± 2.3) but significantly lower at Max.(-3.0 ± 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at V̇th (r = 0.86) and Max (r = 0.80) but not at rest (r = 0.54). PET(CO2) was significantly higher than Pa(CO2) during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to Pa(CO2) at rest. P(J)(CO2) was similar to Pa(CO2) at rest and V̇th but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that Pa(CO2) during exercise is better estimated by PET(CO2) than by P(J)(CO2) in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that PET(CO2) does not exceed Pa(CO2) during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However, Pa(CO2) at rest is best estimated by P(J)(CO2) in both younger and older subjects.

KW - Aging

KW - Arterial end-tidal carbon dioxide difference

KW - Arterial partial carbon dioxide pressure

KW - Blood gases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030795907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030795907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9216977

AN - SCOPUS:0030795907

VL - 83

SP - 312

EP - 316

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 0161-7567

IS - 1

ER -