Different methods for reproducing time, different results

Giovanna Mioni, Franca Stablum, Shawn M. McClintock, Simon Grondin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the most widely used tasks for investigating psychological time, time reproduction, requires from participants the reproduction of the duration of a previously presented stimulus. Although prior studies have investigated the effects of different cognitive processes on time reproduction performance, no studies have looked into the effects of different reproduction methods on these performances. In the present study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three reproduction methods, which included (a) just pressing at the end of the interval, (b) pressing to start and stop the interval, and (c) maintaining continuous pressing during the interval. The study revealed that the three reproduction methods were not equivalent, with the method involving keypresses to start and stop the reproduction showing the highest accuracy, and the method of continuous press generating less variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-681
Number of pages7
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Reproduction
time
performance
stimulus
Psychology

Keywords

  • Method comparison
  • Motor responses
  • Time perception
  • Time reproduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Different methods for reproducing time, different results. / Mioni, Giovanna; Stablum, Franca; McClintock, Shawn M.; Grondin, Simon.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 675-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mioni, Giovanna ; Stablum, Franca ; McClintock, Shawn M. ; Grondin, Simon. / Different methods for reproducing time, different results. In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 675-681.
@article{d9a64770b817482789e628744dec8547,
title = "Different methods for reproducing time, different results",
abstract = "One of the most widely used tasks for investigating psychological time, time reproduction, requires from participants the reproduction of the duration of a previously presented stimulus. Although prior studies have investigated the effects of different cognitive processes on time reproduction performance, no studies have looked into the effects of different reproduction methods on these performances. In the present study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three reproduction methods, which included (a) just pressing at the end of the interval, (b) pressing to start and stop the interval, and (c) maintaining continuous pressing during the interval. The study revealed that the three reproduction methods were not equivalent, with the method involving keypresses to start and stop the reproduction showing the highest accuracy, and the method of continuous press generating less variability.",
keywords = "Method comparison, Motor responses, Time perception, Time reproduction",
author = "Giovanna Mioni and Franca Stablum and McClintock, {Shawn M.} and Simon Grondin",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-014-0625-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "675--681",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different methods for reproducing time, different results

AU - Mioni, Giovanna

AU - Stablum, Franca

AU - McClintock, Shawn M.

AU - Grondin, Simon

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - One of the most widely used tasks for investigating psychological time, time reproduction, requires from participants the reproduction of the duration of a previously presented stimulus. Although prior studies have investigated the effects of different cognitive processes on time reproduction performance, no studies have looked into the effects of different reproduction methods on these performances. In the present study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three reproduction methods, which included (a) just pressing at the end of the interval, (b) pressing to start and stop the interval, and (c) maintaining continuous pressing during the interval. The study revealed that the three reproduction methods were not equivalent, with the method involving keypresses to start and stop the reproduction showing the highest accuracy, and the method of continuous press generating less variability.

AB - One of the most widely used tasks for investigating psychological time, time reproduction, requires from participants the reproduction of the duration of a previously presented stimulus. Although prior studies have investigated the effects of different cognitive processes on time reproduction performance, no studies have looked into the effects of different reproduction methods on these performances. In the present study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three reproduction methods, which included (a) just pressing at the end of the interval, (b) pressing to start and stop the interval, and (c) maintaining continuous pressing during the interval. The study revealed that the three reproduction methods were not equivalent, with the method involving keypresses to start and stop the reproduction showing the highest accuracy, and the method of continuous press generating less variability.

KW - Method comparison

KW - Motor responses

KW - Time perception

KW - Time reproduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899455161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899455161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0625-3

DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0625-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24470257

AN - SCOPUS:84899455161

VL - 76

SP - 675

EP - 681

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 3

ER -