Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States: Have we made any progress?

Tiberiu Ezri, Peter Szmuk, R. David Warters, Jeffrey Katz, Carin A. Hagberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To determine the extent instruction and practice in the use of airway devices and techniques varies among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States. Design: Survey questionnaire. Setting: University medical center. Measurements: Questionnaires were completed by American-trained anesthesiologists who attended the 1999 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting. Data collected included demographics, education, skills with airway devices/techniques, management of clinical difficult airway scenarios, and the use of the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm. Main Results: 1) Demographics: 452 questionnaires were correctly completed; 62% attending anesthesiologists, 70% <50 years, 81% males, 44% from academic institutions, 63% >10 years of practice, 81% night duty, 77% board certified. 2) Education: 71% had at least one educational modality: difficult airway rotation, workshops, conferences, books, and simulators. 3) Skills: Miller blade 61%, Bullard laryngoscope 32%, LMA™ 86%, Combitube™ 43%, bougie 43%, exchangers 47%, cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) 34%, retrograde 41%, transtracheal needle jet ventilation 34%, cricothyrotomy 21%, fiberoptics 59%, and blind nasal intubation 78%. The average reported use of special airway devices/techniques was 47.5%. 4) Management choices: failed intubation/ ventilation: LMA™ (81%) and for all other situations: fiberoptic intubation. Use of ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm in clinical practice (86%). Conclusion: Fiberoptic intubation and the LMA™ are most popular in management of the difficult airway.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-422
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

Airway Management
Intubation
Education
Equipment and Supplies
Ventilation
Demography
Laryngoscopes
Nose
Needles
Anesthesiologists
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Airway management
  • Anesthesiologists
  • Equipment and supplies: airway devices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States : Have we made any progress? / Ezri, Tiberiu; Szmuk, Peter; Warters, R. David; Katz, Jeffrey; Hagberg, Carin A.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 15, No. 6, 09.2003, p. 418-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{66bd6ff6d81d48a9a428de0c079f6f99,
title = "Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States: Have we made any progress?",
abstract = "Study Objective: To determine the extent instruction and practice in the use of airway devices and techniques varies among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States. Design: Survey questionnaire. Setting: University medical center. Measurements: Questionnaires were completed by American-trained anesthesiologists who attended the 1999 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting. Data collected included demographics, education, skills with airway devices/techniques, management of clinical difficult airway scenarios, and the use of the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm. Main Results: 1) Demographics: 452 questionnaires were correctly completed; 62{\%} attending anesthesiologists, 70{\%} <50 years, 81{\%} males, 44{\%} from academic institutions, 63{\%} >10 years of practice, 81{\%} night duty, 77{\%} board certified. 2) Education: 71{\%} had at least one educational modality: difficult airway rotation, workshops, conferences, books, and simulators. 3) Skills: Miller blade 61{\%}, Bullard laryngoscope 32{\%}, LMA™ 86{\%}, Combitube™ 43{\%}, bougie 43{\%}, exchangers 47{\%}, cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) 34{\%}, retrograde 41{\%}, transtracheal needle jet ventilation 34{\%}, cricothyrotomy 21{\%}, fiberoptics 59{\%}, and blind nasal intubation 78{\%}. The average reported use of special airway devices/techniques was 47.5{\%}. 4) Management choices: failed intubation/ ventilation: LMA™ (81{\%}) and for all other situations: fiberoptic intubation. Use of ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm in clinical practice (86{\%}). Conclusion: Fiberoptic intubation and the LMA™ are most popular in management of the difficult airway.",
keywords = "Airway management, Anesthesiologists, Equipment and supplies: airway devices",
author = "Tiberiu Ezri and Peter Szmuk and Warters, {R. David} and Jeffrey Katz and Hagberg, {Carin A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0952-8180(03)00080-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "418--422",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States

T2 - Have we made any progress?

AU - Ezri, Tiberiu

AU - Szmuk, Peter

AU - Warters, R. David

AU - Katz, Jeffrey

AU - Hagberg, Carin A.

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - Study Objective: To determine the extent instruction and practice in the use of airway devices and techniques varies among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States. Design: Survey questionnaire. Setting: University medical center. Measurements: Questionnaires were completed by American-trained anesthesiologists who attended the 1999 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting. Data collected included demographics, education, skills with airway devices/techniques, management of clinical difficult airway scenarios, and the use of the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm. Main Results: 1) Demographics: 452 questionnaires were correctly completed; 62% attending anesthesiologists, 70% <50 years, 81% males, 44% from academic institutions, 63% >10 years of practice, 81% night duty, 77% board certified. 2) Education: 71% had at least one educational modality: difficult airway rotation, workshops, conferences, books, and simulators. 3) Skills: Miller blade 61%, Bullard laryngoscope 32%, LMA™ 86%, Combitube™ 43%, bougie 43%, exchangers 47%, cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) 34%, retrograde 41%, transtracheal needle jet ventilation 34%, cricothyrotomy 21%, fiberoptics 59%, and blind nasal intubation 78%. The average reported use of special airway devices/techniques was 47.5%. 4) Management choices: failed intubation/ ventilation: LMA™ (81%) and for all other situations: fiberoptic intubation. Use of ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm in clinical practice (86%). Conclusion: Fiberoptic intubation and the LMA™ are most popular in management of the difficult airway.

AB - Study Objective: To determine the extent instruction and practice in the use of airway devices and techniques varies among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States. Design: Survey questionnaire. Setting: University medical center. Measurements: Questionnaires were completed by American-trained anesthesiologists who attended the 1999 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting. Data collected included demographics, education, skills with airway devices/techniques, management of clinical difficult airway scenarios, and the use of the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm. Main Results: 1) Demographics: 452 questionnaires were correctly completed; 62% attending anesthesiologists, 70% <50 years, 81% males, 44% from academic institutions, 63% >10 years of practice, 81% night duty, 77% board certified. 2) Education: 71% had at least one educational modality: difficult airway rotation, workshops, conferences, books, and simulators. 3) Skills: Miller blade 61%, Bullard laryngoscope 32%, LMA™ 86%, Combitube™ 43%, bougie 43%, exchangers 47%, cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) 34%, retrograde 41%, transtracheal needle jet ventilation 34%, cricothyrotomy 21%, fiberoptics 59%, and blind nasal intubation 78%. The average reported use of special airway devices/techniques was 47.5%. 4) Management choices: failed intubation/ ventilation: LMA™ (81%) and for all other situations: fiberoptic intubation. Use of ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm in clinical practice (86%). Conclusion: Fiberoptic intubation and the LMA™ are most popular in management of the difficult airway.

KW - Airway management

KW - Anesthesiologists

KW - Equipment and supplies: airway devices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344063401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344063401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0952-8180(03)00080-1

DO - 10.1016/S0952-8180(03)00080-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 14652117

AN - SCOPUS:0344063401

VL - 15

SP - 418

EP - 422

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 6

ER -