Digital tomosynthesis for respiratory gated liver treatment: Clinical feasibility for daily image guidance

Q. Jackie Wu, Jeffrey Meyer, Jessica Fuller, Devon Godfrey, Zhiheng Wang, Junan Zhang, Fang Fang Yin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Breath-hold (BH) treatment minimizes internal target volumes (ITV) when treating sites prone to motion. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) imaging has advantages over cone-beam CT (CBCT) for BH imaging: BH-DTS scan can be completed during a single breath-hold, whereas BH-CBCT is usually acquired by parsing the gantry rotation into multiple BH segments. This study evaluates the localization accuracy of DTS for BH treatment of liver tumors. Methods: Both planning CT and on-board DTS/CBCT images were acquired under BH, using the planning CT BH window as reference. Onboard imaging data sets included two independent DTS orientations (coronal and sagittal), and CBCT images. Soft tissue target positioning was measured by each imaging modality and translated into couch shifts. Performance of the two DTS orientations was evaluated by comparing target positioning with the CBCT benchmark, determined by two observers. Results: Image data sets were collected from thirty-eight treatment fractions (14 patients). Mean differences between the two DTS methods and the CBCT method were <1 mm in all directions (except the lateral direction with sagittal-DTS: 1.2 mm); the standard deviation was in the range of 2.1-3.5 mm for all techniques. The Pearson correlation showed good interobserver agreement for the coronal-DTS (0.72-0.78). The interobserver agreement for the sagittal-DTS was good for the in-plane directions (0.70-0.82), but poor in the out-of-plane direction (lateral, 0.26). Conclusions: BH-DTS may be a simpler alternative to BH-CBCT for onboard soft tissue localization of the liver, although the precision of DTS localization appears to be somewhat lower because of the presence of subtle out-of-plane blur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-296
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
liver
cones
Liver
Therapeutics
positioning
planning
Benchmarking
couches
gantry cranes
standard deviation
tumors
Direction compound
shift
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breath hold
  • Digital tomosynthesis
  • Image guidance
  • liver
  • Respiratory motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Digital tomosynthesis for respiratory gated liver treatment : Clinical feasibility for daily image guidance. / Wu, Q. Jackie; Meyer, Jeffrey; Fuller, Jessica; Godfrey, Devon; Wang, Zhiheng; Zhang, Junan; Yin, Fang Fang.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 289-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Q. Jackie ; Meyer, Jeffrey ; Fuller, Jessica ; Godfrey, Devon ; Wang, Zhiheng ; Zhang, Junan ; Yin, Fang Fang. / Digital tomosynthesis for respiratory gated liver treatment : Clinical feasibility for daily image guidance. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 79, No. 1. pp. 289-296.
@article{baadeb4dfe384db2a93e2a4e28daa6f8,
title = "Digital tomosynthesis for respiratory gated liver treatment: Clinical feasibility for daily image guidance",
abstract = "Purpose: Breath-hold (BH) treatment minimizes internal target volumes (ITV) when treating sites prone to motion. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) imaging has advantages over cone-beam CT (CBCT) for BH imaging: BH-DTS scan can be completed during a single breath-hold, whereas BH-CBCT is usually acquired by parsing the gantry rotation into multiple BH segments. This study evaluates the localization accuracy of DTS for BH treatment of liver tumors. Methods: Both planning CT and on-board DTS/CBCT images were acquired under BH, using the planning CT BH window as reference. Onboard imaging data sets included two independent DTS orientations (coronal and sagittal), and CBCT images. Soft tissue target positioning was measured by each imaging modality and translated into couch shifts. Performance of the two DTS orientations was evaluated by comparing target positioning with the CBCT benchmark, determined by two observers. Results: Image data sets were collected from thirty-eight treatment fractions (14 patients). Mean differences between the two DTS methods and the CBCT method were <1 mm in all directions (except the lateral direction with sagittal-DTS: 1.2 mm); the standard deviation was in the range of 2.1-3.5 mm for all techniques. The Pearson correlation showed good interobserver agreement for the coronal-DTS (0.72-0.78). The interobserver agreement for the sagittal-DTS was good for the in-plane directions (0.70-0.82), but poor in the out-of-plane direction (lateral, 0.26). Conclusions: BH-DTS may be a simpler alternative to BH-CBCT for onboard soft tissue localization of the liver, although the precision of DTS localization appears to be somewhat lower because of the presence of subtle out-of-plane blur.",
keywords = "Breath hold, Digital tomosynthesis, Image guidance, liver, Respiratory motion",
author = "Wu, {Q. Jackie} and Jeffrey Meyer and Jessica Fuller and Devon Godfrey and Zhiheng Wang and Junan Zhang and Yin, {Fang Fang}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "289--296",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital tomosynthesis for respiratory gated liver treatment

T2 - Clinical feasibility for daily image guidance

AU - Wu, Q. Jackie

AU - Meyer, Jeffrey

AU - Fuller, Jessica

AU - Godfrey, Devon

AU - Wang, Zhiheng

AU - Zhang, Junan

AU - Yin, Fang Fang

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Breath-hold (BH) treatment minimizes internal target volumes (ITV) when treating sites prone to motion. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) imaging has advantages over cone-beam CT (CBCT) for BH imaging: BH-DTS scan can be completed during a single breath-hold, whereas BH-CBCT is usually acquired by parsing the gantry rotation into multiple BH segments. This study evaluates the localization accuracy of DTS for BH treatment of liver tumors. Methods: Both planning CT and on-board DTS/CBCT images were acquired under BH, using the planning CT BH window as reference. Onboard imaging data sets included two independent DTS orientations (coronal and sagittal), and CBCT images. Soft tissue target positioning was measured by each imaging modality and translated into couch shifts. Performance of the two DTS orientations was evaluated by comparing target positioning with the CBCT benchmark, determined by two observers. Results: Image data sets were collected from thirty-eight treatment fractions (14 patients). Mean differences between the two DTS methods and the CBCT method were <1 mm in all directions (except the lateral direction with sagittal-DTS: 1.2 mm); the standard deviation was in the range of 2.1-3.5 mm for all techniques. The Pearson correlation showed good interobserver agreement for the coronal-DTS (0.72-0.78). The interobserver agreement for the sagittal-DTS was good for the in-plane directions (0.70-0.82), but poor in the out-of-plane direction (lateral, 0.26). Conclusions: BH-DTS may be a simpler alternative to BH-CBCT for onboard soft tissue localization of the liver, although the precision of DTS localization appears to be somewhat lower because of the presence of subtle out-of-plane blur.

AB - Purpose: Breath-hold (BH) treatment minimizes internal target volumes (ITV) when treating sites prone to motion. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) imaging has advantages over cone-beam CT (CBCT) for BH imaging: BH-DTS scan can be completed during a single breath-hold, whereas BH-CBCT is usually acquired by parsing the gantry rotation into multiple BH segments. This study evaluates the localization accuracy of DTS for BH treatment of liver tumors. Methods: Both planning CT and on-board DTS/CBCT images were acquired under BH, using the planning CT BH window as reference. Onboard imaging data sets included two independent DTS orientations (coronal and sagittal), and CBCT images. Soft tissue target positioning was measured by each imaging modality and translated into couch shifts. Performance of the two DTS orientations was evaluated by comparing target positioning with the CBCT benchmark, determined by two observers. Results: Image data sets were collected from thirty-eight treatment fractions (14 patients). Mean differences between the two DTS methods and the CBCT method were <1 mm in all directions (except the lateral direction with sagittal-DTS: 1.2 mm); the standard deviation was in the range of 2.1-3.5 mm for all techniques. The Pearson correlation showed good interobserver agreement for the coronal-DTS (0.72-0.78). The interobserver agreement for the sagittal-DTS was good for the in-plane directions (0.70-0.82), but poor in the out-of-plane direction (lateral, 0.26). Conclusions: BH-DTS may be a simpler alternative to BH-CBCT for onboard soft tissue localization of the liver, although the precision of DTS localization appears to be somewhat lower because of the presence of subtle out-of-plane blur.

KW - Breath hold

KW - Digital tomosynthesis

KW - Image guidance

KW - liver

KW - Respiratory motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650011780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650011780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.047

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 20646848

AN - SCOPUS:78650011780

VL - 79

SP - 289

EP - 296

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -