Discipline of psychologists held in violation for sexual misconduct

M. C. Gottlieb, B. R. Hampton, J. M. Sell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

State licensing boards have had no guidelines from the profession to inform their decision-making regarding sanctions for psychologists held in violation for sexual misconduct. The absence of guidelines has resulted in a patch work of case-by-case decision-making in which offenders are sanctioned inconsistently. The authors assumed that the absence of guidelines was based upon disagreement within the profession about how offenders should be sanctioned. We conducted a national survey of practicing psychologists that found a consensus regarding how severely state licensing boards should sanction offenders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)559-567
Number of pages9
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discipline of psychologists held in violation for sexual misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this