Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit

which one do you trust?

Matthew J. Martin, Elizabeth FitzSullivan, Ali Salim, Carlos V R Brown, Demetrios Demetriades, William Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Both lactate and base deficit (BD) are used as predictors of injury severity and mortality. We examined the significance of these measures when used in combination, and particularly when they provide conflicting data. Methods: We reviewed all intensive care unit patients with simultaneously obtained lactate and BD measurements. The ability to predict mortality and hospital stay was compared alone, in combination, and when there was disagreement between the measures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare predictive abilities. Results: There were 1,298 patients with 12,197 sets of paired laboratory data; 1,026 trauma patients and 272 surgical patients. Lactic acidosis was present in 41% and a significant BD level (>2) was found in 52%. Nonsurvivors had higher admission lactate (6.2 vs. 3.3) and base deficit (6.1 vs. 3.2) levels than survivors (both P < .01), with a modest correlation (r = .52) between the measures. The admission lactate and BD levels had similar predictive ability for mortality, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .7 and .66, respectively (both P < .01). However, the predictive ability of the BD level decreased significantly during the intensive care unit stay (area, .5) compared with lactate level (area, .68). Lactate and BD levels disagreed in 44% of all laboratory sets. In patients with a normal lactate level (<2.2), the BD level had no predictive ability for mortality (area, .48; P = .26). However, in patients with a normal BD level (<2.0), the lactate level retained its predictive ability for mortality (area, .67; P < .01). Lengths of stay were longer among patients with an increased lactate level, even when the BD level was normal. There was no improvement in predictive ability using a combination of the 2 measures. Conclusions: Both lactate and BD levels may be used to identify lactic acidosis and predict mortality at admission. Increased lactate levels predict mortality and a prolonged course regardless of the associated BD level, whereas an increased BD level has no predictive value if the lactate level is normal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-630
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume191
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Lactic Acid
Aptitude
Mortality
Lactic Acidosis
ROC Curve
Length of Stay
Wounds and Injuries
Survivors

Keywords

  • Base deficit
  • Intensive care
  • Lactate
  • Metabolic acidosis
  • Resuscitation
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit : which one do you trust? / Martin, Matthew J.; FitzSullivan, Elizabeth; Salim, Ali; Brown, Carlos V R; Demetriades, Demetrios; Long, William.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 191, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 625-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, MJ, FitzSullivan, E, Salim, A, Brown, CVR, Demetriades, D & Long, W 2006, 'Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit: which one do you trust?', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 191, no. 5, pp. 625-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.014
Martin, Matthew J. ; FitzSullivan, Elizabeth ; Salim, Ali ; Brown, Carlos V R ; Demetriades, Demetrios ; Long, William. / Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit : which one do you trust?. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 191, No. 5. pp. 625-630.
@article{5ac5489ccff541e2b797725d687a968b,
title = "Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit: which one do you trust?",
abstract = "Purpose: Both lactate and base deficit (BD) are used as predictors of injury severity and mortality. We examined the significance of these measures when used in combination, and particularly when they provide conflicting data. Methods: We reviewed all intensive care unit patients with simultaneously obtained lactate and BD measurements. The ability to predict mortality and hospital stay was compared alone, in combination, and when there was disagreement between the measures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare predictive abilities. Results: There were 1,298 patients with 12,197 sets of paired laboratory data; 1,026 trauma patients and 272 surgical patients. Lactic acidosis was present in 41{\%} and a significant BD level (>2) was found in 52{\%}. Nonsurvivors had higher admission lactate (6.2 vs. 3.3) and base deficit (6.1 vs. 3.2) levels than survivors (both P < .01), with a modest correlation (r = .52) between the measures. The admission lactate and BD levels had similar predictive ability for mortality, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .7 and .66, respectively (both P < .01). However, the predictive ability of the BD level decreased significantly during the intensive care unit stay (area, .5) compared with lactate level (area, .68). Lactate and BD levels disagreed in 44{\%} of all laboratory sets. In patients with a normal lactate level (<2.2), the BD level had no predictive ability for mortality (area, .48; P = .26). However, in patients with a normal BD level (<2.0), the lactate level retained its predictive ability for mortality (area, .67; P < .01). Lengths of stay were longer among patients with an increased lactate level, even when the BD level was normal. There was no improvement in predictive ability using a combination of the 2 measures. Conclusions: Both lactate and BD levels may be used to identify lactic acidosis and predict mortality at admission. Increased lactate levels predict mortality and a prolonged course regardless of the associated BD level, whereas an increased BD level has no predictive value if the lactate level is normal.",
keywords = "Base deficit, Intensive care, Lactate, Metabolic acidosis, Resuscitation, Trauma",
author = "Martin, {Matthew J.} and Elizabeth FitzSullivan and Ali Salim and Brown, {Carlos V R} and Demetrios Demetriades and William Long",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "625--630",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit

T2 - which one do you trust?

AU - Martin, Matthew J.

AU - FitzSullivan, Elizabeth

AU - Salim, Ali

AU - Brown, Carlos V R

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Long, William

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Purpose: Both lactate and base deficit (BD) are used as predictors of injury severity and mortality. We examined the significance of these measures when used in combination, and particularly when they provide conflicting data. Methods: We reviewed all intensive care unit patients with simultaneously obtained lactate and BD measurements. The ability to predict mortality and hospital stay was compared alone, in combination, and when there was disagreement between the measures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare predictive abilities. Results: There were 1,298 patients with 12,197 sets of paired laboratory data; 1,026 trauma patients and 272 surgical patients. Lactic acidosis was present in 41% and a significant BD level (>2) was found in 52%. Nonsurvivors had higher admission lactate (6.2 vs. 3.3) and base deficit (6.1 vs. 3.2) levels than survivors (both P < .01), with a modest correlation (r = .52) between the measures. The admission lactate and BD levels had similar predictive ability for mortality, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .7 and .66, respectively (both P < .01). However, the predictive ability of the BD level decreased significantly during the intensive care unit stay (area, .5) compared with lactate level (area, .68). Lactate and BD levels disagreed in 44% of all laboratory sets. In patients with a normal lactate level (<2.2), the BD level had no predictive ability for mortality (area, .48; P = .26). However, in patients with a normal BD level (<2.0), the lactate level retained its predictive ability for mortality (area, .67; P < .01). Lengths of stay were longer among patients with an increased lactate level, even when the BD level was normal. There was no improvement in predictive ability using a combination of the 2 measures. Conclusions: Both lactate and BD levels may be used to identify lactic acidosis and predict mortality at admission. Increased lactate levels predict mortality and a prolonged course regardless of the associated BD level, whereas an increased BD level has no predictive value if the lactate level is normal.

AB - Purpose: Both lactate and base deficit (BD) are used as predictors of injury severity and mortality. We examined the significance of these measures when used in combination, and particularly when they provide conflicting data. Methods: We reviewed all intensive care unit patients with simultaneously obtained lactate and BD measurements. The ability to predict mortality and hospital stay was compared alone, in combination, and when there was disagreement between the measures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare predictive abilities. Results: There were 1,298 patients with 12,197 sets of paired laboratory data; 1,026 trauma patients and 272 surgical patients. Lactic acidosis was present in 41% and a significant BD level (>2) was found in 52%. Nonsurvivors had higher admission lactate (6.2 vs. 3.3) and base deficit (6.1 vs. 3.2) levels than survivors (both P < .01), with a modest correlation (r = .52) between the measures. The admission lactate and BD levels had similar predictive ability for mortality, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .7 and .66, respectively (both P < .01). However, the predictive ability of the BD level decreased significantly during the intensive care unit stay (area, .5) compared with lactate level (area, .68). Lactate and BD levels disagreed in 44% of all laboratory sets. In patients with a normal lactate level (<2.2), the BD level had no predictive ability for mortality (area, .48; P = .26). However, in patients with a normal BD level (<2.0), the lactate level retained its predictive ability for mortality (area, .67; P < .01). Lengths of stay were longer among patients with an increased lactate level, even when the BD level was normal. There was no improvement in predictive ability using a combination of the 2 measures. Conclusions: Both lactate and BD levels may be used to identify lactic acidosis and predict mortality at admission. Increased lactate levels predict mortality and a prolonged course regardless of the associated BD level, whereas an increased BD level has no predictive value if the lactate level is normal.

KW - Base deficit

KW - Intensive care

KW - Lactate

KW - Metabolic acidosis

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646119662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646119662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.014

M3 - Article

VL - 191

SP - 625

EP - 630

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -