Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study

Mary Kate Law, R. Michael Furr, Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold, Malek Mneimne, Caroline Jaquett, William Fleeson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing suicidality is common in mental health practice and is fundamental to suicide research. Although necessary, there is significant concern that such assessments have unintended harmful consequences. Using a longitudinal randomized control design, the authors evaluated whether repeated and frequent assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors negatively affected individuals, including those at-risk for suicide-related outcomes. Adults (N = 282), including many diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), were recruited through psychiatric outpatient clinics and from the community at large, and were randomly assigned to assessment groups. A control assessment group responded to questions regarding negative psychological experiences several times each day during a 2-week main observation phase. During the same observation period, an intensive suicide assessment group responded to the same questions, along with questions regarding suicidal behavior and ideation. Negative psychological outcomes were measured during the main observation phase (for BPD symptoms unrelated to suicide and for BPD-relevant emotions) and/or at the end of each week during the main observation phase and monthly for 6 months thereafter (for all outcomes, including suicidal ideation and behavior). Results revealed little evidence that intensive suicide assessment triggered negative outcomes, including suicidal ideation or behavior, even among people with BPD. A handful of effects did reach or approach significance, though these were temporary and nonrobust. However, given the seriousness of some outcomes, the authors recommend that researchers or clinicians who implement experience sampling methods including suicide-related items carefully consider the benefits of asking about suicide and to inform participants about possible risks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1171-1181
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Suicide
Borderline Personality Disorder
Suicidal Ideation
Observation
Psychology
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Psychiatry
Mental Health
Emotions
Research Personnel
Control Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Experience sampling
  • Iatrogenic effects
  • Suicidality
  • Suicide assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study. / Law, Mary Kate; Furr, R. Michael; Arnold, Elizabeth Mayfield; Mneimne, Malek; Jaquett, Caroline; Fleeson, William.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 1171-1181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Law, Mary Kate ; Furr, R. Michael ; Arnold, Elizabeth Mayfield ; Mneimne, Malek ; Jaquett, Caroline ; Fleeson, William. / Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study. In: Psychological Assessment. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 1171-1181.
@article{90a54c682e3c4d3c882ffa140f55fe0d,
title = "Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study",
abstract = "Assessing suicidality is common in mental health practice and is fundamental to suicide research. Although necessary, there is significant concern that such assessments have unintended harmful consequences. Using a longitudinal randomized control design, the authors evaluated whether repeated and frequent assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors negatively affected individuals, including those at-risk for suicide-related outcomes. Adults (N = 282), including many diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), were recruited through psychiatric outpatient clinics and from the community at large, and were randomly assigned to assessment groups. A control assessment group responded to questions regarding negative psychological experiences several times each day during a 2-week main observation phase. During the same observation period, an intensive suicide assessment group responded to the same questions, along with questions regarding suicidal behavior and ideation. Negative psychological outcomes were measured during the main observation phase (for BPD symptoms unrelated to suicide and for BPD-relevant emotions) and/or at the end of each week during the main observation phase and monthly for 6 months thereafter (for all outcomes, including suicidal ideation and behavior). Results revealed little evidence that intensive suicide assessment triggered negative outcomes, including suicidal ideation or behavior, even among people with BPD. A handful of effects did reach or approach significance, though these were temporary and nonrobust. However, given the seriousness of some outcomes, the authors recommend that researchers or clinicians who implement experience sampling methods including suicide-related items carefully consider the benefits of asking about suicide and to inform participants about possible risks.",
keywords = "Experience sampling, Iatrogenic effects, Suicidality, Suicide assessment",
author = "Law, {Mary Kate} and Furr, {R. Michael} and Arnold, {Elizabeth Mayfield} and Malek Mneimne and Caroline Jaquett and William Fleeson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pas0000118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1171--1181",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study

AU - Law, Mary Kate

AU - Furr, R. Michael

AU - Arnold, Elizabeth Mayfield

AU - Mneimne, Malek

AU - Jaquett, Caroline

AU - Fleeson, William

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Assessing suicidality is common in mental health practice and is fundamental to suicide research. Although necessary, there is significant concern that such assessments have unintended harmful consequences. Using a longitudinal randomized control design, the authors evaluated whether repeated and frequent assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors negatively affected individuals, including those at-risk for suicide-related outcomes. Adults (N = 282), including many diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), were recruited through psychiatric outpatient clinics and from the community at large, and were randomly assigned to assessment groups. A control assessment group responded to questions regarding negative psychological experiences several times each day during a 2-week main observation phase. During the same observation period, an intensive suicide assessment group responded to the same questions, along with questions regarding suicidal behavior and ideation. Negative psychological outcomes were measured during the main observation phase (for BPD symptoms unrelated to suicide and for BPD-relevant emotions) and/or at the end of each week during the main observation phase and monthly for 6 months thereafter (for all outcomes, including suicidal ideation and behavior). Results revealed little evidence that intensive suicide assessment triggered negative outcomes, including suicidal ideation or behavior, even among people with BPD. A handful of effects did reach or approach significance, though these were temporary and nonrobust. However, given the seriousness of some outcomes, the authors recommend that researchers or clinicians who implement experience sampling methods including suicide-related items carefully consider the benefits of asking about suicide and to inform participants about possible risks.

AB - Assessing suicidality is common in mental health practice and is fundamental to suicide research. Although necessary, there is significant concern that such assessments have unintended harmful consequences. Using a longitudinal randomized control design, the authors evaluated whether repeated and frequent assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors negatively affected individuals, including those at-risk for suicide-related outcomes. Adults (N = 282), including many diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), were recruited through psychiatric outpatient clinics and from the community at large, and were randomly assigned to assessment groups. A control assessment group responded to questions regarding negative psychological experiences several times each day during a 2-week main observation phase. During the same observation period, an intensive suicide assessment group responded to the same questions, along with questions regarding suicidal behavior and ideation. Negative psychological outcomes were measured during the main observation phase (for BPD symptoms unrelated to suicide and for BPD-relevant emotions) and/or at the end of each week during the main observation phase and monthly for 6 months thereafter (for all outcomes, including suicidal ideation and behavior). Results revealed little evidence that intensive suicide assessment triggered negative outcomes, including suicidal ideation or behavior, even among people with BPD. A handful of effects did reach or approach significance, though these were temporary and nonrobust. However, given the seriousness of some outcomes, the authors recommend that researchers or clinicians who implement experience sampling methods including suicide-related items carefully consider the benefits of asking about suicide and to inform participants about possible risks.

KW - Experience sampling

KW - Iatrogenic effects

KW - Suicidality

KW - Suicide assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927920727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927920727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pas0000118

DO - 10.1037/pas0000118

M3 - Article

C2 - 25894705

AN - SCOPUS:84927920727

VL - 27

SP - 1171

EP - 1181

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 4

ER -