Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing?

Lawrence A. Lavery, Easton C. Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the study design, rational and results of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Therapy (CDOT) to heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study was a double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical study to evaluate DFUs over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed and the secondary outcome that was reported was the time to ulcer healing. In the per protocol analysis and in the intent to treat analysis, a higher proportion of DFUs healed in the CDOT group (per protocol 46% vs 22%, P =.02, intent to treat 31.5% vs 15.1%, P =.03). CDOT patients healed ulcers faster compared to the in the sham treatment arm (P =.026)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)892-893
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of diabetes science and technology
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Ulcer
Oxygen
Placebos
Group Psychotherapy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • diabetes
  • healing
  • topical oxygen
  • ulceration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Bioengineering
  • Medicine(all)
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing? / Lavery, Lawrence A.; Ryan, Easton C.

In: Journal of diabetes science and technology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 892-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f19a7fe3afd845d2975eeae46405a0a9,
title = "Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing?",
abstract = "The objective of this article is to evaluate the study design, rational and results of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Therapy (CDOT) to heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study was a double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical study to evaluate DFUs over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed and the secondary outcome that was reported was the time to ulcer healing. In the per protocol analysis and in the intent to treat analysis, a higher proportion of DFUs healed in the CDOT group (per protocol 46{\%} vs 22{\%}, P =.02, intent to treat 31.5{\%} vs 15.1{\%}, P =.03). CDOT patients healed ulcers faster compared to the in the sham treatment arm (P =.026)",
keywords = "diabetes, healing, topical oxygen, ulceration",
author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Ryan, {Easton C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1932296817717999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "892--893",
journal = "Journal of diabetes science and technology",
issn = "1932-2968",
publisher = "Diabetes Technology Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing?

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Ryan, Easton C.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - The objective of this article is to evaluate the study design, rational and results of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Therapy (CDOT) to heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study was a double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical study to evaluate DFUs over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed and the secondary outcome that was reported was the time to ulcer healing. In the per protocol analysis and in the intent to treat analysis, a higher proportion of DFUs healed in the CDOT group (per protocol 46% vs 22%, P =.02, intent to treat 31.5% vs 15.1%, P =.03). CDOT patients healed ulcers faster compared to the in the sham treatment arm (P =.026)

AB - The objective of this article is to evaluate the study design, rational and results of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Therapy (CDOT) to heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study was a double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical study to evaluate DFUs over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed and the secondary outcome that was reported was the time to ulcer healing. In the per protocol analysis and in the intent to treat analysis, a higher proportion of DFUs healed in the CDOT group (per protocol 46% vs 22%, P =.02, intent to treat 31.5% vs 15.1%, P =.03). CDOT patients healed ulcers faster compared to the in the sham treatment arm (P =.026)

KW - diabetes

KW - healing

KW - topical oxygen

KW - ulceration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028660649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028660649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1932296817717999

DO - 10.1177/1932296817717999

M3 - Article

C2 - 28728437

AN - SCOPUS:85028660649

VL - 11

SP - 892

EP - 893

JO - Journal of diabetes science and technology

JF - Journal of diabetes science and technology

SN - 1932-2968

IS - 5

ER -