Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons

Joseph Lopez, Afshin Ameri, Srinivas M. Susarla, Sashank Reddy, Ashwin Soni, J. W. Tong, Neda Amini, Rizwan Ahmed, James W. May, W. P.Andrew Lee, Amir Dorafshar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction It is currently unknown whether formal research training has an influence on academic advancement in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether formal research training was associated with higher research productivity, academic rank, and procurement of extramural National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in plastic surgery, comparing academic surgeons who completed said research training with those without. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of full-time academic plastic surgeons in the United States. The main predictor variable was formal research training, defined as completion of a postdoctoral research fellowship or attainment of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The primary outcome was scientific productivity measured by the Hirsh-index (h-index, the number of publications, h that have at least h citations each). The secondary outcomes were academic rank and NIH funding. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. Results A total of 607 academic surgeons were identified from 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery training programs. In all, 179 (29.5%) surgeons completed formal research training. The mean h-index was 11.7 ± 9.9. And, 58 (9.6%) surgeons successfully procured NIH funding. The distribution of academic rank was the following: endowed professor (5.4%), professor (23.9%), associate professor (23.4%), assistant professor (46.0%), and instructor (1.3%). In a multiple regression analysis, completion of formal research training was significantly predictive of a higher h-index and successful procurement of NIH funding. Conclusion Current evidence demonstrates that formal research training is associated with higher scientific productivity and increased likelihood of future NIH funding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-428
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

academic success
Plastic Surgery
surgery
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research
funding
university teacher
health
productivity
Graduate Medical Education
Surgeons
Accreditation
accreditation
cross-sectional study
assistant
Publications
training program
instructor
regression analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • academic practice
  • h-index
  • postdoctoral research training
  • research training
  • residency
  • surgical training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons. / Lopez, Joseph; Ameri, Afshin; Susarla, Srinivas M.; Reddy, Sashank; Soni, Ashwin; Tong, J. W.; Amini, Neda; Ahmed, Rizwan; May, James W.; Lee, W. P.Andrew; Dorafshar, Amir.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 73, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 422-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopez, J, Ameri, A, Susarla, SM, Reddy, S, Soni, A, Tong, JW, Amini, N, Ahmed, R, May, JW, Lee, WPA & Dorafshar, A 2016, 'Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons', Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.001
Lopez, Joseph ; Ameri, Afshin ; Susarla, Srinivas M. ; Reddy, Sashank ; Soni, Ashwin ; Tong, J. W. ; Amini, Neda ; Ahmed, Rizwan ; May, James W. ; Lee, W. P.Andrew ; Dorafshar, Amir. / Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2016 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 422-428.
@article{dd642072f20e426492de7a12d3932053,
title = "Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons",
abstract = "Introduction It is currently unknown whether formal research training has an influence on academic advancement in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether formal research training was associated with higher research productivity, academic rank, and procurement of extramural National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in plastic surgery, comparing academic surgeons who completed said research training with those without. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of full-time academic plastic surgeons in the United States. The main predictor variable was formal research training, defined as completion of a postdoctoral research fellowship or attainment of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The primary outcome was scientific productivity measured by the Hirsh-index (h-index, the number of publications, h that have at least h citations each). The secondary outcomes were academic rank and NIH funding. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. Results A total of 607 academic surgeons were identified from 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery training programs. In all, 179 (29.5{\%}) surgeons completed formal research training. The mean h-index was 11.7 ± 9.9. And, 58 (9.6{\%}) surgeons successfully procured NIH funding. The distribution of academic rank was the following: endowed professor (5.4{\%}), professor (23.9{\%}), associate professor (23.4{\%}), assistant professor (46.0{\%}), and instructor (1.3{\%}). In a multiple regression analysis, completion of formal research training was significantly predictive of a higher h-index and successful procurement of NIH funding. Conclusion Current evidence demonstrates that formal research training is associated with higher scientific productivity and increased likelihood of future NIH funding.",
keywords = "academic practice, h-index, postdoctoral research training, research training, residency, surgical training",
author = "Joseph Lopez and Afshin Ameri and Susarla, {Srinivas M.} and Sashank Reddy and Ashwin Soni and Tong, {J. W.} and Neda Amini and Rizwan Ahmed and May, {James W.} and Lee, {W. P.Andrew} and Amir Dorafshar",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "422--428",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons

AU - Lopez, Joseph

AU - Ameri, Afshin

AU - Susarla, Srinivas M.

AU - Reddy, Sashank

AU - Soni, Ashwin

AU - Tong, J. W.

AU - Amini, Neda

AU - Ahmed, Rizwan

AU - May, James W.

AU - Lee, W. P.Andrew

AU - Dorafshar, Amir

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Introduction It is currently unknown whether formal research training has an influence on academic advancement in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether formal research training was associated with higher research productivity, academic rank, and procurement of extramural National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in plastic surgery, comparing academic surgeons who completed said research training with those without. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of full-time academic plastic surgeons in the United States. The main predictor variable was formal research training, defined as completion of a postdoctoral research fellowship or attainment of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The primary outcome was scientific productivity measured by the Hirsh-index (h-index, the number of publications, h that have at least h citations each). The secondary outcomes were academic rank and NIH funding. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. Results A total of 607 academic surgeons were identified from 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery training programs. In all, 179 (29.5%) surgeons completed formal research training. The mean h-index was 11.7 ± 9.9. And, 58 (9.6%) surgeons successfully procured NIH funding. The distribution of academic rank was the following: endowed professor (5.4%), professor (23.9%), associate professor (23.4%), assistant professor (46.0%), and instructor (1.3%). In a multiple regression analysis, completion of formal research training was significantly predictive of a higher h-index and successful procurement of NIH funding. Conclusion Current evidence demonstrates that formal research training is associated with higher scientific productivity and increased likelihood of future NIH funding.

AB - Introduction It is currently unknown whether formal research training has an influence on academic advancement in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether formal research training was associated with higher research productivity, academic rank, and procurement of extramural National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in plastic surgery, comparing academic surgeons who completed said research training with those without. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of full-time academic plastic surgeons in the United States. The main predictor variable was formal research training, defined as completion of a postdoctoral research fellowship or attainment of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The primary outcome was scientific productivity measured by the Hirsh-index (h-index, the number of publications, h that have at least h citations each). The secondary outcomes were academic rank and NIH funding. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. Results A total of 607 academic surgeons were identified from 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery training programs. In all, 179 (29.5%) surgeons completed formal research training. The mean h-index was 11.7 ± 9.9. And, 58 (9.6%) surgeons successfully procured NIH funding. The distribution of academic rank was the following: endowed professor (5.4%), professor (23.9%), associate professor (23.4%), assistant professor (46.0%), and instructor (1.3%). In a multiple regression analysis, completion of formal research training was significantly predictive of a higher h-index and successful procurement of NIH funding. Conclusion Current evidence demonstrates that formal research training is associated with higher scientific productivity and increased likelihood of future NIH funding.

KW - academic practice

KW - h-index

KW - postdoctoral research training

KW - research training

KW - residency

KW - surgical training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953791563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953791563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 26796512

AN - SCOPUS:84953791563

VL - 73

SP - 422

EP - 428

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 3

ER -