Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients

Stephen W. Davies, Jimmy T. Efird, Christopher A. Guidry, Tjasa Hranjec, Rosemarie Metzger, Brian R. Swenson, Robert G. Sawyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding the impact of inappropriate, initial antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection among surgical patients. We hypothesized that inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy would predict increased mortality risk compared with appropriate therapy. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all surgical patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 1996 to 2007 and treated for sepsis. "Appropriate" empiric antibiotic treatment was determined by sensitivity testing. Demographics and comorbidities, infection sites, infection organisms, and outcomes were compared between inappropriately and appropriately treated groups. Multivariable log-binomial regression was performed. There were 2,855 patients (7,158 infectious episodes) identified by culture analysis as either appropriately or inappropriately treated. Three hundred seventeen (15%) inappropriately treated infectious episodes resulted in death compared with 718 (14%) of the appropriately treated infectious episodes. After adjusting for statistically significant variables, inappropriately treated episodes of infection were not found to be associated with an increased risk for mortality compared with appropriately treated episodes of infection (relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 - 1.02; P = 0.36). Our study observed no difference in mortality between appropriately and inappropriately treated infections within a surgical population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-191
Number of pages7
JournalShock (Augusta, Ga.)
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Infection
Mortality
Therapeutics
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Tertiary Care Centers
Comorbidity
Sepsis
Demography
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Davies, S. W., Efird, J. T., Guidry, C. A., Hranjec, T., Metzger, R., Swenson, B. R., & Sawyer, R. G. (2014). Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients. Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 42(3), 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000192

Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients. / Davies, Stephen W.; Efird, Jimmy T.; Guidry, Christopher A.; Hranjec, Tjasa; Metzger, Rosemarie; Swenson, Brian R.; Sawyer, Robert G.

In: Shock (Augusta, Ga.), Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 185-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davies, SW, Efird, JT, Guidry, CA, Hranjec, T, Metzger, R, Swenson, BR & Sawyer, RG 2014, 'Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients', Shock (Augusta, Ga.), vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000192
Davies, Stephen W. ; Efird, Jimmy T. ; Guidry, Christopher A. ; Hranjec, Tjasa ; Metzger, Rosemarie ; Swenson, Brian R. ; Sawyer, Robert G. / Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients. In: Shock (Augusta, Ga.). 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 185-191.
@article{0d5e46af8bde4d87a2538152d42e9ac9,
title = "Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients",
abstract = "Previous studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding the impact of inappropriate, initial antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection among surgical patients. We hypothesized that inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy would predict increased mortality risk compared with appropriate therapy. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all surgical patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 1996 to 2007 and treated for sepsis. {"}Appropriate{"} empiric antibiotic treatment was determined by sensitivity testing. Demographics and comorbidities, infection sites, infection organisms, and outcomes were compared between inappropriately and appropriately treated groups. Multivariable log-binomial regression was performed. There were 2,855 patients (7,158 infectious episodes) identified by culture analysis as either appropriately or inappropriately treated. Three hundred seventeen (15{\%}) inappropriately treated infectious episodes resulted in death compared with 718 (14{\%}) of the appropriately treated infectious episodes. After adjusting for statistically significant variables, inappropriately treated episodes of infection were not found to be associated with an increased risk for mortality compared with appropriately treated episodes of infection (relative risk, 1.0; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.99 - 1.02; P = 0.36). Our study observed no difference in mortality between appropriately and inappropriately treated infections within a surgical population.",
author = "Davies, {Stephen W.} and Efird, {Jimmy T.} and Guidry, {Christopher A.} and Tjasa Hranjec and Rosemarie Metzger and Swenson, {Brian R.} and Sawyer, {Robert G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SHK.0000000000000192",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "185--191",
journal = "Shock",
issn = "1073-2322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does it Matter if we get it right? Impact of appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy among surgical patients

AU - Davies, Stephen W.

AU - Efird, Jimmy T.

AU - Guidry, Christopher A.

AU - Hranjec, Tjasa

AU - Metzger, Rosemarie

AU - Swenson, Brian R.

AU - Sawyer, Robert G.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Previous studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding the impact of inappropriate, initial antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection among surgical patients. We hypothesized that inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy would predict increased mortality risk compared with appropriate therapy. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all surgical patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 1996 to 2007 and treated for sepsis. "Appropriate" empiric antibiotic treatment was determined by sensitivity testing. Demographics and comorbidities, infection sites, infection organisms, and outcomes were compared between inappropriately and appropriately treated groups. Multivariable log-binomial regression was performed. There were 2,855 patients (7,158 infectious episodes) identified by culture analysis as either appropriately or inappropriately treated. Three hundred seventeen (15%) inappropriately treated infectious episodes resulted in death compared with 718 (14%) of the appropriately treated infectious episodes. After adjusting for statistically significant variables, inappropriately treated episodes of infection were not found to be associated with an increased risk for mortality compared with appropriately treated episodes of infection (relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 - 1.02; P = 0.36). Our study observed no difference in mortality between appropriately and inappropriately treated infections within a surgical population.

AB - Previous studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding the impact of inappropriate, initial antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection among surgical patients. We hypothesized that inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy would predict increased mortality risk compared with appropriate therapy. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all surgical patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 1996 to 2007 and treated for sepsis. "Appropriate" empiric antibiotic treatment was determined by sensitivity testing. Demographics and comorbidities, infection sites, infection organisms, and outcomes were compared between inappropriately and appropriately treated groups. Multivariable log-binomial regression was performed. There were 2,855 patients (7,158 infectious episodes) identified by culture analysis as either appropriately or inappropriately treated. Three hundred seventeen (15%) inappropriately treated infectious episodes resulted in death compared with 718 (14%) of the appropriately treated infectious episodes. After adjusting for statistically significant variables, inappropriately treated episodes of infection were not found to be associated with an increased risk for mortality compared with appropriately treated episodes of infection (relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 - 1.02; P = 0.36). Our study observed no difference in mortality between appropriately and inappropriately treated infections within a surgical population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027941015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027941015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000192

DO - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000192

M3 - Article

C2 - 24727868

AN - SCOPUS:85027941015

VL - 42

SP - 185

EP - 191

JO - Shock

JF - Shock

SN - 1073-2322

IS - 3

ER -