Does managed care affect quality? Appropriateness, referral patterns, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy

Ethan A. Halm, Matthew J. Press, Stanley Tuhrim, Jason Wang, Mary Rojas, Mark R. Chassin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This was a population-based observational study to assess the impact of managed care (MC) on several dimensions of quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) (N = 9308) in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess appropriateness and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery. Differences in patients, appropriateness, and outcomes were compared using chi-square tests; risk-adjusted outcomes were compared using regression. Fee-For-Service (FFS, N = 8691) and MC (N = 897) CEA patients had similar indications for surgery, perioperative risk, and comorbidities. There were no differences in inappropriateness between FFS and MC (8.6% vs 8.4%). MC patients were less likely to use a high-volume surgeon (20.1% vs 13.5%) or hospital (20.5% vs 13.0%, P <.05). There were no differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or stroke (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.69-1.37). Medicare MC plans did not have a positive impact on inappropriateness, referral patterns, or outcomes of CEA. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:448-456).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-456
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Managed Care Programs
Referral and Consultation
Medicare
Stroke
Fee-for-Service Plans
Quality of Health Care
Chi-Square Distribution
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Observational Studies
Comorbidity
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Fee-for-service
  • Health services overuse
  • Managed care
  • Medicare
  • Outcomes
  • Referral patterns
  • Volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Does managed care affect quality? Appropriateness, referral patterns, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. / Halm, Ethan A.; Press, Matthew J.; Tuhrim, Stanley; Wang, Jason; Rojas, Mary; Chassin, Mark R.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 23, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 448-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halm, Ethan A. ; Press, Matthew J. ; Tuhrim, Stanley ; Wang, Jason ; Rojas, Mary ; Chassin, Mark R. / Does managed care affect quality? Appropriateness, referral patterns, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. In: American Journal of Medical Quality. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 448-456.
@article{98aa96b745684f5dae4f3035fae93320,
title = "Does managed care affect quality? Appropriateness, referral patterns, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy",
abstract = "This was a population-based observational study to assess the impact of managed care (MC) on several dimensions of quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) (N = 9308) in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess appropriateness and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery. Differences in patients, appropriateness, and outcomes were compared using chi-square tests; risk-adjusted outcomes were compared using regression. Fee-For-Service (FFS, N = 8691) and MC (N = 897) CEA patients had similar indications for surgery, perioperative risk, and comorbidities. There were no differences in inappropriateness between FFS and MC (8.6{\%} vs 8.4{\%}). MC patients were less likely to use a high-volume surgeon (20.1{\%} vs 13.5{\%}) or hospital (20.5{\%} vs 13.0{\%}, P <.05). There were no differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or stroke (OR = 0.97; 95{\%} CI = 0.69-1.37). Medicare MC plans did not have a positive impact on inappropriateness, referral patterns, or outcomes of CEA. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:448-456).",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Carotid endarterectomy, Fee-for-service, Health services overuse, Managed care, Medicare, Outcomes, Referral patterns, Volume",
author = "Halm, {Ethan A.} and Press, {Matthew J.} and Stanley Tuhrim and Jason Wang and Mary Rojas and Chassin, {Mark R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1062860608323926",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "448--456",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does managed care affect quality? Appropriateness, referral patterns, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy

AU - Halm, Ethan A.

AU - Press, Matthew J.

AU - Tuhrim, Stanley

AU - Wang, Jason

AU - Rojas, Mary

AU - Chassin, Mark R.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - This was a population-based observational study to assess the impact of managed care (MC) on several dimensions of quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) (N = 9308) in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess appropriateness and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery. Differences in patients, appropriateness, and outcomes were compared using chi-square tests; risk-adjusted outcomes were compared using regression. Fee-For-Service (FFS, N = 8691) and MC (N = 897) CEA patients had similar indications for surgery, perioperative risk, and comorbidities. There were no differences in inappropriateness between FFS and MC (8.6% vs 8.4%). MC patients were less likely to use a high-volume surgeon (20.1% vs 13.5%) or hospital (20.5% vs 13.0%, P <.05). There were no differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or stroke (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.69-1.37). Medicare MC plans did not have a positive impact on inappropriateness, referral patterns, or outcomes of CEA. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:448-456).

AB - This was a population-based observational study to assess the impact of managed care (MC) on several dimensions of quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) (N = 9308) in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess appropriateness and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery. Differences in patients, appropriateness, and outcomes were compared using chi-square tests; risk-adjusted outcomes were compared using regression. Fee-For-Service (FFS, N = 8691) and MC (N = 897) CEA patients had similar indications for surgery, perioperative risk, and comorbidities. There were no differences in inappropriateness between FFS and MC (8.6% vs 8.4%). MC patients were less likely to use a high-volume surgeon (20.1% vs 13.5%) or hospital (20.5% vs 13.0%, P <.05). There were no differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or stroke (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.69-1.37). Medicare MC plans did not have a positive impact on inappropriateness, referral patterns, or outcomes of CEA. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:448-456).

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Fee-for-service

KW - Health services overuse

KW - Managed care

KW - Medicare

KW - Outcomes

KW - Referral patterns

KW - Volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649117762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649117762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860608323926

DO - 10.1177/1062860608323926

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 448

EP - 456

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 6

ER -