Does the method of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation affect the vestibular evoked myogenic potential response?

Brandon Isaacson, Emily Murphy, Helen Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different methods of sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) activation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Forty normal volunteers were tested using three different methods of SCM activation: sitting with the head turned away from the test ear (SIT), supine with the head held straight up (SHU), and supine with the head held up and turned away from the test ear (SHT). Dependent measures were latency, and amplitude. Head and body position significantly affected the amplitude of the VEMP, but had no significant effect on latency. Testing subjects in the supine position with the head up and turned toward the non-test ear yielded the most robust amplitude response and sternocleidomastoid EMG activity. When amplitude measures where corrected according to tonic electromyographic (EMG) activity no significant difference was noted between the three different test positions. The increased amplitude in the supine with head turned position can be directly attributed to increased tonic SCM EMG activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-191
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation
Volume16
Issue number4-5
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Keywords

  • Otoliths
  • Saccule
  • Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does the method of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation affect the vestibular evoked myogenic potential response?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this