Ear Advantage for Musical Location and Relative Pitch: Effects of Musical Training and Attention

Joanna L. Hutchison, Timothy L. Hubbard, Nicholas A. Hubbard, Bart Rypma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Trained musicians have been found to exhibit a right-ear advantage for high tones and a left-ear advantage for low tones. We investigated whether this right/high, left/low pattern of musical processing advantage exists in listeners who had varying levels of musical experience, and whether such a pattern might be modulated by attentional strategy. A dichotic listening paradigm was used in which different melodic sequences were presented to each ear, and listeners attended to (a) the left ear or the right ear or (b) the higher pitched tones or the lower pitched tones. Listeners judged whether tone-to-tone transitions within each melodic sequence moved upward or downward in pitch. Only musically experienced listeners could adequately judge the direction of successive pitch transitions when attending to a specific ear; however, all listeners could judge the direction of successive pitch transitions within a high-tone stream or a low-tone stream. Overall, listeners exhibited greater accuracy when attending to relatively higher pitches, but there was no evidence to support a right/high, left/low bias. Results were consistent with effects of attentional strategy rather than an ear advantage for high or low tones. Implications for a potential performer/audience paradox in listening space are considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-762
Number of pages18
JournalPerception
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ear
Processing

Keywords

  • attention
  • cerebral asymmetry
  • dichotic listening
  • ear advantage
  • musical experience
  • musical training
  • performer/audience paradox
  • streaming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Ear Advantage for Musical Location and Relative Pitch : Effects of Musical Training and Attention. / Hutchison, Joanna L.; Hubbard, Timothy L.; Hubbard, Nicholas A.; Rypma, Bart.

In: Perception, Vol. 46, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 745-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hutchison, Joanna L. ; Hubbard, Timothy L. ; Hubbard, Nicholas A. ; Rypma, Bart. / Ear Advantage for Musical Location and Relative Pitch : Effects of Musical Training and Attention. In: Perception. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 6. pp. 745-762.
@article{c9dc1b0299b6496eb39c84b16df0f520,
title = "Ear Advantage for Musical Location and Relative Pitch: Effects of Musical Training and Attention",
abstract = "Trained musicians have been found to exhibit a right-ear advantage for high tones and a left-ear advantage for low tones. We investigated whether this right/high, left/low pattern of musical processing advantage exists in listeners who had varying levels of musical experience, and whether such a pattern might be modulated by attentional strategy. A dichotic listening paradigm was used in which different melodic sequences were presented to each ear, and listeners attended to (a) the left ear or the right ear or (b) the higher pitched tones or the lower pitched tones. Listeners judged whether tone-to-tone transitions within each melodic sequence moved upward or downward in pitch. Only musically experienced listeners could adequately judge the direction of successive pitch transitions when attending to a specific ear; however, all listeners could judge the direction of successive pitch transitions within a high-tone stream or a low-tone stream. Overall, listeners exhibited greater accuracy when attending to relatively higher pitches, but there was no evidence to support a right/high, left/low bias. Results were consistent with effects of attentional strategy rather than an ear advantage for high or low tones. Implications for a potential performer/audience paradox in listening space are considered.",
keywords = "attention, cerebral asymmetry, dichotic listening, ear advantage, musical experience, musical training, performer/audience paradox, streaming",
author = "Hutchison, {Joanna L.} and Hubbard, {Timothy L.} and Hubbard, {Nicholas A.} and Bart Rypma",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0301006616684238",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "745--762",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ear Advantage for Musical Location and Relative Pitch

T2 - Effects of Musical Training and Attention

AU - Hutchison, Joanna L.

AU - Hubbard, Timothy L.

AU - Hubbard, Nicholas A.

AU - Rypma, Bart

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Trained musicians have been found to exhibit a right-ear advantage for high tones and a left-ear advantage for low tones. We investigated whether this right/high, left/low pattern of musical processing advantage exists in listeners who had varying levels of musical experience, and whether such a pattern might be modulated by attentional strategy. A dichotic listening paradigm was used in which different melodic sequences were presented to each ear, and listeners attended to (a) the left ear or the right ear or (b) the higher pitched tones or the lower pitched tones. Listeners judged whether tone-to-tone transitions within each melodic sequence moved upward or downward in pitch. Only musically experienced listeners could adequately judge the direction of successive pitch transitions when attending to a specific ear; however, all listeners could judge the direction of successive pitch transitions within a high-tone stream or a low-tone stream. Overall, listeners exhibited greater accuracy when attending to relatively higher pitches, but there was no evidence to support a right/high, left/low bias. Results were consistent with effects of attentional strategy rather than an ear advantage for high or low tones. Implications for a potential performer/audience paradox in listening space are considered.

AB - Trained musicians have been found to exhibit a right-ear advantage for high tones and a left-ear advantage for low tones. We investigated whether this right/high, left/low pattern of musical processing advantage exists in listeners who had varying levels of musical experience, and whether such a pattern might be modulated by attentional strategy. A dichotic listening paradigm was used in which different melodic sequences were presented to each ear, and listeners attended to (a) the left ear or the right ear or (b) the higher pitched tones or the lower pitched tones. Listeners judged whether tone-to-tone transitions within each melodic sequence moved upward or downward in pitch. Only musically experienced listeners could adequately judge the direction of successive pitch transitions when attending to a specific ear; however, all listeners could judge the direction of successive pitch transitions within a high-tone stream or a low-tone stream. Overall, listeners exhibited greater accuracy when attending to relatively higher pitches, but there was no evidence to support a right/high, left/low bias. Results were consistent with effects of attentional strategy rather than an ear advantage for high or low tones. Implications for a potential performer/audience paradox in listening space are considered.

KW - attention

KW - cerebral asymmetry

KW - dichotic listening

KW - ear advantage

KW - musical experience

KW - musical training

KW - performer/audience paradox

KW - streaming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019845035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019845035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0301006616684238

DO - 10.1177/0301006616684238

M3 - Article

C2 - 28523983

AN - SCOPUS:85019845035

VL - 46

SP - 745

EP - 762

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 6

ER -