Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients: A randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up outcomes

Travis Whitfill, Robbie Haggard, Samuel M. Bierner, Glenn Pransky, Robert G. Hassett, Robert J. Gatchel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. Methods Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. Results At 1-year followup, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. Conclusion The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBP patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-263
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics
Pain
Aptitude
Cost Savings
Self Report

Keywords

  • Biopsychosocial
  • Chronicity
  • Early intervention
  • High risk
  • Low back pain
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients : A randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up outcomes. / Whitfill, Travis; Haggard, Robbie; Bierner, Samuel M.; Pransky, Glenn; Hassett, Robert G.; Gatchel, Robert J.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 256-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whitfill, Travis ; Haggard, Robbie ; Bierner, Samuel M. ; Pransky, Glenn ; Hassett, Robert G. ; Gatchel, Robert J. / Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients : A randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up outcomes. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 256-263.
@article{da18cf3b3461490eb00656413673509d,
title = "Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients: A randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up outcomes",
abstract = "Introduction In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. Methods Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. Results At 1-year followup, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. Conclusion The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBP patients.",
keywords = "Biopsychosocial, Chronicity, Early intervention, High risk, Low back pain, Treatment",
author = "Travis Whitfill and Robbie Haggard and Bierner, {Samuel M.} and Glenn Pransky and Hassett, {Robert G.} and Gatchel, {Robert J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-010-9238-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "256--263",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients

T2 - A randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up outcomes

AU - Whitfill, Travis

AU - Haggard, Robbie

AU - Bierner, Samuel M.

AU - Pransky, Glenn

AU - Hassett, Robert G.

AU - Gatchel, Robert J.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Introduction In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. Methods Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. Results At 1-year followup, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. Conclusion The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBP patients.

AB - Introduction In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. Methods Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. Results At 1-year followup, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. Conclusion The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBP patients.

KW - Biopsychosocial

KW - Chronicity

KW - Early intervention

KW - High risk

KW - Low back pain

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955715531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955715531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-010-9238-4

DO - 10.1007/s10926-010-9238-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20369277

AN - SCOPUS:77955715531

VL - 20

SP - 256

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 2

ER -