Echocardiography in cardiac arrest: An emergency medicine review

Brit Long, Stephen Alerhand, Kurian Maliel, Alex Koyfman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac arrest management primarily focuses on optimal chest compressions and early defibrillation for shockable cardiac rhythms. Non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole present challenges in management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in cardiac arrest is promising. Objectives: This review provides a focused assessment of POCUS in cardiac arrest, with an overview of transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), uses in arrest, and literature support. Discussion: Cardiac arrest can be distinguished between shockable and non-shockable rhythms, with management varying based on the rhythm. POCUS provides a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the emergency department (ED), which may improve accuracy in clinical decision-making. Several protocols incorporate POCUS based on different cardiac views. TTE includes parasternal long axis, parasternal short axis, apical 4-chamber, and subxiphoid views, which may be used in cardiac arrest for diagnosis of underlying cause and potential prognostication. TEE is conducted by inserting the probe into the esophagus of intubated patients, with several studies evaluating its use in cardiac arrest. It is associated with few adverse effects, while allowing continued compressions (and evaluation of those compressions) and not interrupting resuscitation efforts. Conclusions: POCUS is a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in cardiac arrest, with recent literature supporting its diagnostic ability. TTE can guide resuscitation efforts dependent on the rhythm, though TTE should not interrupt other resuscitation measures. TEE can be useful during arrest, but further studies based in the ED are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Heart Arrest
Point-of-Care Systems
Echocardiography
Resuscitation
Hospital Emergency Service
Esophagus
Thorax

Keywords

  • Asystole
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Echocardiography
  • Non-shockable
  • Point-of-care ultrasound
  • Pulseless electrical activity
  • Shockable
  • Ultrasound
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Ventricular tachycardia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Echocardiography in cardiac arrest : An emergency medicine review. / Long, Brit; Alerhand, Stephen; Maliel, Kurian; Koyfman, Alex.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{addb13ba39c94c99bf14d55f8774df83,
title = "Echocardiography in cardiac arrest: An emergency medicine review",
abstract = "Introduction: Cardiac arrest management primarily focuses on optimal chest compressions and early defibrillation for shockable cardiac rhythms. Non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole present challenges in management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in cardiac arrest is promising. Objectives: This review provides a focused assessment of POCUS in cardiac arrest, with an overview of transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), uses in arrest, and literature support. Discussion: Cardiac arrest can be distinguished between shockable and non-shockable rhythms, with management varying based on the rhythm. POCUS provides a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the emergency department (ED), which may improve accuracy in clinical decision-making. Several protocols incorporate POCUS based on different cardiac views. TTE includes parasternal long axis, parasternal short axis, apical 4-chamber, and subxiphoid views, which may be used in cardiac arrest for diagnosis of underlying cause and potential prognostication. TEE is conducted by inserting the probe into the esophagus of intubated patients, with several studies evaluating its use in cardiac arrest. It is associated with few adverse effects, while allowing continued compressions (and evaluation of those compressions) and not interrupting resuscitation efforts. Conclusions: POCUS is a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in cardiac arrest, with recent literature supporting its diagnostic ability. TTE can guide resuscitation efforts dependent on the rhythm, though TTE should not interrupt other resuscitation measures. TEE can be useful during arrest, but further studies based in the ED are needed.",
keywords = "Asystole, Cardiac arrest, Echocardiography, Non-shockable, Point-of-care ultrasound, Pulseless electrical activity, Shockable, Ultrasound, Ventricular fibrillation, Ventricular tachycardia",
author = "Brit Long and Stephen Alerhand and Kurian Maliel and Alex Koyfman",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.031",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echocardiography in cardiac arrest

T2 - An emergency medicine review

AU - Long, Brit

AU - Alerhand, Stephen

AU - Maliel, Kurian

AU - Koyfman, Alex

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Cardiac arrest management primarily focuses on optimal chest compressions and early defibrillation for shockable cardiac rhythms. Non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole present challenges in management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in cardiac arrest is promising. Objectives: This review provides a focused assessment of POCUS in cardiac arrest, with an overview of transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), uses in arrest, and literature support. Discussion: Cardiac arrest can be distinguished between shockable and non-shockable rhythms, with management varying based on the rhythm. POCUS provides a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the emergency department (ED), which may improve accuracy in clinical decision-making. Several protocols incorporate POCUS based on different cardiac views. TTE includes parasternal long axis, parasternal short axis, apical 4-chamber, and subxiphoid views, which may be used in cardiac arrest for diagnosis of underlying cause and potential prognostication. TEE is conducted by inserting the probe into the esophagus of intubated patients, with several studies evaluating its use in cardiac arrest. It is associated with few adverse effects, while allowing continued compressions (and evaluation of those compressions) and not interrupting resuscitation efforts. Conclusions: POCUS is a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in cardiac arrest, with recent literature supporting its diagnostic ability. TTE can guide resuscitation efforts dependent on the rhythm, though TTE should not interrupt other resuscitation measures. TEE can be useful during arrest, but further studies based in the ED are needed.

AB - Introduction: Cardiac arrest management primarily focuses on optimal chest compressions and early defibrillation for shockable cardiac rhythms. Non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole present challenges in management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in cardiac arrest is promising. Objectives: This review provides a focused assessment of POCUS in cardiac arrest, with an overview of transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), uses in arrest, and literature support. Discussion: Cardiac arrest can be distinguished between shockable and non-shockable rhythms, with management varying based on the rhythm. POCUS provides a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the emergency department (ED), which may improve accuracy in clinical decision-making. Several protocols incorporate POCUS based on different cardiac views. TTE includes parasternal long axis, parasternal short axis, apical 4-chamber, and subxiphoid views, which may be used in cardiac arrest for diagnosis of underlying cause and potential prognostication. TEE is conducted by inserting the probe into the esophagus of intubated patients, with several studies evaluating its use in cardiac arrest. It is associated with few adverse effects, while allowing continued compressions (and evaluation of those compressions) and not interrupting resuscitation efforts. Conclusions: POCUS is a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in cardiac arrest, with recent literature supporting its diagnostic ability. TTE can guide resuscitation efforts dependent on the rhythm, though TTE should not interrupt other resuscitation measures. TEE can be useful during arrest, but further studies based in the ED are needed.

KW - Asystole

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Non-shockable

KW - Point-of-care ultrasound

KW - Pulseless electrical activity

KW - Shockable

KW - Ultrasound

KW - Ventricular fibrillation

KW - Ventricular tachycardia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038828845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038828845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.031

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 29269162

AN - SCOPUS:85038828845

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

ER -