Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical investigation of the degree to which testing predicts children's real-world functioning following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is sparse. This article reviews the research in neuropsychology, which offers only moderate correlations between test scores and everyday functioning. This line of research is hindered by several methodological issues: Difficulty translating performance on standardized testing into real-world capacities, measurement of real-world functioning, developmental factors, and the influence of intervening variables in the natural environment. Ecologically valid assessment may require multiple data sources. More research is needed to respond effectively to questions about children's everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)973-988
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Research
Neuropsychology
Information Storage and Retrieval
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Brain injury
  • Child
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury. / Silver, C. H.

In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, p. 973-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8d44505589246aba3e78ad7444ae427,
title = "Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Empirical investigation of the degree to which testing predicts children's real-world functioning following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is sparse. This article reviews the research in neuropsychology, which offers only moderate correlations between test scores and everyday functioning. This line of research is hindered by several methodological issues: Difficulty translating performance on standardized testing into real-world capacities, measurement of real-world functioning, developmental factors, and the influence of intervening variables in the natural environment. Ecologically valid assessment may require multiple data sources. More research is needed to respond effectively to questions about children's everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury.",
keywords = "Assessment, Brain injury, Child, Validity",
author = "Silver, {C. H.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "973--988",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury

AU - Silver, C. H.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Empirical investigation of the degree to which testing predicts children's real-world functioning following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is sparse. This article reviews the research in neuropsychology, which offers only moderate correlations between test scores and everyday functioning. This line of research is hindered by several methodological issues: Difficulty translating performance on standardized testing into real-world capacities, measurement of real-world functioning, developmental factors, and the influence of intervening variables in the natural environment. Ecologically valid assessment may require multiple data sources. More research is needed to respond effectively to questions about children's everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury.

AB - Empirical investigation of the degree to which testing predicts children's real-world functioning following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is sparse. This article reviews the research in neuropsychology, which offers only moderate correlations between test scores and everyday functioning. This line of research is hindered by several methodological issues: Difficulty translating performance on standardized testing into real-world capacities, measurement of real-world functioning, developmental factors, and the influence of intervening variables in the natural environment. Ecologically valid assessment may require multiple data sources. More research is needed to respond effectively to questions about children's everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury.

KW - Assessment

KW - Brain injury

KW - Child

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033854372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033854372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 973

EP - 988

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 4

ER -