Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography

Daniel C. Diffin, John R. Leyendecker, Stephen P. Johnson, Ryan J. Zucker, Paul J. Grebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

185 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. This study examines the anatomic distribution of emboli on pulmonary angiography and attempts to determine the relationship of vessel size to interobserver agreement, two factors having important implications in comparing pulmonary angiography with cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty-five consecutive pulmonary angiograms were reviewed retrospectively by three interventional radiologists. Initial interpretations were recorded and compared to determine interobserver agreement on a per-patient and per-embolus basis. Discordant interpretations were reviewed by all radiologists for a consensus interpretation. RESULTS. Unanimous per-patient agreement occurred in 91% (114/125) of initial interpretations. The largest artery containing acute pulmonary embolism was segmental or larger in 24 patients (83% of patients with acute positive findings, 19% of all patients) and subsegmental in only five patients (17% and 4%, respectively). On a per-patient basis, initial interobserver agreement averaged 45% and unanimous consensus agreement was achieved for 79% of patients having isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Consensus readings altered initial per-patient interpretations for 30% of patients having only subsegmental pulmonary embolism; per-embolus interpretations were altered for 37% of all subsegmental emboli. CONCLUSION. Subsegmental emboli occurring as isolated findings are relatively rare. Approximately one third of subsegmental emboli and one third of patients having isolated subsegmental emboli may be initially misdiagnosed on pulmonary angiography. Objections to cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism based on the inability to detect subsegmental pulmonary embolism when compared with pulmonary angiography should be reexamined with this data in mind.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1085-1089
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume171
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Embolism
Angiography
Lung
Pulmonary Embolism
Diagnostic Errors
Reading
Arteries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. / Diffin, Daniel C.; Leyendecker, John R.; Johnson, Stephen P.; Zucker, Ryan J.; Grebe, Paul J.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 171, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 1085-1089.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diffin, Daniel C. ; Leyendecker, John R. ; Johnson, Stephen P. ; Zucker, Ryan J. ; Grebe, Paul J. / Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1998 ; Vol. 171, No. 4. pp. 1085-1089.
@article{209b1c656c564993b3c665874b62b1d1,
title = "Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. This study examines the anatomic distribution of emboli on pulmonary angiography and attempts to determine the relationship of vessel size to interobserver agreement, two factors having important implications in comparing pulmonary angiography with cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty-five consecutive pulmonary angiograms were reviewed retrospectively by three interventional radiologists. Initial interpretations were recorded and compared to determine interobserver agreement on a per-patient and per-embolus basis. Discordant interpretations were reviewed by all radiologists for a consensus interpretation. RESULTS. Unanimous per-patient agreement occurred in 91{\%} (114/125) of initial interpretations. The largest artery containing acute pulmonary embolism was segmental or larger in 24 patients (83{\%} of patients with acute positive findings, 19{\%} of all patients) and subsegmental in only five patients (17{\%} and 4{\%}, respectively). On a per-patient basis, initial interobserver agreement averaged 45{\%} and unanimous consensus agreement was achieved for 79{\%} of patients having isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Consensus readings altered initial per-patient interpretations for 30{\%} of patients having only subsegmental pulmonary embolism; per-embolus interpretations were altered for 37{\%} of all subsegmental emboli. CONCLUSION. Subsegmental emboli occurring as isolated findings are relatively rare. Approximately one third of subsegmental emboli and one third of patients having isolated subsegmental emboli may be initially misdiagnosed on pulmonary angiography. Objections to cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism based on the inability to detect subsegmental pulmonary embolism when compared with pulmonary angiography should be reexamined with this data in mind.",
author = "Diffin, {Daniel C.} and Leyendecker, {John R.} and Johnson, {Stephen P.} and Zucker, {Ryan J.} and Grebe, {Paul J.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.171.4.9763002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "1085--1089",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography

AU - Diffin, Daniel C.

AU - Leyendecker, John R.

AU - Johnson, Stephen P.

AU - Zucker, Ryan J.

AU - Grebe, Paul J.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. This study examines the anatomic distribution of emboli on pulmonary angiography and attempts to determine the relationship of vessel size to interobserver agreement, two factors having important implications in comparing pulmonary angiography with cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty-five consecutive pulmonary angiograms were reviewed retrospectively by three interventional radiologists. Initial interpretations were recorded and compared to determine interobserver agreement on a per-patient and per-embolus basis. Discordant interpretations were reviewed by all radiologists for a consensus interpretation. RESULTS. Unanimous per-patient agreement occurred in 91% (114/125) of initial interpretations. The largest artery containing acute pulmonary embolism was segmental or larger in 24 patients (83% of patients with acute positive findings, 19% of all patients) and subsegmental in only five patients (17% and 4%, respectively). On a per-patient basis, initial interobserver agreement averaged 45% and unanimous consensus agreement was achieved for 79% of patients having isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Consensus readings altered initial per-patient interpretations for 30% of patients having only subsegmental pulmonary embolism; per-embolus interpretations were altered for 37% of all subsegmental emboli. CONCLUSION. Subsegmental emboli occurring as isolated findings are relatively rare. Approximately one third of subsegmental emboli and one third of patients having isolated subsegmental emboli may be initially misdiagnosed on pulmonary angiography. Objections to cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism based on the inability to detect subsegmental pulmonary embolism when compared with pulmonary angiography should be reexamined with this data in mind.

AB - OBJECTIVE. This study examines the anatomic distribution of emboli on pulmonary angiography and attempts to determine the relationship of vessel size to interobserver agreement, two factors having important implications in comparing pulmonary angiography with cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty-five consecutive pulmonary angiograms were reviewed retrospectively by three interventional radiologists. Initial interpretations were recorded and compared to determine interobserver agreement on a per-patient and per-embolus basis. Discordant interpretations were reviewed by all radiologists for a consensus interpretation. RESULTS. Unanimous per-patient agreement occurred in 91% (114/125) of initial interpretations. The largest artery containing acute pulmonary embolism was segmental or larger in 24 patients (83% of patients with acute positive findings, 19% of all patients) and subsegmental in only five patients (17% and 4%, respectively). On a per-patient basis, initial interobserver agreement averaged 45% and unanimous consensus agreement was achieved for 79% of patients having isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Consensus readings altered initial per-patient interpretations for 30% of patients having only subsegmental pulmonary embolism; per-embolus interpretations were altered for 37% of all subsegmental emboli. CONCLUSION. Subsegmental emboli occurring as isolated findings are relatively rare. Approximately one third of subsegmental emboli and one third of patients having isolated subsegmental emboli may be initially misdiagnosed on pulmonary angiography. Objections to cross-sectional imaging for pulmonary embolism based on the inability to detect subsegmental pulmonary embolism when compared with pulmonary angiography should be reexamined with this data in mind.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031655371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031655371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9763002

DO - 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9763002

M3 - Article

C2 - 9763002

AN - SCOPUS:0031655371

VL - 171

SP - 1085

EP - 1089

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -