Effect of high-intensity hypoxic training on sea-level swimming performances

M. J. Truijens, H. M. Toussaint, J. Dow, Benjamin D. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that high-intensity hypoxic training improves sea-level performances more than equivalent training in normoxia. Sixteen well-trained collegiate and Masters swimmers (10 women, 6 men) completed a 5-wk training program, consisting of three high-intensity training sessions in a flume and supplemental low- or moderate-intensity sessions in a pool each week. Subjects were matched for gender, performance level, and training history, and they were assigned to either hypoxic [Hypo; inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) = 15.3%, equivalent to a simulated altitude of 2,500 m] or normoxic (Norm; FIO2 = 20.9%) interval training in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. All pool training occurred under Norm conditions. The primary performance measures were 100- and 400-m freestyle time trials. Laboratory outcomes included maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max), anaerobic capacity (accumulated O2 deficit), and swimming economy. Significant (P = 0.02 and <0.001 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively) improvements were found in performance on both the 100- [Norm: -0.7 s (95% confidence limits: +0.2 to -1.7 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -0.8 s (95% confidence limits: -0.1 to -1.5 s), -1.1%] and 400-m freestyle [Norm: -3.6 s (-1.8 to -5.5 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -5.3 s (-2.3 to -8.3 s), - 1.7%]. There was no significant difference between groups for either distance (ANOVA interaction, P = 0.91 and 0.36 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively). Vo2 max was improved significantly (Norm: 0.16 ± 0.23 l/min, 6.4 ± 8.1%; Hypo: 0.11 ± 0.18 l/min, 4.2 ± 7.0%). There was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.58). We conclude that 5 wk of high-intensity training in a flume improves sea-level swimming performances and VO2 max in well-trained swimmers, with no additive effect of hypoxic training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)733-743
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume94
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

Oceans and Seas
Analysis of Variance
History
Placebos
Education

Keywords

  • Aerobic capacity
  • Anaerobic capacity
  • Hypoxia
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of high-intensity hypoxic training on sea-level swimming performances. / Truijens, M. J.; Toussaint, H. M.; Dow, J.; Levine, Benjamin D.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 94, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 733-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Truijens, M. J. ; Toussaint, H. M. ; Dow, J. ; Levine, Benjamin D. / Effect of high-intensity hypoxic training on sea-level swimming performances. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003 ; Vol. 94, No. 2. pp. 733-743.
@article{e8a0256d55934b5d9af5913014f08082,
title = "Effect of high-intensity hypoxic training on sea-level swimming performances",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that high-intensity hypoxic training improves sea-level performances more than equivalent training in normoxia. Sixteen well-trained collegiate and Masters swimmers (10 women, 6 men) completed a 5-wk training program, consisting of three high-intensity training sessions in a flume and supplemental low- or moderate-intensity sessions in a pool each week. Subjects were matched for gender, performance level, and training history, and they were assigned to either hypoxic [Hypo; inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) = 15.3{\%}, equivalent to a simulated altitude of 2,500 m] or normoxic (Norm; FIO2 = 20.9{\%}) interval training in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. All pool training occurred under Norm conditions. The primary performance measures were 100- and 400-m freestyle time trials. Laboratory outcomes included maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max), anaerobic capacity (accumulated O2 deficit), and swimming economy. Significant (P = 0.02 and <0.001 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively) improvements were found in performance on both the 100- [Norm: -0.7 s (95{\%} confidence limits: +0.2 to -1.7 s), -1.2{\%}; Hypo: -0.8 s (95{\%} confidence limits: -0.1 to -1.5 s), -1.1{\%}] and 400-m freestyle [Norm: -3.6 s (-1.8 to -5.5 s), -1.2{\%}; Hypo: -5.3 s (-2.3 to -8.3 s), - 1.7{\%}]. There was no significant difference between groups for either distance (ANOVA interaction, P = 0.91 and 0.36 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively). Vo2 max was improved significantly (Norm: 0.16 ± 0.23 l/min, 6.4 ± 8.1{\%}; Hypo: 0.11 ± 0.18 l/min, 4.2 ± 7.0{\%}). There was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.58). We conclude that 5 wk of high-intensity training in a flume improves sea-level swimming performances and VO2 max in well-trained swimmers, with no additive effect of hypoxic training.",
keywords = "Aerobic capacity, Anaerobic capacity, Hypoxia, Training",
author = "Truijens, {M. J.} and Toussaint, {H. M.} and J. Dow and Levine, {Benjamin D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "733--743",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "0161-7567",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of high-intensity hypoxic training on sea-level swimming performances

AU - Truijens, M. J.

AU - Toussaint, H. M.

AU - Dow, J.

AU - Levine, Benjamin D.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that high-intensity hypoxic training improves sea-level performances more than equivalent training in normoxia. Sixteen well-trained collegiate and Masters swimmers (10 women, 6 men) completed a 5-wk training program, consisting of three high-intensity training sessions in a flume and supplemental low- or moderate-intensity sessions in a pool each week. Subjects were matched for gender, performance level, and training history, and they were assigned to either hypoxic [Hypo; inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) = 15.3%, equivalent to a simulated altitude of 2,500 m] or normoxic (Norm; FIO2 = 20.9%) interval training in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. All pool training occurred under Norm conditions. The primary performance measures were 100- and 400-m freestyle time trials. Laboratory outcomes included maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max), anaerobic capacity (accumulated O2 deficit), and swimming economy. Significant (P = 0.02 and <0.001 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively) improvements were found in performance on both the 100- [Norm: -0.7 s (95% confidence limits: +0.2 to -1.7 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -0.8 s (95% confidence limits: -0.1 to -1.5 s), -1.1%] and 400-m freestyle [Norm: -3.6 s (-1.8 to -5.5 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -5.3 s (-2.3 to -8.3 s), - 1.7%]. There was no significant difference between groups for either distance (ANOVA interaction, P = 0.91 and 0.36 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively). Vo2 max was improved significantly (Norm: 0.16 ± 0.23 l/min, 6.4 ± 8.1%; Hypo: 0.11 ± 0.18 l/min, 4.2 ± 7.0%). There was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.58). We conclude that 5 wk of high-intensity training in a flume improves sea-level swimming performances and VO2 max in well-trained swimmers, with no additive effect of hypoxic training.

AB - The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that high-intensity hypoxic training improves sea-level performances more than equivalent training in normoxia. Sixteen well-trained collegiate and Masters swimmers (10 women, 6 men) completed a 5-wk training program, consisting of three high-intensity training sessions in a flume and supplemental low- or moderate-intensity sessions in a pool each week. Subjects were matched for gender, performance level, and training history, and they were assigned to either hypoxic [Hypo; inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) = 15.3%, equivalent to a simulated altitude of 2,500 m] or normoxic (Norm; FIO2 = 20.9%) interval training in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. All pool training occurred under Norm conditions. The primary performance measures were 100- and 400-m freestyle time trials. Laboratory outcomes included maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max), anaerobic capacity (accumulated O2 deficit), and swimming economy. Significant (P = 0.02 and <0.001 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively) improvements were found in performance on both the 100- [Norm: -0.7 s (95% confidence limits: +0.2 to -1.7 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -0.8 s (95% confidence limits: -0.1 to -1.5 s), -1.1%] and 400-m freestyle [Norm: -3.6 s (-1.8 to -5.5 s), -1.2%; Hypo: -5.3 s (-2.3 to -8.3 s), - 1.7%]. There was no significant difference between groups for either distance (ANOVA interaction, P = 0.91 and 0.36 for 100- and 400-m trials, respectively). Vo2 max was improved significantly (Norm: 0.16 ± 0.23 l/min, 6.4 ± 8.1%; Hypo: 0.11 ± 0.18 l/min, 4.2 ± 7.0%). There was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.58). We conclude that 5 wk of high-intensity training in a flume improves sea-level swimming performances and VO2 max in well-trained swimmers, with no additive effect of hypoxic training.

KW - Aerobic capacity

KW - Anaerobic capacity

KW - Hypoxia

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12244264848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12244264848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12391107

AN - SCOPUS:12244264848

VL - 94

SP - 733

EP - 743

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 0161-7567

IS - 2

ER -