Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography

Thiru M. Annaswamy, Andrew H. Morchower

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Pain during needle electrode examination (NEE) is often poorly tolerated. No previous studies have evaluated the effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain reduction during NEE. Our objective was to determine whether pretreatment with lidocaine iontophoresis mitigates the pain felt during NEE. Design: In this prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the subjects were recruited from among patients scheduled for electromyographic evaluation of the bilateral upper limbs in a hospital-based clinic; they were randomized to receive either lidocaine (4%) or placebo (normal saline) administered through iontophoresis (40 mA/min) to the left opponens pollicis. The right opponens pollicis was untreated. A bilateral opponens pollicis NEE was then performed in standard fashion using a monopolar needle electrode, immediately after which the subjects rated their pain using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale. Results: Fourteen subjects were studied. Paired t tests revealed that iontophoresis significantly decreased pain (untreated side: 6.61 ± 1.96, n = 7; treated side: 4.63 ± 2.90, n = 7; P < 0.05). However, there were no significant side-to-side differences in either group (lidocaine: 7.29 ± 1.56 vs. 5.63 ± 3.12; P = 0.19 and placebo: 5.93 ± 2.19 vs. 3.63 ± 2.48; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Pretreatment with iontophoresis significantly reduced pain during NEE. However, the lack of group differences between lidocaine and saline iontophoresis suggested that the analgesic effect may have been attributable primarily to the iontophoresis modality itself rather than to the medication administered with iontophoresis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)961-968
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Iontophoresis
Electromyography
Lidocaine
Needles
Pain
Electrodes
Placebos
Visual Analog Scale
Upper Extremity
Analgesics

Keywords

  • Double-Blind Study
  • Electromyography
  • Iontophoresis
  • Lidocaine
  • Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography. / Annaswamy, Thiru M.; Morchower, Andrew H.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 90, No. 12, 12.2011, p. 961-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8db6aab85e3a43b69f1d5ba1e51bfa06,
title = "Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography",
abstract = "Objective: Pain during needle electrode examination (NEE) is often poorly tolerated. No previous studies have evaluated the effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain reduction during NEE. Our objective was to determine whether pretreatment with lidocaine iontophoresis mitigates the pain felt during NEE. Design: In this prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the subjects were recruited from among patients scheduled for electromyographic evaluation of the bilateral upper limbs in a hospital-based clinic; they were randomized to receive either lidocaine (4{\%}) or placebo (normal saline) administered through iontophoresis (40 mA/min) to the left opponens pollicis. The right opponens pollicis was untreated. A bilateral opponens pollicis NEE was then performed in standard fashion using a monopolar needle electrode, immediately after which the subjects rated their pain using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale. Results: Fourteen subjects were studied. Paired t tests revealed that iontophoresis significantly decreased pain (untreated side: 6.61 ± 1.96, n = 7; treated side: 4.63 ± 2.90, n = 7; P < 0.05). However, there were no significant side-to-side differences in either group (lidocaine: 7.29 ± 1.56 vs. 5.63 ± 3.12; P = 0.19 and placebo: 5.93 ± 2.19 vs. 3.63 ± 2.48; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Pretreatment with iontophoresis significantly reduced pain during NEE. However, the lack of group differences between lidocaine and saline iontophoresis suggested that the analgesic effect may have been attributable primarily to the iontophoresis modality itself rather than to the medication administered with iontophoresis.",
keywords = "Double-Blind Study, Electromyography, Iontophoresis, Lidocaine, Pain",
author = "Annaswamy, {Thiru M.} and Morchower, {Andrew H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c6d3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "961--968",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography

AU - Annaswamy, Thiru M.

AU - Morchower, Andrew H.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Objective: Pain during needle electrode examination (NEE) is often poorly tolerated. No previous studies have evaluated the effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain reduction during NEE. Our objective was to determine whether pretreatment with lidocaine iontophoresis mitigates the pain felt during NEE. Design: In this prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the subjects were recruited from among patients scheduled for electromyographic evaluation of the bilateral upper limbs in a hospital-based clinic; they were randomized to receive either lidocaine (4%) or placebo (normal saline) administered through iontophoresis (40 mA/min) to the left opponens pollicis. The right opponens pollicis was untreated. A bilateral opponens pollicis NEE was then performed in standard fashion using a monopolar needle electrode, immediately after which the subjects rated their pain using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale. Results: Fourteen subjects were studied. Paired t tests revealed that iontophoresis significantly decreased pain (untreated side: 6.61 ± 1.96, n = 7; treated side: 4.63 ± 2.90, n = 7; P < 0.05). However, there were no significant side-to-side differences in either group (lidocaine: 7.29 ± 1.56 vs. 5.63 ± 3.12; P = 0.19 and placebo: 5.93 ± 2.19 vs. 3.63 ± 2.48; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Pretreatment with iontophoresis significantly reduced pain during NEE. However, the lack of group differences between lidocaine and saline iontophoresis suggested that the analgesic effect may have been attributable primarily to the iontophoresis modality itself rather than to the medication administered with iontophoresis.

AB - Objective: Pain during needle electrode examination (NEE) is often poorly tolerated. No previous studies have evaluated the effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain reduction during NEE. Our objective was to determine whether pretreatment with lidocaine iontophoresis mitigates the pain felt during NEE. Design: In this prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the subjects were recruited from among patients scheduled for electromyographic evaluation of the bilateral upper limbs in a hospital-based clinic; they were randomized to receive either lidocaine (4%) or placebo (normal saline) administered through iontophoresis (40 mA/min) to the left opponens pollicis. The right opponens pollicis was untreated. A bilateral opponens pollicis NEE was then performed in standard fashion using a monopolar needle electrode, immediately after which the subjects rated their pain using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale. Results: Fourteen subjects were studied. Paired t tests revealed that iontophoresis significantly decreased pain (untreated side: 6.61 ± 1.96, n = 7; treated side: 4.63 ± 2.90, n = 7; P < 0.05). However, there were no significant side-to-side differences in either group (lidocaine: 7.29 ± 1.56 vs. 5.63 ± 3.12; P = 0.19 and placebo: 5.93 ± 2.19 vs. 3.63 ± 2.48; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Pretreatment with iontophoresis significantly reduced pain during NEE. However, the lack of group differences between lidocaine and saline iontophoresis suggested that the analgesic effect may have been attributable primarily to the iontophoresis modality itself rather than to the medication administered with iontophoresis.

KW - Double-Blind Study

KW - Electromyography

KW - Iontophoresis

KW - Lidocaine

KW - Pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855161635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855161635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c6d3

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c6d3

M3 - Article

C2 - 22019960

AN - SCOPUS:81855161635

VL - 90

SP - 961

EP - 968

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 12

ER -