Effect of ongoing treatment of amblyopia on surgical outcome in esotropia

David R. Weakley, Daniel R. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Classic teaching recommends completion of amblyopia therapy prior to surgical correction of esotropia. Recent reports, however, suggest that incomplete treatment does not adversely affect surgical outcome. This study assesses the effect of incompletely treated amblyopia on the success rate of bimedial rectus recession in infantile and acquired esotropia. Methods: All patients (n=102) with esotropia undergoing bimedial rectus recession in 1994 who met inclusion criteria were reviewed. Subjects were classified as having infantile; acquired, partially accommodative; or acquired, nonaccommodative esotropia for comparison. Amblyopia was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Surgical success was defined as orthophoria ± 8 prism diopters and was assessed at the second postoperative visit (4 to 6 weeks after surgery). Other variables studied included mean surgical age, preoperative deviation, millimeters of surgery, and amount of follow up. Results: For all patients, surgical success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 84.3% (43/51); mild amblyopia, 81.6% (31/38); and moderate amblyopia, 61.5% (8/13). All patients with severe amblyopia underwent unilateral recess/resect procedures and were excluded. Of the esotropia subgroups, a statistically significant decrease in surgical success was noted only in the infantile esotropia group with moderate amblyopia. For this group, success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 77.1% (27/35); mild amblyopia, 81.0% (17/21); and moderate amblyopia, 16.7% (1/6), P=0.005. Conclusions: Performing corrective surgery on patients with infantile esotropia leads to poorer surgical outcome if moderate amblyopia is present at the time of surgery. Mild amblyopia, however, does not adversely affect surgical outcome in patients with infantile esotropia. Furthermore, the presence of mild or moderate amblyopia does not appear to have an influence on surgical outcome for patients with acquired esotropia. The effect of amblyopia on sensory outcome was not studied as most patients were too young for reliable sensory testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-278
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Volume34
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Fingerprint

Esotropia
Amblyopia
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Effect of ongoing treatment of amblyopia on surgical outcome in esotropia. / Weakley, David R.; Holland, Daniel R.

In: Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Vol. 34, No. 5, 09.1997, p. 275-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34dbfa4a0bc642b687bbf7e061f151ee,
title = "Effect of ongoing treatment of amblyopia on surgical outcome in esotropia",
abstract = "Purpose: Classic teaching recommends completion of amblyopia therapy prior to surgical correction of esotropia. Recent reports, however, suggest that incomplete treatment does not adversely affect surgical outcome. This study assesses the effect of incompletely treated amblyopia on the success rate of bimedial rectus recession in infantile and acquired esotropia. Methods: All patients (n=102) with esotropia undergoing bimedial rectus recession in 1994 who met inclusion criteria were reviewed. Subjects were classified as having infantile; acquired, partially accommodative; or acquired, nonaccommodative esotropia for comparison. Amblyopia was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Surgical success was defined as orthophoria ± 8 prism diopters and was assessed at the second postoperative visit (4 to 6 weeks after surgery). Other variables studied included mean surgical age, preoperative deviation, millimeters of surgery, and amount of follow up. Results: For all patients, surgical success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 84.3{\%} (43/51); mild amblyopia, 81.6{\%} (31/38); and moderate amblyopia, 61.5{\%} (8/13). All patients with severe amblyopia underwent unilateral recess/resect procedures and were excluded. Of the esotropia subgroups, a statistically significant decrease in surgical success was noted only in the infantile esotropia group with moderate amblyopia. For this group, success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 77.1{\%} (27/35); mild amblyopia, 81.0{\%} (17/21); and moderate amblyopia, 16.7{\%} (1/6), P=0.005. Conclusions: Performing corrective surgery on patients with infantile esotropia leads to poorer surgical outcome if moderate amblyopia is present at the time of surgery. Mild amblyopia, however, does not adversely affect surgical outcome in patients with infantile esotropia. Furthermore, the presence of mild or moderate amblyopia does not appear to have an influence on surgical outcome for patients with acquired esotropia. The effect of amblyopia on sensory outcome was not studied as most patients were too young for reliable sensory testing.",
author = "Weakley, {David R.} and Holland, {Daniel R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "275--278",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus",
issn = "0191-3913",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of ongoing treatment of amblyopia on surgical outcome in esotropia

AU - Weakley, David R.

AU - Holland, Daniel R.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Purpose: Classic teaching recommends completion of amblyopia therapy prior to surgical correction of esotropia. Recent reports, however, suggest that incomplete treatment does not adversely affect surgical outcome. This study assesses the effect of incompletely treated amblyopia on the success rate of bimedial rectus recession in infantile and acquired esotropia. Methods: All patients (n=102) with esotropia undergoing bimedial rectus recession in 1994 who met inclusion criteria were reviewed. Subjects were classified as having infantile; acquired, partially accommodative; or acquired, nonaccommodative esotropia for comparison. Amblyopia was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Surgical success was defined as orthophoria ± 8 prism diopters and was assessed at the second postoperative visit (4 to 6 weeks after surgery). Other variables studied included mean surgical age, preoperative deviation, millimeters of surgery, and amount of follow up. Results: For all patients, surgical success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 84.3% (43/51); mild amblyopia, 81.6% (31/38); and moderate amblyopia, 61.5% (8/13). All patients with severe amblyopia underwent unilateral recess/resect procedures and were excluded. Of the esotropia subgroups, a statistically significant decrease in surgical success was noted only in the infantile esotropia group with moderate amblyopia. For this group, success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 77.1% (27/35); mild amblyopia, 81.0% (17/21); and moderate amblyopia, 16.7% (1/6), P=0.005. Conclusions: Performing corrective surgery on patients with infantile esotropia leads to poorer surgical outcome if moderate amblyopia is present at the time of surgery. Mild amblyopia, however, does not adversely affect surgical outcome in patients with infantile esotropia. Furthermore, the presence of mild or moderate amblyopia does not appear to have an influence on surgical outcome for patients with acquired esotropia. The effect of amblyopia on sensory outcome was not studied as most patients were too young for reliable sensory testing.

AB - Purpose: Classic teaching recommends completion of amblyopia therapy prior to surgical correction of esotropia. Recent reports, however, suggest that incomplete treatment does not adversely affect surgical outcome. This study assesses the effect of incompletely treated amblyopia on the success rate of bimedial rectus recession in infantile and acquired esotropia. Methods: All patients (n=102) with esotropia undergoing bimedial rectus recession in 1994 who met inclusion criteria were reviewed. Subjects were classified as having infantile; acquired, partially accommodative; or acquired, nonaccommodative esotropia for comparison. Amblyopia was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Surgical success was defined as orthophoria ± 8 prism diopters and was assessed at the second postoperative visit (4 to 6 weeks after surgery). Other variables studied included mean surgical age, preoperative deviation, millimeters of surgery, and amount of follow up. Results: For all patients, surgical success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 84.3% (43/51); mild amblyopia, 81.6% (31/38); and moderate amblyopia, 61.5% (8/13). All patients with severe amblyopia underwent unilateral recess/resect procedures and were excluded. Of the esotropia subgroups, a statistically significant decrease in surgical success was noted only in the infantile esotropia group with moderate amblyopia. For this group, success rates were as follows: no amblyopia, 77.1% (27/35); mild amblyopia, 81.0% (17/21); and moderate amblyopia, 16.7% (1/6), P=0.005. Conclusions: Performing corrective surgery on patients with infantile esotropia leads to poorer surgical outcome if moderate amblyopia is present at the time of surgery. Mild amblyopia, however, does not adversely affect surgical outcome in patients with infantile esotropia. Furthermore, the presence of mild or moderate amblyopia does not appear to have an influence on surgical outcome for patients with acquired esotropia. The effect of amblyopia on sensory outcome was not studied as most patients were too young for reliable sensory testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842336841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842336841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 275

EP - 278

JO - Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

JF - Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

SN - 0191-3913

IS - 5

ER -