Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin

Brian Winey, Matthew Wagar, Kazuyu Ebe, Richard Popple, Tania Lingos, David Sher, Laurence Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of target trajectory shape on the optimal treatment margin. Methods: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for three spherical targets (3, 5, and 7 cm diameter) simulated in exhalation phases, each with margins of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm to account for motion. The plans were delivered to a stationary 2D ion chamber array, and dose movies were obtained of the delivered doses. The dose movie frames were then displaced to simulate different respiratory traces. Five traces were used: sin2, sin4, sin6, and two patient traces. The optimal margin was defined as the margin for which the dose delivered to 95 of the target was closest to that obtained with no margin or motion. The equivalent uniform dose was also investigated as an alternative cost function. Results: The optimal margin was always smaller than the peak-to-peak motion. When the respiratory trace spent less time in the inhale phases, the optimal margin was consistently smaller than when more time was spent in the inhale phases. The target size and treatment modality also affected the optimal margin. Conclusions: The necessary margin for targets that spend less time in the exhale phase (sin6) is 2-4 mm smaller than for targets that spend equal time in the inhale and exhale phases (sin).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3125-3129
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Motion Pictures
Exhalation
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Radiotherapy
Ions
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • internal margins
  • respiratory motion
  • VMAT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Winey, B., Wagar, M., Ebe, K., Popple, R., Lingos, T., Sher, D., & Court, L. (2011). Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin. Medical Physics, 38(6), 3125-3129. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3592649

Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin. / Winey, Brian; Wagar, Matthew; Ebe, Kazuyu; Popple, Richard; Lingos, Tania; Sher, David; Court, Laurence.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.01.2011, p. 3125-3129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winey, B, Wagar, M, Ebe, K, Popple, R, Lingos, T, Sher, D & Court, L 2011, 'Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin', Medical Physics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3125-3129. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3592649
Winey B, Wagar M, Ebe K, Popple R, Lingos T, Sher D et al. Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin. Medical Physics. 2011 Jan 1;38(6):3125-3129. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3592649
Winey, Brian ; Wagar, Matthew ; Ebe, Kazuyu ; Popple, Richard ; Lingos, Tania ; Sher, David ; Court, Laurence. / Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin. In: Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 3125-3129.
@article{830e8ec8a79d4a22938419f22ce8ca10,
title = "Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the effect of target trajectory shape on the optimal treatment margin. Methods: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for three spherical targets (3, 5, and 7 cm diameter) simulated in exhalation phases, each with margins of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm to account for motion. The plans were delivered to a stationary 2D ion chamber array, and dose movies were obtained of the delivered doses. The dose movie frames were then displaced to simulate different respiratory traces. Five traces were used: sin2, sin4, sin6, and two patient traces. The optimal margin was defined as the margin for which the dose delivered to 95 of the target was closest to that obtained with no margin or motion. The equivalent uniform dose was also investigated as an alternative cost function. Results: The optimal margin was always smaller than the peak-to-peak motion. When the respiratory trace spent less time in the inhale phases, the optimal margin was consistently smaller than when more time was spent in the inhale phases. The target size and treatment modality also affected the optimal margin. Conclusions: The necessary margin for targets that spend less time in the exhale phase (sin6) is 2-4 mm smaller than for targets that spend equal time in the inhale and exhale phases (sin).",
keywords = "IMRT, internal margins, respiratory motion, VMAT",
author = "Brian Winey and Matthew Wagar and Kazuyu Ebe and Richard Popple and Tania Lingos and David Sher and Laurence Court",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3592649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "3125--3129",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of respiratory trace shape on optimal treatment margin

AU - Winey, Brian

AU - Wagar, Matthew

AU - Ebe, Kazuyu

AU - Popple, Richard

AU - Lingos, Tania

AU - Sher, David

AU - Court, Laurence

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of target trajectory shape on the optimal treatment margin. Methods: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for three spherical targets (3, 5, and 7 cm diameter) simulated in exhalation phases, each with margins of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm to account for motion. The plans were delivered to a stationary 2D ion chamber array, and dose movies were obtained of the delivered doses. The dose movie frames were then displaced to simulate different respiratory traces. Five traces were used: sin2, sin4, sin6, and two patient traces. The optimal margin was defined as the margin for which the dose delivered to 95 of the target was closest to that obtained with no margin or motion. The equivalent uniform dose was also investigated as an alternative cost function. Results: The optimal margin was always smaller than the peak-to-peak motion. When the respiratory trace spent less time in the inhale phases, the optimal margin was consistently smaller than when more time was spent in the inhale phases. The target size and treatment modality also affected the optimal margin. Conclusions: The necessary margin for targets that spend less time in the exhale phase (sin6) is 2-4 mm smaller than for targets that spend equal time in the inhale and exhale phases (sin).

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of target trajectory shape on the optimal treatment margin. Methods: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for three spherical targets (3, 5, and 7 cm diameter) simulated in exhalation phases, each with margins of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm to account for motion. The plans were delivered to a stationary 2D ion chamber array, and dose movies were obtained of the delivered doses. The dose movie frames were then displaced to simulate different respiratory traces. Five traces were used: sin2, sin4, sin6, and two patient traces. The optimal margin was defined as the margin for which the dose delivered to 95 of the target was closest to that obtained with no margin or motion. The equivalent uniform dose was also investigated as an alternative cost function. Results: The optimal margin was always smaller than the peak-to-peak motion. When the respiratory trace spent less time in the inhale phases, the optimal margin was consistently smaller than when more time was spent in the inhale phases. The target size and treatment modality also affected the optimal margin. Conclusions: The necessary margin for targets that spend less time in the exhale phase (sin6) is 2-4 mm smaller than for targets that spend equal time in the inhale and exhale phases (sin).

KW - IMRT

KW - internal margins

KW - respiratory motion

KW - VMAT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958812856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958812856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3592649

DO - 10.1118/1.3592649

M3 - Article

C2 - 21815386

AN - SCOPUS:79958812856

VL - 38

SP - 3125

EP - 3129

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -