Effect of soft and semi-rigid ankle braces on kinematic and kinetic changes of the knee and ankle joints after forward and lateral drop landing in healthy young women

Noriaki Maeda, Yukio Urabe, Junpei Sasadai, Shuhei Numano, Hironori Fujishita, Masanori Morikawa, Fan Gao, Toshiki Kobayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle braces are commonly used to protect ankle joints from a sprain by restricting inversion. However, the difference between a soft brace (SB) and a semi-rigid brace (SRB) regarding kinematic and kinetic changes of the lower limb joints after forward and lateral drop landing is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SB and SRB, on kinematic and kinetic changes after each drop landing in healthy young women. METHODS: Ten female adults were assessed for one leg while wearing SB, SRB or non-brace (NB). For assessing kinematic and kinetic changes after drop landing, the participant jumped and landed forward and laterally with one leg on a force platform. Knee and ankle joint angle and moment, peak ground reaction force (pGRF), time to peak GRF (TpGRF), the rate of force development (RFD) and GRF impulse (impulse) were measured. RESULTS: The results indicated that knee flexion angle, TpGRF, RFD, and impulse were significantly different between SRB and NB after forward drop landing. SRB demonstrated significant increases in RFD and decreases in impulse. CONCLUSIONS: Semi rigid brace may be beneficial in providing more restriction to the ankle joint for preventing ankle sprains during landing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-225
Number of pages7
JournalIsokinetics and Exercise Science
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Braces
Ankle Joint
Knee Joint
Biomechanical Phenomena
Ankle
Leg
Sprains and Strains
Ankle Injuries
Lower Extremity
Knee
Joints

Keywords

  • Ankle brace
  • forward and lateral landing
  • kinematic and kinetic change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of soft and semi-rigid ankle braces on kinematic and kinetic changes of the knee and ankle joints after forward and lateral drop landing in healthy young women. / Maeda, Noriaki; Urabe, Yukio; Sasadai, Junpei; Numano, Shuhei; Fujishita, Hironori; Morikawa, Masanori; Gao, Fan; Kobayashi, Toshiki.

In: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.2019, p. 219-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maeda, Noriaki ; Urabe, Yukio ; Sasadai, Junpei ; Numano, Shuhei ; Fujishita, Hironori ; Morikawa, Masanori ; Gao, Fan ; Kobayashi, Toshiki. / Effect of soft and semi-rigid ankle braces on kinematic and kinetic changes of the knee and ankle joints after forward and lateral drop landing in healthy young women. In: Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 219-225.
@article{26792dbedb194d6b95d280dcdd698897,
title = "Effect of soft and semi-rigid ankle braces on kinematic and kinetic changes of the knee and ankle joints after forward and lateral drop landing in healthy young women",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Ankle braces are commonly used to protect ankle joints from a sprain by restricting inversion. However, the difference between a soft brace (SB) and a semi-rigid brace (SRB) regarding kinematic and kinetic changes of the lower limb joints after forward and lateral drop landing is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SB and SRB, on kinematic and kinetic changes after each drop landing in healthy young women. METHODS: Ten female adults were assessed for one leg while wearing SB, SRB or non-brace (NB). For assessing kinematic and kinetic changes after drop landing, the participant jumped and landed forward and laterally with one leg on a force platform. Knee and ankle joint angle and moment, peak ground reaction force (pGRF), time to peak GRF (TpGRF), the rate of force development (RFD) and GRF impulse (impulse) were measured. RESULTS: The results indicated that knee flexion angle, TpGRF, RFD, and impulse were significantly different between SRB and NB after forward drop landing. SRB demonstrated significant increases in RFD and decreases in impulse. CONCLUSIONS: Semi rigid brace may be beneficial in providing more restriction to the ankle joint for preventing ankle sprains during landing.",
keywords = "Ankle brace, forward and lateral landing, kinematic and kinetic change",
author = "Noriaki Maeda and Yukio Urabe and Junpei Sasadai and Shuhei Numano and Hironori Fujishita and Masanori Morikawa and Fan Gao and Toshiki Kobayashi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/IES-192150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "219--225",
journal = "Isokinetics and Exercise Science",
issn = "0959-3020",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of soft and semi-rigid ankle braces on kinematic and kinetic changes of the knee and ankle joints after forward and lateral drop landing in healthy young women

AU - Maeda, Noriaki

AU - Urabe, Yukio

AU - Sasadai, Junpei

AU - Numano, Shuhei

AU - Fujishita, Hironori

AU - Morikawa, Masanori

AU - Gao, Fan

AU - Kobayashi, Toshiki

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Ankle braces are commonly used to protect ankle joints from a sprain by restricting inversion. However, the difference between a soft brace (SB) and a semi-rigid brace (SRB) regarding kinematic and kinetic changes of the lower limb joints after forward and lateral drop landing is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SB and SRB, on kinematic and kinetic changes after each drop landing in healthy young women. METHODS: Ten female adults were assessed for one leg while wearing SB, SRB or non-brace (NB). For assessing kinematic and kinetic changes after drop landing, the participant jumped and landed forward and laterally with one leg on a force platform. Knee and ankle joint angle and moment, peak ground reaction force (pGRF), time to peak GRF (TpGRF), the rate of force development (RFD) and GRF impulse (impulse) were measured. RESULTS: The results indicated that knee flexion angle, TpGRF, RFD, and impulse were significantly different between SRB and NB after forward drop landing. SRB demonstrated significant increases in RFD and decreases in impulse. CONCLUSIONS: Semi rigid brace may be beneficial in providing more restriction to the ankle joint for preventing ankle sprains during landing.

AB - BACKGROUND: Ankle braces are commonly used to protect ankle joints from a sprain by restricting inversion. However, the difference between a soft brace (SB) and a semi-rigid brace (SRB) regarding kinematic and kinetic changes of the lower limb joints after forward and lateral drop landing is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SB and SRB, on kinematic and kinetic changes after each drop landing in healthy young women. METHODS: Ten female adults were assessed for one leg while wearing SB, SRB or non-brace (NB). For assessing kinematic and kinetic changes after drop landing, the participant jumped and landed forward and laterally with one leg on a force platform. Knee and ankle joint angle and moment, peak ground reaction force (pGRF), time to peak GRF (TpGRF), the rate of force development (RFD) and GRF impulse (impulse) were measured. RESULTS: The results indicated that knee flexion angle, TpGRF, RFD, and impulse were significantly different between SRB and NB after forward drop landing. SRB demonstrated significant increases in RFD and decreases in impulse. CONCLUSIONS: Semi rigid brace may be beneficial in providing more restriction to the ankle joint for preventing ankle sprains during landing.

KW - Ankle brace

KW - forward and lateral landing

KW - kinematic and kinetic change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072229784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072229784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/IES-192150

DO - 10.3233/IES-192150

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072229784

VL - 27

SP - 219

EP - 225

JO - Isokinetics and Exercise Science

JF - Isokinetics and Exercise Science

SN - 0959-3020

IS - 3

ER -