Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies

Coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration

Alan H. Appelbaum, Thompson T. Kamba, Ari S. Cohen, Waleed G. Qaisi, Robin H. Amirkhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. We compared the effectiveness and safety of image-guided biopsies done with coaxial guides versus fine-needle aspiration done without coaxial guides. Methods. With the use of hospital computer records and chart reviews, all image-guided biopsies done during a 4-year period at our institution were assessed for adequacy and complications. For each biopsy, the use of a coaxial guide, the site, and the imaging modality were recorded. Adequacy of the biopsy and complications were compiled. Success rates were calculated for conventional and coaxial biopsies and by modality and site. Results. Coaxial technique reduced the number of unsatisfactory biopsies compared with conventional technique in extrathoracic sites. The decrease was statistically significant. No major complications occurred from extrathoracic biopsies with either technique. No difference was found in success rates or complication rates between ultrasound-guided and CT-guided biopsies using coaxial technique. Conclusion. Coaxial technique reduces the number of inadequate biopsies in extrathoracic sites, without a detectable increase in complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-217
Number of pages6
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume95
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Biopsy
Safety
Image-Guided Biopsy
Hospital Records

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies : Coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration. / Appelbaum, Alan H.; Kamba, Thompson T.; Cohen, Ari S.; Qaisi, Waleed G.; Amirkhan, Robin H.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2002, p. 212-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Appelbaum, Alan H. ; Kamba, Thompson T. ; Cohen, Ari S. ; Qaisi, Waleed G. ; Amirkhan, Robin H. / Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies : Coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2002 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 212-217.
@article{e623f07abbcc44438b5e83d419fd2db4,
title = "Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies: Coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration",
abstract = "Background. We compared the effectiveness and safety of image-guided biopsies done with coaxial guides versus fine-needle aspiration done without coaxial guides. Methods. With the use of hospital computer records and chart reviews, all image-guided biopsies done during a 4-year period at our institution were assessed for adequacy and complications. For each biopsy, the use of a coaxial guide, the site, and the imaging modality were recorded. Adequacy of the biopsy and complications were compiled. Success rates were calculated for conventional and coaxial biopsies and by modality and site. Results. Coaxial technique reduced the number of unsatisfactory biopsies compared with conventional technique in extrathoracic sites. The decrease was statistically significant. No major complications occurred from extrathoracic biopsies with either technique. No difference was found in success rates or complication rates between ultrasound-guided and CT-guided biopsies using coaxial technique. Conclusion. Coaxial technique reduces the number of inadequate biopsies in extrathoracic sites, without a detectable increase in complications.",
author = "Appelbaum, {Alan H.} and Kamba, {Thompson T.} and Cohen, {Ari S.} and Qaisi, {Waleed G.} and Amirkhan, {Robin H.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "212--217",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies

T2 - Coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration

AU - Appelbaum, Alan H.

AU - Kamba, Thompson T.

AU - Cohen, Ari S.

AU - Qaisi, Waleed G.

AU - Amirkhan, Robin H.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background. We compared the effectiveness and safety of image-guided biopsies done with coaxial guides versus fine-needle aspiration done without coaxial guides. Methods. With the use of hospital computer records and chart reviews, all image-guided biopsies done during a 4-year period at our institution were assessed for adequacy and complications. For each biopsy, the use of a coaxial guide, the site, and the imaging modality were recorded. Adequacy of the biopsy and complications were compiled. Success rates were calculated for conventional and coaxial biopsies and by modality and site. Results. Coaxial technique reduced the number of unsatisfactory biopsies compared with conventional technique in extrathoracic sites. The decrease was statistically significant. No major complications occurred from extrathoracic biopsies with either technique. No difference was found in success rates or complication rates between ultrasound-guided and CT-guided biopsies using coaxial technique. Conclusion. Coaxial technique reduces the number of inadequate biopsies in extrathoracic sites, without a detectable increase in complications.

AB - Background. We compared the effectiveness and safety of image-guided biopsies done with coaxial guides versus fine-needle aspiration done without coaxial guides. Methods. With the use of hospital computer records and chart reviews, all image-guided biopsies done during a 4-year period at our institution were assessed for adequacy and complications. For each biopsy, the use of a coaxial guide, the site, and the imaging modality were recorded. Adequacy of the biopsy and complications were compiled. Success rates were calculated for conventional and coaxial biopsies and by modality and site. Results. Coaxial technique reduced the number of unsatisfactory biopsies compared with conventional technique in extrathoracic sites. The decrease was statistically significant. No major complications occurred from extrathoracic biopsies with either technique. No difference was found in success rates or complication rates between ultrasound-guided and CT-guided biopsies using coaxial technique. Conclusion. Coaxial technique reduces the number of inadequate biopsies in extrathoracic sites, without a detectable increase in complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036165708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036165708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 212

EP - 217

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 2

ER -