Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics

Ana M. Wintergerst, Gaylord S. Throckmorton, Peter H. Buschang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2 g and 1 g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2 g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-375
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Oral Biology
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Mastication
Hardness
Gingiva
Biomechanical Phenomena
Chewing Gum
Chin
Software
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Bolus hardness
  • Bolus size
  • Chewing cycle kinematics
  • Human
  • Mastication
  • Within-subject variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. / Wintergerst, Ana M.; Throckmorton, Gaylord S.; Buschang, Peter H.

In: Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 53, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 369-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wintergerst, Ana M. ; Throckmorton, Gaylord S. ; Buschang, Peter H. / Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. In: Archives of Oral Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 53, No. 4. pp. 369-375.
@article{3102cd726aae44e082601ddad45f22ee,
title = "Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics",
abstract = "This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2 g and 1 g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2 g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.",
keywords = "Bolus hardness, Bolus size, Chewing cycle kinematics, Human, Mastication, Within-subject variability",
author = "Wintergerst, {Ana M.} and Throckmorton, {Gaylord S.} and Buschang, {Peter H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "369--375",
journal = "Archives of Oral Biology",
issn = "0003-9969",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics

AU - Wintergerst, Ana M.

AU - Throckmorton, Gaylord S.

AU - Buschang, Peter H.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2 g and 1 g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2 g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.

AB - This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2 g and 1 g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2 g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.

KW - Bolus hardness

KW - Bolus size

KW - Chewing cycle kinematics

KW - Human

KW - Mastication

KW - Within-subject variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749160624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749160624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012

DO - 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18093571

AN - SCOPUS:39749160624

VL - 53

SP - 369

EP - 375

JO - Archives of Oral Biology

JF - Archives of Oral Biology

SN - 0003-9969

IS - 4

ER -