Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes

Angelika Stallinger, Volker Wenzel, Horst Wagner-Berger, Andreas Schäfer, Wolfgang G. Voelckel, Sven Augenstein, Volker Dörges, Ahamed H. Idris, Karl H. Lindner, Christoph Hörmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If the airway of a cardiac arrest patient is unprotected, basic life support with low rather than high inspiratory flow rates may reduce stomach inflation. Further, if the inspiratory flow rate is fixed such as with a resuscitator performance may improve; especially when used by less experienced rescuers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of limited flow ventilation on respiratory variables, and lung and stomach volumes, when compared with a bag valve device. After institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained, 20 critical care unit registered nurses volunteered to ventilate a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient with an unprotected airway consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung [with lung compliance, 50 ml/0.098 kPa (50 ml/cmH2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l/s (4 cmH2O/l/s)] oesophagus [lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O)] and simulated stomach. Each volunteer ventilated the model with a self-inflating bag (Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark; max. volume, 1500 ml), and a resuscitator providing limited fixed flow (Oxylator EM 100, CPR Medical devices Inc., Toronto, Canada) for 2 min; study endpoints were measured with 2 pneumotachometers. The self-inflating bag vs. resuscitator resulted in comparable mean±SD mask tidal volumes (945±104 vs. 921±250 ml), significantly (P<0.05) higher peak inspiratory flow rates (111±27 vs. 45±21 l/min), and peak inspiratory pressure (1.2±0.47 vs. 78±0.07 kPa), but significantly shorter inspiratory times (1.1±0.29 vs. 1.6±0.35 s). Lung tidal volumes were comparable (337±120 vs. 309±61 ml), but stomach tidal volumes were significantly (P<0.05) higher (200±95 vs. 140±51 ml) with the self-inflating bag. In conclusion, simulated ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest patient using a resuscitator resulted in decreased peak flow rates and therefore, in decreased peak airway pressures when compared with a self-inflating bag. Limited flow ventilation using the resuscitator decreased stomach inflation, although lung tidal volumes were comparable between groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalResuscitation
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Tidal Volume
Heart Arrest
Ventilation
Stomach
Lung
Economic Inflation
Masks
Pressure
Manikins
Lung Compliance
Equipment and Supplies
Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Airway Resistance
Research Ethics Committees
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Denmark
Critical Care
Informed Consent
Esophagus
Canada

Keywords

  • Bag valve mask
  • Basic life support
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Inspiratory flow rate
  • Peak airway pressure
  • Stomach inflation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes. / Stallinger, Angelika; Wenzel, Volker; Wagner-Berger, Horst; Schäfer, Andreas; Voelckel, Wolfgang G.; Augenstein, Sven; Dörges, Volker; Idris, Ahamed H.; Lindner, Karl H.; Hörmann, Christoph.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2002, p. 167-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stallinger, A, Wenzel, V, Wagner-Berger, H, Schäfer, A, Voelckel, WG, Augenstein, S, Dörges, V, Idris, AH, Lindner, KH & Hörmann, C 2002, 'Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes', Resuscitation, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00110-7
Stallinger, Angelika ; Wenzel, Volker ; Wagner-Berger, Horst ; Schäfer, Andreas ; Voelckel, Wolfgang G. ; Augenstein, Sven ; Dörges, Volker ; Idris, Ahamed H. ; Lindner, Karl H. ; Hörmann, Christoph. / Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes. In: Resuscitation. 2002 ; Vol. 54, No. 2. pp. 167-173.
@article{243799afac314570964a78a33a0d9ca6,
title = "Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes",
abstract = "If the airway of a cardiac arrest patient is unprotected, basic life support with low rather than high inspiratory flow rates may reduce stomach inflation. Further, if the inspiratory flow rate is fixed such as with a resuscitator performance may improve; especially when used by less experienced rescuers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of limited flow ventilation on respiratory variables, and lung and stomach volumes, when compared with a bag valve device. After institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained, 20 critical care unit registered nurses volunteered to ventilate a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient with an unprotected airway consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung [with lung compliance, 50 ml/0.098 kPa (50 ml/cmH2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l/s (4 cmH2O/l/s)] oesophagus [lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O)] and simulated stomach. Each volunteer ventilated the model with a self-inflating bag (Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark; max. volume, 1500 ml), and a resuscitator providing limited fixed flow (Oxylator EM 100, CPR Medical devices Inc., Toronto, Canada) for 2 min; study endpoints were measured with 2 pneumotachometers. The self-inflating bag vs. resuscitator resulted in comparable mean±SD mask tidal volumes (945±104 vs. 921±250 ml), significantly (P<0.05) higher peak inspiratory flow rates (111±27 vs. 45±21 l/min), and peak inspiratory pressure (1.2±0.47 vs. 78±0.07 kPa), but significantly shorter inspiratory times (1.1±0.29 vs. 1.6±0.35 s). Lung tidal volumes were comparable (337±120 vs. 309±61 ml), but stomach tidal volumes were significantly (P<0.05) higher (200±95 vs. 140±51 ml) with the self-inflating bag. In conclusion, simulated ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest patient using a resuscitator resulted in decreased peak flow rates and therefore, in decreased peak airway pressures when compared with a self-inflating bag. Limited flow ventilation using the resuscitator decreased stomach inflation, although lung tidal volumes were comparable between groups.",
keywords = "Bag valve mask, Basic life support, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Inspiratory flow rate, Peak airway pressure, Stomach inflation",
author = "Angelika Stallinger and Volker Wenzel and Horst Wagner-Berger and Andreas Sch{\"a}fer and Voelckel, {Wolfgang G.} and Sven Augenstein and Volker D{\"o}rges and Idris, {Ahamed H.} and Lindner, {Karl H.} and Christoph H{\"o}rmann",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00110-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "167--173",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes

AU - Stallinger, Angelika

AU - Wenzel, Volker

AU - Wagner-Berger, Horst

AU - Schäfer, Andreas

AU - Voelckel, Wolfgang G.

AU - Augenstein, Sven

AU - Dörges, Volker

AU - Idris, Ahamed H.

AU - Lindner, Karl H.

AU - Hörmann, Christoph

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - If the airway of a cardiac arrest patient is unprotected, basic life support with low rather than high inspiratory flow rates may reduce stomach inflation. Further, if the inspiratory flow rate is fixed such as with a resuscitator performance may improve; especially when used by less experienced rescuers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of limited flow ventilation on respiratory variables, and lung and stomach volumes, when compared with a bag valve device. After institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained, 20 critical care unit registered nurses volunteered to ventilate a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient with an unprotected airway consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung [with lung compliance, 50 ml/0.098 kPa (50 ml/cmH2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l/s (4 cmH2O/l/s)] oesophagus [lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O)] and simulated stomach. Each volunteer ventilated the model with a self-inflating bag (Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark; max. volume, 1500 ml), and a resuscitator providing limited fixed flow (Oxylator EM 100, CPR Medical devices Inc., Toronto, Canada) for 2 min; study endpoints were measured with 2 pneumotachometers. The self-inflating bag vs. resuscitator resulted in comparable mean±SD mask tidal volumes (945±104 vs. 921±250 ml), significantly (P<0.05) higher peak inspiratory flow rates (111±27 vs. 45±21 l/min), and peak inspiratory pressure (1.2±0.47 vs. 78±0.07 kPa), but significantly shorter inspiratory times (1.1±0.29 vs. 1.6±0.35 s). Lung tidal volumes were comparable (337±120 vs. 309±61 ml), but stomach tidal volumes were significantly (P<0.05) higher (200±95 vs. 140±51 ml) with the self-inflating bag. In conclusion, simulated ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest patient using a resuscitator resulted in decreased peak flow rates and therefore, in decreased peak airway pressures when compared with a self-inflating bag. Limited flow ventilation using the resuscitator decreased stomach inflation, although lung tidal volumes were comparable between groups.

AB - If the airway of a cardiac arrest patient is unprotected, basic life support with low rather than high inspiratory flow rates may reduce stomach inflation. Further, if the inspiratory flow rate is fixed such as with a resuscitator performance may improve; especially when used by less experienced rescuers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of limited flow ventilation on respiratory variables, and lung and stomach volumes, when compared with a bag valve device. After institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained, 20 critical care unit registered nurses volunteered to ventilate a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient with an unprotected airway consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung [with lung compliance, 50 ml/0.098 kPa (50 ml/cmH2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l/s (4 cmH2O/l/s)] oesophagus [lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O)] and simulated stomach. Each volunteer ventilated the model with a self-inflating bag (Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark; max. volume, 1500 ml), and a resuscitator providing limited fixed flow (Oxylator EM 100, CPR Medical devices Inc., Toronto, Canada) for 2 min; study endpoints were measured with 2 pneumotachometers. The self-inflating bag vs. resuscitator resulted in comparable mean±SD mask tidal volumes (945±104 vs. 921±250 ml), significantly (P<0.05) higher peak inspiratory flow rates (111±27 vs. 45±21 l/min), and peak inspiratory pressure (1.2±0.47 vs. 78±0.07 kPa), but significantly shorter inspiratory times (1.1±0.29 vs. 1.6±0.35 s). Lung tidal volumes were comparable (337±120 vs. 309±61 ml), but stomach tidal volumes were significantly (P<0.05) higher (200±95 vs. 140±51 ml) with the self-inflating bag. In conclusion, simulated ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest patient using a resuscitator resulted in decreased peak flow rates and therefore, in decreased peak airway pressures when compared with a self-inflating bag. Limited flow ventilation using the resuscitator decreased stomach inflation, although lung tidal volumes were comparable between groups.

KW - Bag valve mask

KW - Basic life support

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Inspiratory flow rate

KW - Peak airway pressure

KW - Stomach inflation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036024420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036024420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00110-7

DO - 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00110-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 12161296

AN - SCOPUS:0036024420

VL - 54

SP - 167

EP - 173

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 2

ER -