Effects of different verbal instructions on change of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness in asymptomatic adults and in patients with low back pain

Sharon Wang-Price, Jason Zafereo, Kelli Brizzolara, Lily Sokolowski, Dawn Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Spinal stabilisation exercise has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Due to the isometric nature of spinal stabilisation exercise, manual therapists use various verbal instructions to elicit lumbar multifidus muscle contraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not three verbal instructions would alter muscle thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle differently in asymptomatic individuals and patients with LBP. Methods: Three verbal instructions were selected for this study: (1) swell the muscle underneath the transducer, (2) draw your belly button in towards your spinal column and (3) think about tilting your pelvis but without really doing it. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was determined using parasagittal ultrasound (US) imaging. Measurements of muscle thickness were collected at rest and during verbal instructions from 21 asymptomatic adults and 21 patients with LBP. Percent changes of muscle thickness during contraction and at rest were compared between groups and across verbal instructions. Results: ANOVA results showed no significant interaction for both L4-5 and L5-S1, but a significant main effect of verbal instruction (P = 0.049) at L4-5.Post hoc analysis showed a greater increase with verbal instruction #3 than verbal instruction #2 (P = 0.009). There was no significant main effect of group at either segment. Discussion: The results of the study suggest that both groups responded similarly to the three verbal instructions. Verbal instructions may increase lumbar multifidus muscle thickness by different amounts at L4-5, but by the same amount at L5-S1.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 19 2016

Fingerprint

Paraspinal Muscles
Low Back Pain
Muscles
Exercise
Muscle Contraction
Transducers
Pelvis
Ultrasonography
Analysis of Variance
Spine
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Lumbar multifidus
  • Muscle activation
  • Muscle thickness
  • Ultrasound imaging
  • Verbal instruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effects of different verbal instructions on change of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness in asymptomatic adults and in patients with low back pain. / Wang-Price, Sharon; Zafereo, Jason; Brizzolara, Kelli; Sokolowski, Lily; Turner, Dawn.

In: Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 19.05.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a493304b539047a3962b255c3ad8a051,
title = "Effects of different verbal instructions on change of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness in asymptomatic adults and in patients with low back pain",
abstract = "Background: Spinal stabilisation exercise has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Due to the isometric nature of spinal stabilisation exercise, manual therapists use various verbal instructions to elicit lumbar multifidus muscle contraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not three verbal instructions would alter muscle thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle differently in asymptomatic individuals and patients with LBP. Methods: Three verbal instructions were selected for this study: (1) swell the muscle underneath the transducer, (2) draw your belly button in towards your spinal column and (3) think about tilting your pelvis but without really doing it. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was determined using parasagittal ultrasound (US) imaging. Measurements of muscle thickness were collected at rest and during verbal instructions from 21 asymptomatic adults and 21 patients with LBP. Percent changes of muscle thickness during contraction and at rest were compared between groups and across verbal instructions. Results: ANOVA results showed no significant interaction for both L4-5 and L5-S1, but a significant main effect of verbal instruction (P = 0.049) at L4-5.Post hoc analysis showed a greater increase with verbal instruction #3 than verbal instruction #2 (P = 0.009). There was no significant main effect of group at either segment. Discussion: The results of the study suggest that both groups responded similarly to the three verbal instructions. Verbal instructions may increase lumbar multifidus muscle thickness by different amounts at L4-5, but by the same amount at L5-S1.",
keywords = "Low back pain, Lumbar multifidus, Muscle activation, Muscle thickness, Ultrasound imaging, Verbal instruction",
author = "Sharon Wang-Price and Jason Zafereo and Kelli Brizzolara and Lily Sokolowski and Dawn Turner",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000021",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy",
issn = "1066-9817",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of different verbal instructions on change of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness in asymptomatic adults and in patients with low back pain

AU - Wang-Price, Sharon

AU - Zafereo, Jason

AU - Brizzolara, Kelli

AU - Sokolowski, Lily

AU - Turner, Dawn

PY - 2016/5/19

Y1 - 2016/5/19

N2 - Background: Spinal stabilisation exercise has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Due to the isometric nature of spinal stabilisation exercise, manual therapists use various verbal instructions to elicit lumbar multifidus muscle contraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not three verbal instructions would alter muscle thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle differently in asymptomatic individuals and patients with LBP. Methods: Three verbal instructions were selected for this study: (1) swell the muscle underneath the transducer, (2) draw your belly button in towards your spinal column and (3) think about tilting your pelvis but without really doing it. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was determined using parasagittal ultrasound (US) imaging. Measurements of muscle thickness were collected at rest and during verbal instructions from 21 asymptomatic adults and 21 patients with LBP. Percent changes of muscle thickness during contraction and at rest were compared between groups and across verbal instructions. Results: ANOVA results showed no significant interaction for both L4-5 and L5-S1, but a significant main effect of verbal instruction (P = 0.049) at L4-5.Post hoc analysis showed a greater increase with verbal instruction #3 than verbal instruction #2 (P = 0.009). There was no significant main effect of group at either segment. Discussion: The results of the study suggest that both groups responded similarly to the three verbal instructions. Verbal instructions may increase lumbar multifidus muscle thickness by different amounts at L4-5, but by the same amount at L5-S1.

AB - Background: Spinal stabilisation exercise has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Due to the isometric nature of spinal stabilisation exercise, manual therapists use various verbal instructions to elicit lumbar multifidus muscle contraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not three verbal instructions would alter muscle thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle differently in asymptomatic individuals and patients with LBP. Methods: Three verbal instructions were selected for this study: (1) swell the muscle underneath the transducer, (2) draw your belly button in towards your spinal column and (3) think about tilting your pelvis but without really doing it. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was determined using parasagittal ultrasound (US) imaging. Measurements of muscle thickness were collected at rest and during verbal instructions from 21 asymptomatic adults and 21 patients with LBP. Percent changes of muscle thickness during contraction and at rest were compared between groups and across verbal instructions. Results: ANOVA results showed no significant interaction for both L4-5 and L5-S1, but a significant main effect of verbal instruction (P = 0.049) at L4-5.Post hoc analysis showed a greater increase with verbal instruction #3 than verbal instruction #2 (P = 0.009). There was no significant main effect of group at either segment. Discussion: The results of the study suggest that both groups responded similarly to the three verbal instructions. Verbal instructions may increase lumbar multifidus muscle thickness by different amounts at L4-5, but by the same amount at L5-S1.

KW - Low back pain

KW - Lumbar multifidus

KW - Muscle activation

KW - Muscle thickness

KW - Ultrasound imaging

KW - Verbal instruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978488456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978488456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000021

DO - 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000021

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy

JF - Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy

SN - 1066-9817

ER -