Efficacy of a screening procedure to identify potentially disruptive participants in an immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity

Daniel S. Kirschenbaum, Kristina Pecora Kelly, Julie N. Germann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study examined the efficacy of the red flag screening procedure, an approach used in a largescale immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity (Wellspring Camps). The intention of the red flag screening was to screen out potentially highly disruptive applicants, provide an impetus for additional support when high-risk campers were admitted, and help parents develop appropriate expectations. When compared to non-flagged peers, red-flagged campers who attended camp were expected to be sent home early more frequently. Methods: Wellspring's admissions coordinators 'red-flagged' potential campers whose enrollment forms showed evidence of a history of psychological distress, major medical challenges, and/or developmental delays; a licensed psychologist then determined whether or not to admit the child after talking with the identified applicant, parents, and health care providers. 554 overweight young people attended three Wellspring Camps in the summer of 2007 (445 females, 109 males, mean age = 15.8 years, mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m 2, mean % overweight = 66.7%). Results: 8.7% of applicants were red-flagged (n = 48), and 8% of all of the campers (n = 44) were dismissed prematurely. As expected, a much higher percentage of red-flagged campers who were admitted to camp were dismissed prematurely (31,3% of the red-flagged campers) than were non-flagged campers (5,1%; p < 0.0005). Conclusion: These findings support the efficacy of Wellspring's red flag screening procedure. While further improvements can be made, such a tool may be useful to other immersion programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-115
Number of pages6
JournalObesity Facts
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Pediatric Obesity
Immersion
applicant
adolescent
parents
Parents
Psychology
psychologist
Health Personnel
Therapeutics
health care
history
evidence

Keywords

  • Behavior problems
  • Immersion program
  • Obesity
  • Weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Efficacy of a screening procedure to identify potentially disruptive participants in an immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity. / Kirschenbaum, Daniel S.; Pecora Kelly, Kristina; Germann, Julie N.

In: Obesity Facts, Vol. 2, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 110-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f964a3c719924bc5973d1cdaae809660,
title = "Efficacy of a screening procedure to identify potentially disruptive participants in an immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity",
abstract = "Background: This study examined the efficacy of the red flag screening procedure, an approach used in a largescale immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity (Wellspring Camps). The intention of the red flag screening was to screen out potentially highly disruptive applicants, provide an impetus for additional support when high-risk campers were admitted, and help parents develop appropriate expectations. When compared to non-flagged peers, red-flagged campers who attended camp were expected to be sent home early more frequently. Methods: Wellspring's admissions coordinators 'red-flagged' potential campers whose enrollment forms showed evidence of a history of psychological distress, major medical challenges, and/or developmental delays; a licensed psychologist then determined whether or not to admit the child after talking with the identified applicant, parents, and health care providers. 554 overweight young people attended three Wellspring Camps in the summer of 2007 (445 females, 109 males, mean age = 15.8 years, mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m 2, mean {\%} overweight = 66.7{\%}). Results: 8.7{\%} of applicants were red-flagged (n = 48), and 8{\%} of all of the campers (n = 44) were dismissed prematurely. As expected, a much higher percentage of red-flagged campers who were admitted to camp were dismissed prematurely (31,3{\%} of the red-flagged campers) than were non-flagged campers (5,1{\%}; p < 0.0005). Conclusion: These findings support the efficacy of Wellspring's red flag screening procedure. While further improvements can be made, such a tool may be useful to other immersion programs.",
keywords = "Behavior problems, Immersion program, Obesity, Weight loss",
author = "Kirschenbaum, {Daniel S.} and {Pecora Kelly}, Kristina and Germann, {Julie N.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1159/000210258",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "110--115",
journal = "Obesity Facts",
issn = "1662-4025",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of a screening procedure to identify potentially disruptive participants in an immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity

AU - Kirschenbaum, Daniel S.

AU - Pecora Kelly, Kristina

AU - Germann, Julie N.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Background: This study examined the efficacy of the red flag screening procedure, an approach used in a largescale immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity (Wellspring Camps). The intention of the red flag screening was to screen out potentially highly disruptive applicants, provide an impetus for additional support when high-risk campers were admitted, and help parents develop appropriate expectations. When compared to non-flagged peers, red-flagged campers who attended camp were expected to be sent home early more frequently. Methods: Wellspring's admissions coordinators 'red-flagged' potential campers whose enrollment forms showed evidence of a history of psychological distress, major medical challenges, and/or developmental delays; a licensed psychologist then determined whether or not to admit the child after talking with the identified applicant, parents, and health care providers. 554 overweight young people attended three Wellspring Camps in the summer of 2007 (445 females, 109 males, mean age = 15.8 years, mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m 2, mean % overweight = 66.7%). Results: 8.7% of applicants were red-flagged (n = 48), and 8% of all of the campers (n = 44) were dismissed prematurely. As expected, a much higher percentage of red-flagged campers who were admitted to camp were dismissed prematurely (31,3% of the red-flagged campers) than were non-flagged campers (5,1%; p < 0.0005). Conclusion: These findings support the efficacy of Wellspring's red flag screening procedure. While further improvements can be made, such a tool may be useful to other immersion programs.

AB - Background: This study examined the efficacy of the red flag screening procedure, an approach used in a largescale immersion program for the treatment of adolescent obesity (Wellspring Camps). The intention of the red flag screening was to screen out potentially highly disruptive applicants, provide an impetus for additional support when high-risk campers were admitted, and help parents develop appropriate expectations. When compared to non-flagged peers, red-flagged campers who attended camp were expected to be sent home early more frequently. Methods: Wellspring's admissions coordinators 'red-flagged' potential campers whose enrollment forms showed evidence of a history of psychological distress, major medical challenges, and/or developmental delays; a licensed psychologist then determined whether or not to admit the child after talking with the identified applicant, parents, and health care providers. 554 overweight young people attended three Wellspring Camps in the summer of 2007 (445 females, 109 males, mean age = 15.8 years, mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m 2, mean % overweight = 66.7%). Results: 8.7% of applicants were red-flagged (n = 48), and 8% of all of the campers (n = 44) were dismissed prematurely. As expected, a much higher percentage of red-flagged campers who were admitted to camp were dismissed prematurely (31,3% of the red-flagged campers) than were non-flagged campers (5,1%; p < 0.0005). Conclusion: These findings support the efficacy of Wellspring's red flag screening procedure. While further improvements can be made, such a tool may be useful to other immersion programs.

KW - Behavior problems

KW - Immersion program

KW - Obesity

KW - Weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649210505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649210505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000210258

DO - 10.1159/000210258

M3 - Article

C2 - 20054214

AN - SCOPUS:67649210505

VL - 2

SP - 110

EP - 115

JO - Obesity Facts

JF - Obesity Facts

SN - 1662-4025

IS - 2

ER -