Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma

C. B. Ross, K. W. Sharp, A. J. Kaufman, T. Andrews, L. F. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasing use of nonoperative methods for the diagnosis and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer has placed greater emphasis on computerized tomography (CT) in staging of this malignancy. The present study was done to review our experience with CT in staging pancreatic cancer, specifically its efficacy in predicting lesions amenable to curative versus noncurative surgical treatment. Sixty six consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who were considered potential candidates for surgical resection and who had preoperative CT scans over the 4-year period from 1982 through 1986 were studied. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist without knowledge of patients' surgical management. CT criteria for unresectable disease include hepatic and distant metastasis as well as evidence of locally advanced disease, including peripancreatic fascial extension, extension of tumor to locally contiguous structures, vascular encasement/invasion, and local lymphadenopathy. CT predicted resectability with a sensitivity of 75 per cent and a positive predictive value of 38 per cent. Unresectability was predicted with a senstivity of 72 per cent and positive predictive value of 93 per cent. CT incorrectly predicted unresectable disease in three patients who had a curative resection. CT was most reliable when it predicted unresectability due to the presence of hepatic and/or distant metastasis. CT predicted unresectability with least sensitivity using criteria for locally advanced disease. Therapeutic decisions for nonoperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer based upon CT predictions of unresectable disease, especially predictions of unresectability solely on the basis of locally advanced disease, can not be recommended at this time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-226
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume54
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Tomography
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreatic Carcinoma
Neoplasm Metastasis
Liver
Palliative Care
Blood Vessels
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Ross, C. B., Sharp, K. W., Kaufman, A. J., Andrews, T., & Williams, L. F. (1988). Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma. American Surgeon, 54(4), 221-226.

Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma. / Ross, C. B.; Sharp, K. W.; Kaufman, A. J.; Andrews, T.; Williams, L. F.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1988, p. 221-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ross, CB, Sharp, KW, Kaufman, AJ, Andrews, T & Williams, LF 1988, 'Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma', American Surgeon, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 221-226.
Ross CB, Sharp KW, Kaufman AJ, Andrews T, Williams LF. Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma. American Surgeon. 1988;54(4):221-226.
Ross, C. B. ; Sharp, K. W. ; Kaufman, A. J. ; Andrews, T. ; Williams, L. F. / Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma. In: American Surgeon. 1988 ; Vol. 54, No. 4. pp. 221-226.
@article{b42c4ce208154f71a60879b670ac9e3b,
title = "Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma",
abstract = "The increasing use of nonoperative methods for the diagnosis and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer has placed greater emphasis on computerized tomography (CT) in staging of this malignancy. The present study was done to review our experience with CT in staging pancreatic cancer, specifically its efficacy in predicting lesions amenable to curative versus noncurative surgical treatment. Sixty six consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who were considered potential candidates for surgical resection and who had preoperative CT scans over the 4-year period from 1982 through 1986 were studied. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist without knowledge of patients' surgical management. CT criteria for unresectable disease include hepatic and distant metastasis as well as evidence of locally advanced disease, including peripancreatic fascial extension, extension of tumor to locally contiguous structures, vascular encasement/invasion, and local lymphadenopathy. CT predicted resectability with a sensitivity of 75 per cent and a positive predictive value of 38 per cent. Unresectability was predicted with a senstivity of 72 per cent and positive predictive value of 93 per cent. CT incorrectly predicted unresectable disease in three patients who had a curative resection. CT was most reliable when it predicted unresectability due to the presence of hepatic and/or distant metastasis. CT predicted unresectability with least sensitivity using criteria for locally advanced disease. Therapeutic decisions for nonoperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer based upon CT predictions of unresectable disease, especially predictions of unresectability solely on the basis of locally advanced disease, can not be recommended at this time.",
author = "Ross, {C. B.} and Sharp, {K. W.} and Kaufman, {A. J.} and T. Andrews and Williams, {L. F.}",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "221--226",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma

AU - Ross, C. B.

AU - Sharp, K. W.

AU - Kaufman, A. J.

AU - Andrews, T.

AU - Williams, L. F.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - The increasing use of nonoperative methods for the diagnosis and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer has placed greater emphasis on computerized tomography (CT) in staging of this malignancy. The present study was done to review our experience with CT in staging pancreatic cancer, specifically its efficacy in predicting lesions amenable to curative versus noncurative surgical treatment. Sixty six consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who were considered potential candidates for surgical resection and who had preoperative CT scans over the 4-year period from 1982 through 1986 were studied. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist without knowledge of patients' surgical management. CT criteria for unresectable disease include hepatic and distant metastasis as well as evidence of locally advanced disease, including peripancreatic fascial extension, extension of tumor to locally contiguous structures, vascular encasement/invasion, and local lymphadenopathy. CT predicted resectability with a sensitivity of 75 per cent and a positive predictive value of 38 per cent. Unresectability was predicted with a senstivity of 72 per cent and positive predictive value of 93 per cent. CT incorrectly predicted unresectable disease in three patients who had a curative resection. CT was most reliable when it predicted unresectability due to the presence of hepatic and/or distant metastasis. CT predicted unresectability with least sensitivity using criteria for locally advanced disease. Therapeutic decisions for nonoperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer based upon CT predictions of unresectable disease, especially predictions of unresectability solely on the basis of locally advanced disease, can not be recommended at this time.

AB - The increasing use of nonoperative methods for the diagnosis and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer has placed greater emphasis on computerized tomography (CT) in staging of this malignancy. The present study was done to review our experience with CT in staging pancreatic cancer, specifically its efficacy in predicting lesions amenable to curative versus noncurative surgical treatment. Sixty six consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who were considered potential candidates for surgical resection and who had preoperative CT scans over the 4-year period from 1982 through 1986 were studied. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist without knowledge of patients' surgical management. CT criteria for unresectable disease include hepatic and distant metastasis as well as evidence of locally advanced disease, including peripancreatic fascial extension, extension of tumor to locally contiguous structures, vascular encasement/invasion, and local lymphadenopathy. CT predicted resectability with a sensitivity of 75 per cent and a positive predictive value of 38 per cent. Unresectability was predicted with a senstivity of 72 per cent and positive predictive value of 93 per cent. CT incorrectly predicted unresectable disease in three patients who had a curative resection. CT was most reliable when it predicted unresectability due to the presence of hepatic and/or distant metastasis. CT predicted unresectability with least sensitivity using criteria for locally advanced disease. Therapeutic decisions for nonoperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer based upon CT predictions of unresectable disease, especially predictions of unresectability solely on the basis of locally advanced disease, can not be recommended at this time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023948773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023948773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 221

EP - 226

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 4

ER -