TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization
AU - Malinowski, Kathleen T.
AU - Noel, Camille
AU - Roy, Meghana
AU - Willoughby, Twyla
AU - Djemi, Toufik
AU - Jani, Shirish
AU - Solberg, Timothy
AU - Liu, David
AU - Levine, Lisa
AU - Parikh, Parag J.
PY - 2008/9/21
Y1 - 2008/9/21
N2 - Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95% of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95% of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.
AB - Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95% of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95% of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51849161363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51849161363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007
DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007
M3 - Article
C2 - 18711242
AN - SCOPUS:51849161363
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 53
SP - 4959
EP - 4970
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 18
ER -