Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization

Kathleen T. Malinowski, Camille Noel, Meghana Roy, Twyla Willoughby, Toufik Djemi, Shirish Jani, Timothy Solberg, David Liu, Lisa Levine, Parag J. Parikh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95% of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95% of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4959-4970
Number of pages12
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume53
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 21 2008

Fingerprint

Prostate
couches
Radiation
margins
Oncology
Planning
Therapeutics
rooms
Moving and Lifting Patients
radiation
planning
Prostatic Neoplasms
delivery
cancer
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Malinowski, K. T., Noel, C., Roy, M., Willoughby, T., Djemi, T., Jani, S., ... Parikh, P. J. (2008). Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 53(18), 4959-4970. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007

Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization. / Malinowski, Kathleen T.; Noel, Camille; Roy, Meghana; Willoughby, Twyla; Djemi, Toufik; Jani, Shirish; Solberg, Timothy; Liu, David; Levine, Lisa; Parikh, Parag J.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 53, No. 18, 21.09.2008, p. 4959-4970.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malinowski, KT, Noel, C, Roy, M, Willoughby, T, Djemi, T, Jani, S, Solberg, T, Liu, D, Levine, L & Parikh, PJ 2008, 'Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization', Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 53, no. 18, pp. 4959-4970. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007
Malinowski KT, Noel C, Roy M, Willoughby T, Djemi T, Jani S et al. Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2008 Sep 21;53(18):4959-4970. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007
Malinowski, Kathleen T. ; Noel, Camille ; Roy, Meghana ; Willoughby, Twyla ; Djemi, Toufik ; Jani, Shirish ; Solberg, Timothy ; Liu, David ; Levine, Lisa ; Parikh, Parag J. / Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 53, No. 18. pp. 4959-4970.
@article{e469922e46a242179253416b33466ca8,
title = "Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization",
abstract = "Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95{\%} of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95{\%} of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.",
author = "Malinowski, {Kathleen T.} and Camille Noel and Meghana Roy and Twyla Willoughby and Toufik Djemi and Shirish Jani and Timothy Solberg and David Liu and Lisa Levine and Parikh, {Parag J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "4959--4970",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization

AU - Malinowski, Kathleen T.

AU - Noel, Camille

AU - Roy, Meghana

AU - Willoughby, Twyla

AU - Djemi, Toufik

AU - Jani, Shirish

AU - Solberg, Timothy

AU - Liu, David

AU - Levine, Lisa

AU - Parikh, Parag J.

PY - 2008/9/21

Y1 - 2008/9/21

N2 - Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95% of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95% of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.

AB - Recent technological advances make it possible to monitor prostate movement during radiation delivery. Using previously published data from 35 patients who underwent continuous localization during prostate cancer treatment, we simulated various interventions to identify the radiation-gating and patient-repositioning strategies that least prolonged the time to complete the daily treatment. Acceptable response protocols were those that resulted in at least 95% of patients' prostates remaining within the planning margins at least 95% of the time. Gating and repositioning were not necessary for margins of 7 or 10 mm because of the rarity of excursions at these margins. However, intervention was routinely necessary for margins of 3 and 5 mm. In simulated interventions for which the therapist could reposition the treatment couch without entering the room, the most time-efficient response protocol was to reposition the couch immediately after the prostate position was outside the treatment margins. In simulations in which the therapist had to enter the room to reposition the couch, overall treatment time could be reduced and accuracy could be increased by manually gating treatment for 11 and 21 s for 3- and 5-mm margins, respectively, before interrupting treatment to reposition the treatment couch.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51849161363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51849161363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/007

M3 - Article

C2 - 18711242

AN - SCOPUS:51849161363

VL - 53

SP - 4959

EP - 4970

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 18

ER -