Emergency brain resuscitation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past efforts to reverse or limit the effects of acute stroke have been largely unsuccessful, in part because of the inability to evaluate and treat most patients soon after stroke onset. One important factor in the delay of treatment has been the nihilistic attitude of medical personnel, including physicians, toward the need to rapidly evaluate and treat patients with stroke. This is important for non-neurologists because most patients with stroke are cared for by internists, family physicians, and emergency physicians. We present the concept of emergency brain resuscitation as one method of galvanizing and motivating health professionals to take a more proactive and aggressive approach to treating the patient with acute stroke. Laboratory and clinical data support the potential efficacy of emergency brain resuscitation teams, which will use standard and experimental techniques to treat patients with stroke. A cost-benefit analysis suggests that emergency brain resuscitation may lower the costs associated with stroke by reducing length of hospital stay, disability, and lost wages. The formation of pilot programs is a logical first step toward evaluating and refining this concept.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-627
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume122
Issue number8
StatePublished - Apr 15 1995

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Emergencies
Stroke
Brain
Length of Stay
Physicians
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Family Physicians
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Emergency brain resuscitation. / Alberts, Mark J.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 122, No. 8, 15.04.1995, p. 622-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1818b9cb5864335a405d1aa7ee7ed9e,
title = "Emergency brain resuscitation",
abstract = "Past efforts to reverse or limit the effects of acute stroke have been largely unsuccessful, in part because of the inability to evaluate and treat most patients soon after stroke onset. One important factor in the delay of treatment has been the nihilistic attitude of medical personnel, including physicians, toward the need to rapidly evaluate and treat patients with stroke. This is important for non-neurologists because most patients with stroke are cared for by internists, family physicians, and emergency physicians. We present the concept of emergency brain resuscitation as one method of galvanizing and motivating health professionals to take a more proactive and aggressive approach to treating the patient with acute stroke. Laboratory and clinical data support the potential efficacy of emergency brain resuscitation teams, which will use standard and experimental techniques to treat patients with stroke. A cost-benefit analysis suggests that emergency brain resuscitation may lower the costs associated with stroke by reducing length of hospital stay, disability, and lost wages. The formation of pilot programs is a logical first step toward evaluating and refining this concept.",
author = "Alberts, {Mark J.}",
year = "1995",
month = "4",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "622--627",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency brain resuscitation

AU - Alberts, Mark J.

PY - 1995/4/15

Y1 - 1995/4/15

N2 - Past efforts to reverse or limit the effects of acute stroke have been largely unsuccessful, in part because of the inability to evaluate and treat most patients soon after stroke onset. One important factor in the delay of treatment has been the nihilistic attitude of medical personnel, including physicians, toward the need to rapidly evaluate and treat patients with stroke. This is important for non-neurologists because most patients with stroke are cared for by internists, family physicians, and emergency physicians. We present the concept of emergency brain resuscitation as one method of galvanizing and motivating health professionals to take a more proactive and aggressive approach to treating the patient with acute stroke. Laboratory and clinical data support the potential efficacy of emergency brain resuscitation teams, which will use standard and experimental techniques to treat patients with stroke. A cost-benefit analysis suggests that emergency brain resuscitation may lower the costs associated with stroke by reducing length of hospital stay, disability, and lost wages. The formation of pilot programs is a logical first step toward evaluating and refining this concept.

AB - Past efforts to reverse or limit the effects of acute stroke have been largely unsuccessful, in part because of the inability to evaluate and treat most patients soon after stroke onset. One important factor in the delay of treatment has been the nihilistic attitude of medical personnel, including physicians, toward the need to rapidly evaluate and treat patients with stroke. This is important for non-neurologists because most patients with stroke are cared for by internists, family physicians, and emergency physicians. We present the concept of emergency brain resuscitation as one method of galvanizing and motivating health professionals to take a more proactive and aggressive approach to treating the patient with acute stroke. Laboratory and clinical data support the potential efficacy of emergency brain resuscitation teams, which will use standard and experimental techniques to treat patients with stroke. A cost-benefit analysis suggests that emergency brain resuscitation may lower the costs associated with stroke by reducing length of hospital stay, disability, and lost wages. The formation of pilot programs is a logical first step toward evaluating and refining this concept.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028939767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028939767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7887560

AN - SCOPUS:0028939767

VL - 122

SP - 622

EP - 627

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 8

ER -