Emergency ECT in an incapacitated, medically compromised patient with Huntington's disease

Michelle Magid, Kenneth Trevino, William H. Reid, Sheila Jalalat, Mustafa M. Husain, David A. Kahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is infrequently considered an "emergency" medical procedure; however, there are certain conditions in which there is considerable urgency to initiate ECT. For example, prompt administration of ECT to treat neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant catatonia is necessary to improve a patient's overall prognosis and potentially save the patient's life. In this case, a 57-year-old woman with Huntington's disease was admitted to our medical intensive care unit for failure to thrive due to severe psychotic symptoms. Prior to her admission, the patient had become increasingly psychotic and agitated, resulting in her refusal and/or inability to eat. Efforts to treat her severe psychiatric and behavioral symptoms with various psychopharmacological strategies were largely unsuccessful. As the patient's physical health continued to decline, with loss of approximately 35 pounds over 2 months, her family began making arrangements to transfer her to a hospice facility. The day before she was to be transferred, the psychiatry consultation-liaison service recommended ECT. Unfortunately, this recommendation was complicated because the patient was unable to provide consent. This case report describes the legal and administrative process used to ethically and legally administer ECT without consent from the patient or a court-appointed guardian in order to treat a life-threatening condition. To the best of our knowledge, this report documents the first time ECT has been granted "medical emergency" status in Texas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-475
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Practice
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 8 2014

Fingerprint

Electroconvulsive Therapy
Emergency Treatment
Huntington Disease
Psychiatry
Emergencies
Catatonia
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Failure to Thrive
Behavioral Symptoms
Hospices
Patient Admission
Intensive Care Units
Referral and Consultation
Health

Keywords

  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • Emergency medical services
  • Government regulation
  • Huntington's disease
  • Informed consent
  • Jurisprudence
  • Mental competency
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Emergency ECT in an incapacitated, medically compromised patient with Huntington's disease. / Magid, Michelle; Trevino, Kenneth; Reid, William H.; Jalalat, Sheila; Husain, Mustafa M.; Kahn, David A.

In: Journal of Psychiatric Practice, Vol. 20, No. 6, 08.11.2014, p. 470-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magid, Michelle ; Trevino, Kenneth ; Reid, William H. ; Jalalat, Sheila ; Husain, Mustafa M. ; Kahn, David A. / Emergency ECT in an incapacitated, medically compromised patient with Huntington's disease. In: Journal of Psychiatric Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 470-475.
@article{6bda7e3a5618465aaea0f83bc12d0839,
title = "Emergency ECT in an incapacitated, medically compromised patient with Huntington's disease",
abstract = "Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is infrequently considered an {"}emergency{"} medical procedure; however, there are certain conditions in which there is considerable urgency to initiate ECT. For example, prompt administration of ECT to treat neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant catatonia is necessary to improve a patient's overall prognosis and potentially save the patient's life. In this case, a 57-year-old woman with Huntington's disease was admitted to our medical intensive care unit for failure to thrive due to severe psychotic symptoms. Prior to her admission, the patient had become increasingly psychotic and agitated, resulting in her refusal and/or inability to eat. Efforts to treat her severe psychiatric and behavioral symptoms with various psychopharmacological strategies were largely unsuccessful. As the patient's physical health continued to decline, with loss of approximately 35 pounds over 2 months, her family began making arrangements to transfer her to a hospice facility. The day before she was to be transferred, the psychiatry consultation-liaison service recommended ECT. Unfortunately, this recommendation was complicated because the patient was unable to provide consent. This case report describes the legal and administrative process used to ethically and legally administer ECT without consent from the patient or a court-appointed guardian in order to treat a life-threatening condition. To the best of our knowledge, this report documents the first time ECT has been granted {"}medical emergency{"} status in Texas.",
keywords = "Electroconvulsive therapy, Emergency medical services, Government regulation, Huntington's disease, Informed consent, Jurisprudence, Mental competency, Treatment outcome",
author = "Michelle Magid and Kenneth Trevino and Reid, {William H.} and Sheila Jalalat and Husain, {Mustafa M.} and Kahn, {David A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1097/01.pra.0000456596.43492.48",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "470--475",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Practice",
issn = "1527-4160",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency ECT in an incapacitated, medically compromised patient with Huntington's disease

AU - Magid, Michelle

AU - Trevino, Kenneth

AU - Reid, William H.

AU - Jalalat, Sheila

AU - Husain, Mustafa M.

AU - Kahn, David A.

PY - 2014/11/8

Y1 - 2014/11/8

N2 - Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is infrequently considered an "emergency" medical procedure; however, there are certain conditions in which there is considerable urgency to initiate ECT. For example, prompt administration of ECT to treat neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant catatonia is necessary to improve a patient's overall prognosis and potentially save the patient's life. In this case, a 57-year-old woman with Huntington's disease was admitted to our medical intensive care unit for failure to thrive due to severe psychotic symptoms. Prior to her admission, the patient had become increasingly psychotic and agitated, resulting in her refusal and/or inability to eat. Efforts to treat her severe psychiatric and behavioral symptoms with various psychopharmacological strategies were largely unsuccessful. As the patient's physical health continued to decline, with loss of approximately 35 pounds over 2 months, her family began making arrangements to transfer her to a hospice facility. The day before she was to be transferred, the psychiatry consultation-liaison service recommended ECT. Unfortunately, this recommendation was complicated because the patient was unable to provide consent. This case report describes the legal and administrative process used to ethically and legally administer ECT without consent from the patient or a court-appointed guardian in order to treat a life-threatening condition. To the best of our knowledge, this report documents the first time ECT has been granted "medical emergency" status in Texas.

AB - Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is infrequently considered an "emergency" medical procedure; however, there are certain conditions in which there is considerable urgency to initiate ECT. For example, prompt administration of ECT to treat neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant catatonia is necessary to improve a patient's overall prognosis and potentially save the patient's life. In this case, a 57-year-old woman with Huntington's disease was admitted to our medical intensive care unit for failure to thrive due to severe psychotic symptoms. Prior to her admission, the patient had become increasingly psychotic and agitated, resulting in her refusal and/or inability to eat. Efforts to treat her severe psychiatric and behavioral symptoms with various psychopharmacological strategies were largely unsuccessful. As the patient's physical health continued to decline, with loss of approximately 35 pounds over 2 months, her family began making arrangements to transfer her to a hospice facility. The day before she was to be transferred, the psychiatry consultation-liaison service recommended ECT. Unfortunately, this recommendation was complicated because the patient was unable to provide consent. This case report describes the legal and administrative process used to ethically and legally administer ECT without consent from the patient or a court-appointed guardian in order to treat a life-threatening condition. To the best of our knowledge, this report documents the first time ECT has been granted "medical emergency" status in Texas.

KW - Electroconvulsive therapy

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Government regulation

KW - Huntington's disease

KW - Informed consent

KW - Jurisprudence

KW - Mental competency

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915805781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84915805781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pra.0000456596.43492.48

DO - 10.1097/01.pra.0000456596.43492.48

M3 - Article

C2 - 25406052

AN - SCOPUS:84915805781

VL - 20

SP - 470

EP - 475

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

SN - 1527-4160

IS - 6

ER -