Emergency medical services priority dispatch

Peter A. Curka, Paul E. Pepe, Victoria F. Ginger, Robert C. Sherrard, Michael V. Ivy, Brian S. Zachariah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: To test the ability of a locally designed priority dispatch system to safely exclude the need for advanced life support (ALS). Design: Retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) incident records to determine how often the lone dispatch of basic life support (BLS) units, staffed with basic emergency medical technicians, subsequently required or involved ALS care. Setting: A large centralized municipal EMS system with a tiered ALS/BLS ambulance response. All BLS units carry automated defibrillators. Measurements: Consecutive EMS records (35,075) were reviewed by computerized search for ALS procedures. Records indicating ALS procedures were tabulated and then manually reviewed for the nature of and probable indication for the ALS intervention. Intervention: Brief sequences of computer-stored questions that help dispatchers identify (or exclude) signs and symptoms indicating the need for ALS. Results: The dispatch triage system spared ALS units from initial dispatch in 14,100 of the EMS incidents (40.2%), increasing their availability and use for more serious calls. Among these 14,100 cases, only 41 patients (0.3%) later received drugs such as nitroglycerin and naloxone; another 27 patients (0.2%) received resuscitative interventions such as epinephrine or defibrillation. Furthermore, on closer analysis, the immediate presence of a paramedic might have provided a true potential for advantage in outcome for only five or six patients (less than 0.04 of the 14,100 BLS dispatches). Meanwhile, many important operational, fiscal, and cost-effective patient care benefits were realized with this system. Conclusion: A computer-aided dispatch triage algorithm can facilitate improvements in both EMS system operations and prehospital patient care by safely and reliably identifying EMS incidents requiring only BLS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1688-1695
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Triage
Patient Care
Emergency Medical Technicians
Life Support Care
Allied Health Personnel
Ambulances
Defibrillators
Nitroglycerin
Naloxone
Epinephrine
Signs and Symptoms
Medical Records
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • ALS
  • ambulance dispatch
  • emergency medical services
  • prehospital care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Curka, P. A., Pepe, P. E., Ginger, V. F., Sherrard, R. C., Ivy, M. V., & Zachariah, B. S. (1993). Emergency medical services priority dispatch. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 22(11), 1688-1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81307-1

Emergency medical services priority dispatch. / Curka, Peter A.; Pepe, Paul E.; Ginger, Victoria F.; Sherrard, Robert C.; Ivy, Michael V.; Zachariah, Brian S.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1993, p. 1688-1695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curka, PA, Pepe, PE, Ginger, VF, Sherrard, RC, Ivy, MV & Zachariah, BS 1993, 'Emergency medical services priority dispatch', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1688-1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81307-1
Curka, Peter A. ; Pepe, Paul E. ; Ginger, Victoria F. ; Sherrard, Robert C. ; Ivy, Michael V. ; Zachariah, Brian S. / Emergency medical services priority dispatch. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1993 ; Vol. 22, No. 11. pp. 1688-1695.
@article{8551790c85a942a5aee171c147d4f288,
title = "Emergency medical services priority dispatch",
abstract = "Study objective: To test the ability of a locally designed priority dispatch system to safely exclude the need for advanced life support (ALS). Design: Retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) incident records to determine how often the lone dispatch of basic life support (BLS) units, staffed with basic emergency medical technicians, subsequently required or involved ALS care. Setting: A large centralized municipal EMS system with a tiered ALS/BLS ambulance response. All BLS units carry automated defibrillators. Measurements: Consecutive EMS records (35,075) were reviewed by computerized search for ALS procedures. Records indicating ALS procedures were tabulated and then manually reviewed for the nature of and probable indication for the ALS intervention. Intervention: Brief sequences of computer-stored questions that help dispatchers identify (or exclude) signs and symptoms indicating the need for ALS. Results: The dispatch triage system spared ALS units from initial dispatch in 14,100 of the EMS incidents (40.2{\%}), increasing their availability and use for more serious calls. Among these 14,100 cases, only 41 patients (0.3{\%}) later received drugs such as nitroglycerin and naloxone; another 27 patients (0.2{\%}) received resuscitative interventions such as epinephrine or defibrillation. Furthermore, on closer analysis, the immediate presence of a paramedic might have provided a true potential for advantage in outcome for only five or six patients (less than 0.04 of the 14,100 BLS dispatches). Meanwhile, many important operational, fiscal, and cost-effective patient care benefits were realized with this system. Conclusion: A computer-aided dispatch triage algorithm can facilitate improvements in both EMS system operations and prehospital patient care by safely and reliably identifying EMS incidents requiring only BLS.",
keywords = "ALS, ambulance dispatch, emergency medical services, prehospital care",
author = "Curka, {Peter A.} and Pepe, {Paul E.} and Ginger, {Victoria F.} and Sherrard, {Robert C.} and Ivy, {Michael V.} and Zachariah, {Brian S.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81307-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1688--1695",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency medical services priority dispatch

AU - Curka, Peter A.

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

AU - Ginger, Victoria F.

AU - Sherrard, Robert C.

AU - Ivy, Michael V.

AU - Zachariah, Brian S.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Study objective: To test the ability of a locally designed priority dispatch system to safely exclude the need for advanced life support (ALS). Design: Retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) incident records to determine how often the lone dispatch of basic life support (BLS) units, staffed with basic emergency medical technicians, subsequently required or involved ALS care. Setting: A large centralized municipal EMS system with a tiered ALS/BLS ambulance response. All BLS units carry automated defibrillators. Measurements: Consecutive EMS records (35,075) were reviewed by computerized search for ALS procedures. Records indicating ALS procedures were tabulated and then manually reviewed for the nature of and probable indication for the ALS intervention. Intervention: Brief sequences of computer-stored questions that help dispatchers identify (or exclude) signs and symptoms indicating the need for ALS. Results: The dispatch triage system spared ALS units from initial dispatch in 14,100 of the EMS incidents (40.2%), increasing their availability and use for more serious calls. Among these 14,100 cases, only 41 patients (0.3%) later received drugs such as nitroglycerin and naloxone; another 27 patients (0.2%) received resuscitative interventions such as epinephrine or defibrillation. Furthermore, on closer analysis, the immediate presence of a paramedic might have provided a true potential for advantage in outcome for only five or six patients (less than 0.04 of the 14,100 BLS dispatches). Meanwhile, many important operational, fiscal, and cost-effective patient care benefits were realized with this system. Conclusion: A computer-aided dispatch triage algorithm can facilitate improvements in both EMS system operations and prehospital patient care by safely and reliably identifying EMS incidents requiring only BLS.

AB - Study objective: To test the ability of a locally designed priority dispatch system to safely exclude the need for advanced life support (ALS). Design: Retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) incident records to determine how often the lone dispatch of basic life support (BLS) units, staffed with basic emergency medical technicians, subsequently required or involved ALS care. Setting: A large centralized municipal EMS system with a tiered ALS/BLS ambulance response. All BLS units carry automated defibrillators. Measurements: Consecutive EMS records (35,075) were reviewed by computerized search for ALS procedures. Records indicating ALS procedures were tabulated and then manually reviewed for the nature of and probable indication for the ALS intervention. Intervention: Brief sequences of computer-stored questions that help dispatchers identify (or exclude) signs and symptoms indicating the need for ALS. Results: The dispatch triage system spared ALS units from initial dispatch in 14,100 of the EMS incidents (40.2%), increasing their availability and use for more serious calls. Among these 14,100 cases, only 41 patients (0.3%) later received drugs such as nitroglycerin and naloxone; another 27 patients (0.2%) received resuscitative interventions such as epinephrine or defibrillation. Furthermore, on closer analysis, the immediate presence of a paramedic might have provided a true potential for advantage in outcome for only five or six patients (less than 0.04 of the 14,100 BLS dispatches). Meanwhile, many important operational, fiscal, and cost-effective patient care benefits were realized with this system. Conclusion: A computer-aided dispatch triage algorithm can facilitate improvements in both EMS system operations and prehospital patient care by safely and reliably identifying EMS incidents requiring only BLS.

KW - ALS

KW - ambulance dispatch

KW - emergency medical services

KW - prehospital care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027377419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027377419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81307-1

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81307-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 8214858

AN - SCOPUS:0027377419

VL - 22

SP - 1688

EP - 1695

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 11

ER -